* [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] mem=64M, mem=128M, mem=ANYTHING ignored??
[not found] ` <005001c43f79$bcfce6e0$dd02a8c0@ferraro>
@ 2004-05-22 13:01 ` roland
2004-05-22 19:15 ` Michael Roth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: roland @ 2004-05-22 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: uml, user-mode-linux-user; +Cc: user-mode-linux-devel, Jeff Dike
success, too.
the error definitely seems to be a compile issue.
if i compile with -O2, uml just uses the 32M memory default
if i compile with -O1, uml uses the param "mem=..." the right way
furthermore, with O2
- there are left 5 "linux" processes running, after shutting down uml
- if i do a "killall linux" 2 of them being terminated, 3 still left running
i need to kill them with "kill -9 pid"
- the terminal becomes unusable after shutdown - need to issue an "reset" on
that terminal to have it working right again
with O1
- there is only 1 "linux" process being left (still bad because i need to kill
that to boot again)
- the terminal behaves correctly after shutdown
mhhh - don`t know how much "improvement" does "O2" in favour of "O1" - but
who should we ask now, to help hunting this "bug" ?
gcc folks ?
regards
roland
----- Original Message -----
From: "uml" <uml@dot1q.net>
To: <user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 11:22 PM
Subject: Re: [uml-user] mem=64M, mem=128M, mem=ANYTHING ignored??
> SUCCESS.
>
> I wish I had kept the original .config file that was giving me problems
> because I'd have run a diff against it to see what was throwing the errors.
>
> I changed several things at once, however, so I am unsure as to what did it.
> I'm going to retrace through my steps to see if I can reproduce the error on
> this system and post what I discover here. I'm going to try to
> reincorporate -O2 instead of using -O1 as well.
>
> Additionally, the UML now shuts down cleanly without any extra 'linux'
> threads running. Memory is recognized correctly as well and it's running a
> 2.6.6-1 uml kernel.
>
> Thanks for the help and ideas, hopefully I'll be able to contribue some
> diagnostics for someone else in my position who's willing to search this
> group. =)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Dike" <jdike@addtoit.com>
> To: "uml" <uml@dot1q.net>
> Cc: <user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 1.47 PM
> Subject: Re: [uml-user] mem=64M, mem=128M, mem=ANYTHING ignored??
>
>
> > On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 09:55:34AM -0400, uml wrote:
> > > On node 0 totalpages: 8192
> > > DMA zone: 8192 pages, LIFO batch:2
> >
> > > Kernel command line: ubd0=cow1 mem=128M root=98:0
> >
> > Ummmm, strange. It certainly works here:
> >
> > On node 0 totalpages: 32768
> > DMA zone: 32768 pages, LIFO batch:8
> >
> > Kernel command line: ubd0=cow,/home/jdike/roots/debian_22 con0=fd:0,fd:1
> con1=none con=pts ssl=pts umid=debian mem=128M root=98:0
> >
> > That was with 2.6.6. There are no obvious typos in your command line, but
> > it's giving you the default 32M.
> >
> > Can you show us the command line at the shell prompt?
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
> > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
> > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > User-mode-linux-user mailing list
> > User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
> >
> >
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
> Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
> Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> User-mode-linux-user mailing list
> User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] mem=64M, mem=128M, mem=ANYTHING ignored??
2004-05-22 13:01 ` [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] mem=64M, mem=128M, mem=ANYTHING ignored?? roland
@ 2004-05-22 19:15 ` Michael Roth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Roth @ 2004-05-22 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: roland; +Cc: uml, user-mode-linux-user, user-mode-linux-devel, Jeff Dike
roland wrote:
> success, too.
>
> the error definitely seems to be a compile issue.
> if i compile with -O2, uml just uses the 32M memory default
> if i compile with -O1, uml uses the param "mem=..." the right way
I'm not sure and I'm to lazy to check this out, but IIRC I had the same
problems using gcc-3.4.0.
> mhhh - don`t know how much "improvement" does "O2" in favour of "O1" - but
> who should we ask now, to help hunting this "bug" ?
> gcc folks ?
Maybe the gcc manual? RTFM? ;-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.3.3/gcc/Optimize-Options.html
O1 Options:
-fdefer-pop -fmerge-constants -fthread-jumps -floop-optimize
-fcrossjumping -fif-conversion -fif-conversion2 -fdelayed-branch
-fguess-branch-probability -fcprop-registers
O2 Options (O1 options plus the following):
-fforce-mem -foptimize-sibling-calls -fstrength-reduce
-fcse-follow-jumps -fcse-skip-blocks -frerun-cse-after-loop
-frerun-loop-opt -fgcse -fgcse-lm -fgcse-sm
-fdelete-null-pointer-checks -fexpensive-optimizations -fregmov
-fschedule-insns -fschedule-insns2 -fsched-interblock -fsched-spec
-fcaller-saves -fpeephole2 -freorder-blocks -freorder-functions
-fstrict-aliasing -falign-functions -falign-jumps -falign-loops
-falign-labels
Note: First, gcc-3.4.0 is slighlty different. Second, if the problem
states only with gcc-3.x (x>=1) and not with gcc-3.0.0 or gcc-2.x, then
maybe the bug in uml is triggered by the opcode scheduler in the newer
gcc. IIRC correctly, the scheduler changed somewhere in the gcc-3.x
line. But as always, I'm not sure. ;-)
Michael Roth
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-05-22 19:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200405210556.i4L5uIX19375@lifewood.com>
[not found] ` <004101c43f3b$497c26b0$dd02a8c0@ferraro>
[not found] ` <20040521174707.GA7508@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
[not found] ` <005001c43f79$bcfce6e0$dd02a8c0@ferraro>
2004-05-22 13:01 ` [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] mem=64M, mem=128M, mem=ANYTHING ignored?? roland
2004-05-22 19:15 ` Michael Roth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox