linux-um.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [uml-devel] Is commit da3e30e78ed9652322dccb49fa149e7b4e985f74 a candidate for -stable?
@ 2007-09-26 20:59 Nix
  2007-09-26 21:35 ` Jeff Dike
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nix @ 2007-09-26 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: user-mode-linux-devel; +Cc: Jeff Dike

Without this commit, you can't compile UML on a system with 2.6.22
kernel headers (the reserved2 and reserved3 fields have been
renamed). With it, you can use 2.6.22 or older as you like.

(not forwarding to -stable because it seems importunate of me to do so:
is this being too cautious?)

-- 
`Some people don't think performance issues are "real bugs", and I think 
such people shouldn't be allowed to program.' --- Linus Torvalds

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [uml-devel] Is commit da3e30e78ed9652322dccb49fa149e7b4e985f74 a candidate for -stable?
  2007-09-26 20:59 [uml-devel] Is commit da3e30e78ed9652322dccb49fa149e7b4e985f74 a candidate for -stable? Nix
@ 2007-09-26 21:35 ` Jeff Dike
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Dike @ 2007-09-26 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nix; +Cc: user-mode-linux-devel

On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 09:59:47PM +0100, Nix wrote:
> Without this commit, you can't compile UML on a system with 2.6.22
> kernel headers (the reserved2 and reserved3 fields have been
> renamed). With it, you can use 2.6.22 or older as you like.

I take nominations...

The ones I decide on myself are those where I have more than one
report of an already-fixed crash or compilation problem.

> (not forwarding to -stable because it seems importunate of me to do so:
> is this being too cautious?)

This is a good forum.

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-26 21:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-09-26 20:59 [uml-devel] Is commit da3e30e78ed9652322dccb49fa149e7b4e985f74 a candidate for -stable? Nix
2007-09-26 21:35 ` Jeff Dike

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).