* [uml-devel] virtual framebuffer device visible on host [not found] <mailman.1307.1157397566.8760.user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net> @ 2006-09-06 20:11 ` Antoine Martin 2006-09-06 20:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2006-09-15 17:01 ` Jeff Dike 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Antoine Martin @ 2006-09-06 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: user-mode-linux-devel Just a thought, but how hard would it be to have a virtual device in the guests that mimics a framebuffer device and is in fact an X window on the host? I think this could almost be a killer-app. Or is there already a way to do this using VFB? Surely an X window is rich enough to provide all the primitives that a framebuffer device provides? Antoine ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [uml-devel] virtual framebuffer device visible on host 2006-09-06 20:11 ` [uml-devel] virtual framebuffer device visible on host Antoine Martin @ 2006-09-06 20:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2006-09-06 22:12 ` Antoine Martin 2006-09-15 17:01 ` Jeff Dike 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2006-09-06 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Antoine Martin; +Cc: User-mode Linux Kernel Development On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Antoine Martin wrote: > Just a thought, but how hard would it be to have a virtual device in the > guests that mimics a framebuffer device and is in fact an X window on > the host? I think this could almost be a killer-app. > Or is there already a way to do this using VFB? > Surely an X window is rich enough to provide all the primitives that a > framebuffer device provides? It's been done before (but not yet in mainline), cfr. http://www.gatago.com/linux/kernel/6105868.html. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [uml-devel] virtual framebuffer device visible on host 2006-09-06 20:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2006-09-06 22:12 ` Antoine Martin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Antoine Martin @ 2006-09-06 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: User-mode Linux Kernel Development Geert, Thanks for that, the patch is quite small and still applies without too much effort to 2.6.17 (a lot of the rejects are whitespace/no change) Is there any reason not to merge this? Is it hackish or something? I've only compile tested it here since it seems I can't run any guests kernels since I updated to gcc4.1.1/glibc2.4, but I will certainly revisit this code once mainline is fixed. As I mentioned yesterday, older kernels die with: "cannot set up thread-local storage: set_thread_area failed when setting up thread-local storage" And newer (~ 2.6.16 onwards) fail even quicker on my desktop: # ./kernel32-2.6.17.11-x11-fb ubd0=./FedoraCore5-x86-root_fs Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK Checking syscall emulation patch for ptrace...missing Checking for tmpfs mount on /dev/shm...nothing mounted on /dev/shm Checking PROT_EXEC mmap in /tmp/...OK Checking for the skas3 patch in the host: - /proc/mm...not found - PTRACE_FAULTINFO...not found - PTRACE_LDT...not found UML running in SKAS0 mode remove_umid_dir - actually_do_remove failed with err = -2 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Antoine Martin wrote: >> Just a thought, but how hard would it be to have a virtual device in the >> guests that mimics a framebuffer device and is in fact an X window on >> the host? I think this could almost be a killer-app. >> Or is there already a way to do this using VFB? >> Surely an X window is rich enough to provide all the primitives that a >> framebuffer device provides? > > It's been done before (but not yet in mainline), cfr. > http://www.gatago.com/linux/kernel/6105868.html. > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. > -- Linus Torvalds > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [uml-devel] virtual framebuffer device visible on host 2006-09-06 20:11 ` [uml-devel] virtual framebuffer device visible on host Antoine Martin 2006-09-06 20:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2006-09-15 17:01 ` Jeff Dike 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Jeff Dike @ 2006-09-15 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Antoine Martin; +Cc: user-mode-linux-devel On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:11:00PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: > Just a thought, but how hard would it be to have a virtual device in the > guests that mimics a framebuffer device and is in fact an X window on > the host? I think this could almost be a killer-app. There is such a patch in my development tree. The problem is that it totally doesn't work for me, even though it's fine for the guy who wrote it. It needs to be run on a local X server since it uses the shared memory extension, but even when I do that, I get a black window with nothing in it. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-09-15 17:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <mailman.1307.1157397566.8760.user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
2006-09-06 20:11 ` [uml-devel] virtual framebuffer device visible on host Antoine Martin
2006-09-06 20:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-09-06 22:12 ` Antoine Martin
2006-09-15 17:01 ` Jeff Dike
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox