Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] um: Switch clocksource to hrtimers

[Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@kot-begemot.co.uk>]

I have it ported to 4.3-rc5 and the new timer API.

It is about half-way through a debian dist-upgrade which was reliably 
crashing earlier versions.

I am going to give it a spin over the weekend and if it is stable I will 
clean it up for submission.

A.


On 14/10/15 12:22, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Am 14.10.2015 11:23 vorm. schrieb Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@kot-begemot.co.uk>:
>> On 14/10/15 09:25, Thomas Meyer wrote:
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> I would like to finish this patch, but I'm currently very busy. Sorry!
>> No worries :) I am barely keeping my head above water too :)
>>
>> Is the most up-to-date revision the one you last posted to the list?
> Yes,the post on the list was the latest version.
>
>> If
>> you have a more up-to-date one, please post it even if it does not patch
>> cleanly and needs work. I will work on it.
>>
>> A.
>>
>>> Anton: it would be great if you could finish this patch! Much appreciated!
>>>
>>> With kind regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> Am 14.10.2015 8:12 vorm. schrieb Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@kot-begemot.co.uk>:
>>>> Thomas, I need to know if you have the time-slices for this or I should
>>>> take over and finish it.
>>>>
>>>> In addition to what Richard said I have the epoll based IRQ controller
>>>> and high-performance network pipeline which depend on it in the queue.
>>>>
>>>> Brgds,
>>>>
>>>> A.
>>>>
>>>> On 13/10/15 22:45, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de> wrote:
>>>>>> Am 15.08.2015 10:15 vorm. schrieb Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>:
>>>>>>> Am 09.08.2015 um 19:53 schrieb Thomas Meyer:
>>>>>>>> Switch the UML clocksource from interval timers to posix interval timers and
>>>>>>>> move to a monotonic timer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This fixes suspend&resume related timer issues and improves network performance
>>>>>>>> as TCP state machines are now fed with the correct time; also correct QoS and
>>>>>>>> traffic shaping.
>>>>>>> The patch is rather big. Please describe in your commit message how exactly
>>>>>>> it works and why.
>>>>>>> It changes many internals.
>>>>>> Will do so!
>>>>> Can I get an updated version of that patch?
>>>>> I really want to merge it in the next merge window.
>>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
>>>> User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel