* Re: [uml-devel] feature-removal-schedule entry from 2009 [not found] ` <20120716152140.GA27656@thunk.org> @ 2012-07-17 17:19 ` Rob Landley 2012-07-17 21:29 ` Theodore Ts'o 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Rob Landley @ 2012-07-17 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Theodore Ts'o, user-mode-linux-devel, jdike That should be over on _this_ list then... (Discussion of IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM removal.) On 07/16/2012 10:21 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 03:41:53PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: >> Does it become a "please add a call to sample_interrupt_randomness()" >> reminder, or will the infrastructure figure out when to do that outside >> the driver? > > The patches in the random.git tree unconditionally call > add_interrupt_randomness() in handle_irq_event_percpu(), so the > drivers don't need to do anything at this point. > >> And will this upcoming patch set remove 'em, or leave the NOP debris >> there? > > The current status is here: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tytso/random.git;a=summary > > At this point the flag is a no-op, and can be removed. This close to > the merge window, I don't think I'm going to have time to create > patches which remove the flag from all of the drivers, but it's > basically clean up work, and having the extra bit set isn't going to > harm anyone. > > The only thing that might require a bit of care is the usage in > arch/um, where someone needs to do a bit more analysis to see if it's > just a matter of removing the flag from the call to request_irq(). My > current thinking was to merge the new interrupt structure during this > merge window, and then clean up the NOP debris during the next > development cycle. > > - Ted > > Rob -- GNU/Linux isn't: Linux=GPLv2, GNU=GPLv3+, they can't share code. Either it's "mere aggregation", or a license violation. Pick one. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [uml-devel] feature-removal-schedule entry from 2009 2012-07-17 17:19 ` [uml-devel] feature-removal-schedule entry from 2009 Rob Landley @ 2012-07-17 21:29 ` Theodore Ts'o 2012-07-17 22:29 ` Richard Weinberger 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2012-07-17 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rob Landley; +Cc: jdike, user-mode-linux-devel On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:19:38PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > That should be over on _this_ list then... > > (Discussion of IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM removal.) I took a closer look at the arch/um code, and it wasn't as hard as I thought. I have a proposed set of patches to completely remove IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM that I will be sending out shortly.... - Ted ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [uml-devel] feature-removal-schedule entry from 2009 2012-07-17 21:29 ` Theodore Ts'o @ 2012-07-17 22:29 ` Richard Weinberger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Richard Weinberger @ 2012-07-17 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Theodore Ts'o, user-mode-linux-devel; +Cc: jdike, Rob Landley Am Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:29:46 -0400 schrieb Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:19:38PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > That should be over on _this_ list then... > > > > (Discussion of IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM removal.) > > I took a closer look at the arch/um code, and it wasn't as hard as I > thought. I have a proposed set of patches to completely remove > IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM that I will be sending out shortly.... > I'll happily test them, please CC me. BTW: On UML we have anyway CONFIG_UML_RANDOM to get good random numbers. It reads from thes host's /dev/random. Thanks, //richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-17 22:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <4FFDA698.2000707@landley.net>
[not found] ` <20120713030325.GB12245@thunk.org>
[not found] ` <50032B11.7070505@landley.net>
[not found] ` <20120716152140.GA27656@thunk.org>
2012-07-17 17:19 ` [uml-devel] feature-removal-schedule entry from 2009 Rob Landley
2012-07-17 21:29 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-07-17 22:29 ` Richard Weinberger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox