From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"open list:PCI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:THUNDERBOLT DRIVER" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS"
<amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS"
<nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
Alexander.Deucher@amd.com, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] PCI: Move `is_thunderbolt` check for lack of command completed to a quirk
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:20:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220211212025.GA735312@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220211193250.1904843-3-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Update subject to something like:
PCI: pciehp: Quirk broken Command Completed support on Intel Thunderbolt controllers
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 01:32:40PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> The `is_thunderbolt` check is currently used to indicate the lack of
> command completed support for a number of older Thunderbolt devices.
>
> This however is heavy handed and should have been done via a quirk. Move
> the affected devices outlined in commit 493fb50e958c ("PCI: pciehp: Assume
> NoCompl+ for Thunderbolt ports") into pci quirks.
>
> Suggested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 6 +-----
> drivers/pci/quirks.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> index 1c1ebf3dad43..e4c42b24aba8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> @@ -996,11 +996,7 @@ struct controller *pcie_init(struct pcie_device *dev)
> if (pdev->hotplug_user_indicators)
> slot_cap &= ~(PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_AIP | PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_PIP);
>
> - /*
> - * We assume no Thunderbolt controllers support Command Complete events,
> - * but some controllers falsely claim they do.
> - */
> - if (pdev->is_thunderbolt)
> + if (pdev->no_cmd_complete)
> slot_cap |= PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_NCCS;
>
> ctrl->slot_cap = slot_cap;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> index d2dd6a6cda60..6d3c88edde00 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> @@ -3675,6 +3675,23 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_CACTUS_RIDGE_4C
> DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_PORT_RIDGE,
> quirk_thunderbolt_hotplug_msi);
Please add a comment above to the effect that PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_NCCS
being clear means the controller generates a Command Completed software
notification when it completes a command, and these controllers don't
generate those notifications even though PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_NCCS is clear
(PCIe r6.0, sec 7.5.3.9).
> +static void quirk_thunderbolt_command_completed(struct pci_dev *pdev)
Rename to quirk_no_command_completed(). This doesn't have anything to
do with Thunderbolt; it's just that the affected devices happen to be
Thunderbolt controllers.
> +{
> + pdev->no_cmd_complete = 1;
> +}
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_LIGHT_RIDGE,
> + quirk_thunderbolt_command_completed);
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_EAGLE_RIDGE,
> + quirk_thunderbolt_command_completed);
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_LIGHT_PEAK,
> + quirk_thunderbolt_command_completed);
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_CACTUS_RIDGE_4C,
> + quirk_thunderbolt_command_completed);
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_CACTUS_RIDGE_2C,
> + quirk_thunderbolt_command_completed);
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_PORT_RIDGE,
> + quirk_thunderbolt_command_completed);
Can we put these in drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c? We already
have a few similar quirks there.
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> /*
> * Apple: Shutdown Cactus Ridge Thunderbolt controller.
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 8253a5413d7c..1e5b769e42fc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -443,6 +443,8 @@ struct pci_dev {
> unsigned int is_hotplug_bridge:1;
> unsigned int shpc_managed:1; /* SHPC owned by shpchp */
> unsigned int is_thunderbolt:1; /* Thunderbolt controller */
> + unsigned int no_cmd_complete:1; /* Lies about command completed events */
> +
> /*
> * Devices marked being untrusted are the ones that can potentially
> * execute DMA attacks and similar. They are typically connected
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-11 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-11 19:32 [PATCH v3 00/12] Overhaul `is_thunderbolt` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] thunderbolt: move definition of PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB_USB4 Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 21:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] PCI: Move `is_thunderbolt` check for lack of command completed to a quirk Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 21:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] PCI: Move check for old Apple Thunderbolt controllers into " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 21:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-11 22:06 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-02-14 7:15 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-13 9:19 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-02-13 9:21 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-02-14 7:23 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] PCI: Drop the `is_thunderbolt` attribute from PCI core Mario Limonciello
2022-02-13 8:20 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-02-13 17:26 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-02-14 7:27 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] PCI: Detect root port of internal USB4 devices by `usb4-host-interface` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 21:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-14 7:34 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-14 8:52 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-02-14 10:56 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-14 11:08 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-14 11:11 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-17 20:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] PCI: Explicitly mark USB4 NHI devices as removable Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 21:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] PCI: Set ports for discrete USB4 controllers appropriately Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 22:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] drm/amd: drop the use of `pci_is_thunderbolt_attached` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] drm/nouveau: " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] drm/radeon: " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] platform/x86: amd-gmux: " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] PCI: drop `pci_is_thunderbolt_attached` Mario Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220211212025.GA735312@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
--cc=YehezkelShB@gmail.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=michael.jamet@intel.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox