From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"open list:PCI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:THUNDERBOLT DRIVER" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS"
<amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS"
<nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
Alexander.Deucher@amd.com, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] PCI: Drop the `is_thunderbolt` attribute from PCI core
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:27:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgoEUYLbYUbk5A6Q@lahna> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0ef8f2cb-1978-f469-71d3-2cf7469eb8b6@amd.com>
Hi Mario,
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 11:26:56AM -0600, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
> On 2/13/2022 02:20, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 01:32:42PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > > The `is_thunderbolt` attribute is currently a dumping ground for a
> > > variety of things.
> >
> > It's not as arbitrary as it may seem. Quite a bit of thought went into
> > the current design.
> >
> >
> > > Instead use the driver core removable attribute to indicate the
> > > detail a device is attached to a thunderbolt or USB4 chain.
> >
> > You're missing the point that "is_thunderbolt" is set on the *controller*
> > (i.e. its upstream and downstream ports).
> >
> > The controller itself is *not* removable if it's the host controller.
> >
> > However a device can be assumed to be removable if it has an ancestor
> > which has the "is_thunderbolt" flag set.
> >
>
> Ah right... I wonder if really what this series should be about then is
> setting up the the PCIe endpoints for PCIe tunneling and XHCI tunneling to
> be marked as "external" instead then. It would mean that existing code will
> apply the removable attribute to everything downstream (and presumably at
> least some of those drivers it will continue to make sense to drop
> "pcie_is_thunderbolt_attached" and instead check dev_is_removable.
Yes, I think this is the right thing to do. Anything connected over
PCIe/USB 3.x tunnel is pretty much "removable" whereas the host
controllers may or may not. Typically they are not.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-14 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-11 19:32 [PATCH v3 00/12] Overhaul `is_thunderbolt` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] thunderbolt: move definition of PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB_USB4 Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 21:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] PCI: Move `is_thunderbolt` check for lack of command completed to a quirk Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 21:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] PCI: Move check for old Apple Thunderbolt controllers into " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 21:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-11 22:06 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-02-14 7:15 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-13 9:19 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-02-13 9:21 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-02-14 7:23 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] PCI: Drop the `is_thunderbolt` attribute from PCI core Mario Limonciello
2022-02-13 8:20 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-02-13 17:26 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-02-14 7:27 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] PCI: Detect root port of internal USB4 devices by `usb4-host-interface` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 21:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-14 7:34 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-14 8:52 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-02-14 10:56 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-14 11:08 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-14 11:11 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-17 20:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] PCI: Explicitly mark USB4 NHI devices as removable Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 21:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] PCI: Set ports for discrete USB4 controllers appropriately Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 22:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] drm/amd: drop the use of `pci_is_thunderbolt_attached` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] drm/nouveau: " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] drm/radeon: " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] platform/x86: amd-gmux: " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-11 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] PCI: drop `pci_is_thunderbolt_attached` Mario Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YgoEUYLbYUbk5A6Q@lahna \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
--cc=YehezkelShB@gmail.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=michael.jamet@intel.com \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox