Re: [PATCH] um: Rename print_stack_trace to do_stack_trace

[Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>]

On 11/21/13 00:31, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> We cannot use print_stack_trace because the name conflicts
> with linux/stacktrace.h.
> 
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>

Thanks.

> ---
>  arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
> index 4d6fdf6..799d7e4 100644
> --- a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
> +++ b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ struct stack_frame {
>  	unsigned long return_address;
>  };
>  
> -static void print_stack_trace(unsigned long *sp, unsigned long bp)
> +static void do_stack_trace(unsigned long *sp, unsigned long bp)
>  {
>  	int reliable;
>  	unsigned long addr;
> @@ -94,5 +94,5 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack)
>  	}
>  	printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
>  
> -	print_stack_trace(sp, bp);
> +	do_stack_trace(sp, bp);
>  }
> 


-- 
~Randy