linux-um archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] PATCH [00/03]: allow building of UML with skas headers installed via `make headers_install'
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:15:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877ixby7ep.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611291702.21439.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> (blaisorblade@yahoo.it's message of "Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:02:20 +0100")

On 29 Nov 2006, blaisorblade@yahoo.it verbalised:
> On Sunday 26 November 2006 22:02, Nix wrote:
>> However, other problems are so-far undescribed. There's one trivial one
>> (fixed in patch 3 in this series, should be uncontroversial).
> Agreed.

Oh good, that's the only one I was confident of.

>> And then there's this:
>>
>>   CC      arch/um/os-Linux/process.o
>> In file included from arch/um/include/skas_ptrace.h:12,
>>                  from arch/um/os-Linux/process.c:23:
>> arch/um/include/sysdep/skas_ptrace.h:9: error: redefinition of `struct
>> ptrace_faultinfo' arch/um/include/sysdep/skas_ptrace.h:14: error:
>> redefinition of `struct ptrace_ldt'
>
>> The problem is that I installed my host kernel's headers, and that
>> kernel has the skas patch installed, so the skas ptrace structures
>> are already defined in <asm/ptrace.h>. Thankfully it's guarded by a
>> #define that we can test, but even so we need to split that SKAS
>> section out into a new header. (diff attached, not gitted since
>> the SKAS part isn't maintained in git anyway.)
>
>> So the following patches are a terribly provisional way to fix this:
>> it works but it may not maintain the separation between skas and
>> mainline that you want.
> 
> You maybe refer to the problem that without SKAS in host headers the resulting 
> UML tree does not compile?

I *have* SKAS in the host headers. That's the problem (and it arguably
shouldn't be).

>                             Yes, it is a problem. You are trying to remove all 
> duplications, and probably you should avoid them. Define a macro to test with 
> a more reasonable name (say __UML_SKAS_SUPPORT ...).

OK, will do. I just thought that cutting the skas-ptrace stuff into its
own header, rather than duplicating pieces of it between arch/ and
include/um/, seemed more immediately reasonable.

-- 
`The main high-level difference between Emacs and (say) UNIX, Windows,
 or BeOS... is that Emacs boots quicker.' --- PdS

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-01 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-26 21:02 [uml-devel] PATCH [00/03]: allow building of UML with skas headers installed via `make headers_install' Nix
2006-11-29 16:02 ` Blaisorblade
2006-12-01 15:15   ` Nix [this message]
2006-12-07 12:38     ` Blaisorblade

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877ixby7ep.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix \
    --to=nix@esperi.org.uk \
    --cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox