From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Glenn Washburn <development@efficientek.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kbingham@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@kot-begemot.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] GDB: Support getting current task struct in UML
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:51:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a22d84e-5cf4-bf41-220e-dc5e48fb2fc3@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1676532759.git.development@efficientek.com>
On 16.02.23 08:37, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> Added suggestions from Jan.
>
> Glenn
>
> Glenn Washburn (2):
> scripts/gdb: Correct indentation in get_current_task
> scripts/gdb: Support getting current task struct in UML
>
> scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> Range-diff against v1:
> 1: f33ebe524590 ! 1: c5a916e094d9 scripts/gdb: Correct indentation in get_current_task
> @@ Commit message
>
> There is an extra space in a couple blocks in get_current_task.
> Though python does not care, let's make the spacing consistent.
> + Also, format better an if expression, removing unneeded parenthesis.
>
> ## scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py ##
> @@ scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py: def get_current_task(cpu):
> @@ scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py: def get_current_task(cpu):
> - raise gdb.GdbError("Sorry, obtaining the current task is not allowed "
> - "while running in userspace(EL0)")
> + current_task_addr = gdb.parse_and_eval("$SP_EL0")
> -+ if((current_task_addr >> 63) != 0):
> ++ if (current_task_addr >> 63) != 0:
> + current_task = current_task_addr.cast(task_ptr_type)
> + return current_task.dereference()
> + else:
> 2: 8c3db2291f58 ! 2: 683d10e752cd scripts/gdb: Support getting current task struct in UML
> @@ Commit message
> A running x86 UML kernel reports with architecture "i386:x86-64" as
> it is a sub-architecture. However, a difference with bare-metal x86
> kernels is in how it manages tasks and the current task struct. To
> - identify that the inferior is a UML kernel and not bare-metal, the
> - symbol "uml_kmalloc" is checked for. If it exists, then do the UML
> - specific way of getting the current task struct.
> + identify that the inferior is a UML kernel and not bare-metal, check
> + for the existence of the UML specific symbol "cpu_tasks" which
> + contains the current task struct.
>
> ## scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py ##
> @@ scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py: def get_current_task(cpu):
> @@ scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py: def get_current_task(cpu):
> if utils.is_target_arch("x86"):
> - var_ptr = gdb.parse_and_eval("¤t_task")
> - return per_cpu(var_ptr, cpu).dereference()
> -+ if gdb.lookup_global_symbol("uml_kmalloc"):
> ++ if gdb.lookup_global_symbol("cpu_tasks"):
> ++ # This is a UML kernel, which stores the current task
> ++ # differently than other x86 sub architectures
> + var_ptr = gdb.parse_and_eval("(struct task_struct *)cpu_tasks[0].task")
> + return var_ptr.dereference()
> + else:
> @@ scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py: def get_current_task(cpu):
> + return per_cpu(var_ptr, cpu).dereference()
> elif utils.is_target_arch("aarch64"):
> current_task_addr = gdb.parse_and_eval("$SP_EL0")
> - if((current_task_addr >> 63) != 0):
> + if (current_task_addr >> 63) != 0:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Technology
Competence Center Embedded Linux
_______________________________________________
linux-um mailing list
linux-um@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-16 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-16 7:37 [PATCH v2 0/2] GDB: Support getting current task struct in UML Glenn Washburn
2023-02-16 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] scripts/gdb: Correct indentation in get_current_task Glenn Washburn
2023-02-18 1:11 ` Glenn Washburn
2023-02-16 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] scripts/gdb: Support getting current task struct in UML Glenn Washburn
2023-02-18 1:11 ` Glenn Washburn
2023-02-16 7:51 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2023-02-16 22:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] GDB: " Andrew Morton
2023-02-16 22:54 ` Richard Weinberger
2023-02-16 23:33 ` Andrew Morton
2023-02-17 10:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-02-17 21:56 ` Glenn Washburn
2023-02-17 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
2023-02-18 1:11 ` Glenn Washburn
2023-02-23 21:14 ` Andrew Morton
2023-02-26 6:47 ` Glenn Washburn
2023-02-26 19:35 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8a22d84e-5cf4-bf41-220e-dc5e48fb2fc3@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton.ivanov@kot-begemot.co.uk \
--cc=development@efficientek.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kbingham@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox