From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: blaisorblade@yahoo.it
Subject: [uml-devel] PATCH [00/03]: allow building of UML with skas headers installed via `make headers_install'
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 21:02:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8764d1aplt.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> (raw)
I recently upgraded my glibc to 2.5, and upgraded the userspace headers
at the same time. As a result, I've had several problems with UML.
One of these Jeff has seen reported and fixed, although the correct
cause was not described (the #inclusion of <linux/stddef.h> instead of
<stddef.h> in user-offsets.c).
However, other problems are so-far undescribed. There's one trivial one
(fixed in patch 3 in this series, should be uncontroversial).
And then there's this:
CC arch/um/os-Linux/process.o
In file included from arch/um/include/skas_ptrace.h:12,
from arch/um/os-Linux/process.c:23:
arch/um/include/sysdep/skas_ptrace.h:9: error: redefinition of `struct ptrace_faultinfo'
arch/um/include/sysdep/skas_ptrace.h:14: error: redefinition of `struct ptrace_ldt'
The problem is that I installed my host kernel's headers, and that
kernel has the skas patch installed, so the skas ptrace structures
are already defined in <asm/ptrace.h>. Thankfully it's guarded by a
#define that we can test, but even so we need to split that SKAS
section out into a new header. (diff attached, not gitted since
the SKAS part isn't maintained in git anyway.)
So the following patches are a terribly provisional way to fix this:
it works but it may not maintain the separation between skas and
mainline that you want. At least it points up the existence of the
problems.
There are two patches in this series: one which splits the skas part of
ptrace.h into its own header, so that UML can use it, and one that
uses that header instead of skas_ptrace.h.
(All diffs against 2.6.18.x: I can respin against 2.6.19-pre if you
want, but, again, this area changes little so I'd expect things to
apply reasonably well anyway.)
--
`The main high-level difference between Emacs and (say) UNIX, Windows,
or BeOS... is that Emacs boots quicker.' --- PdS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next reply other threads:[~2006-11-26 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-26 21:02 Nix [this message]
2006-11-29 16:02 ` [uml-devel] PATCH [00/03]: allow building of UML with skas headers installed via `make headers_install' Blaisorblade
2006-12-01 15:15 ` Nix
2006-12-07 12:38 ` Blaisorblade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8764d1aplt.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix \
--to=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox