Linux USB
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Khazhy Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>,
	USB mailing list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] USB: core: Don't overwrite device descriptor during reinitialization
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:28:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230810002257.nadxmfmrobkaxgnz@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6eadec91-990a-4fbd-8883-8366c4a4d8e4@rowland.harvard.edu>

Hi Alan,

On Fri, Aug 04, 2023, Alan Stern wrote:
> An outstanding syzbot bug report has been traced to a race between the
> routine that reads in the device descriptor for a device being
> reinitialized and the routine that writes the descriptors to a sysfs
> attribute file.  The problem is that reinitializing a device, like
> initializing it for the first time, stores the device descriptor
> directly in the usb_device structure, where it may be accessed
> concurrently as part of sending the descriptors to the sysfs reader.
> 
> This three-part series fixes the problem:
> 
> 	The first patch unites the code paths responsible for first
> 	reading the device descriptor in hub.c's old scheme and new
> 	scheme, so that neither of them will call
> 	usb_get_device_descriptor().
> 
> 	The second patch changes usb_get_device_descriptor(), making
> 	it return the descriptor in a dynamically allocated buffer
> 	rather than storing it directly in the device structure.
> 
> 	The third patch changes hub_port_init(), adding a new argument
> 	that specifies a buffer in which to store the device
> 	descriptor for devices being reinitialized.
> 
> As a result of these changes, the copy of the device descriptor stored
> in the usb_device structure will never be overwritten once it has been
> initialized.  This eliminates the data race causing the bug identified
> by syzbot.
> 
> It would be nice at some point to make a similar change to the code
> that reads the device's BOS descriptor; reinitialization should not
> overwrite its existing data either.  This series doesn't attempt to do
> that, but it would be a good thing to do.
> 

Testing from Greg's usb-next branch, this series causes problem with
device enumeration:

[   31.650759] usb 2-1: new SuperSpeed Plus Gen 2x1 USB device number 2 using xhci_hcd
[   31.663107] usb 2-1: device descriptor read/8, error -71
[   31.952697] usb 2-1: new SuperSpeed Plus Gen 2x1 USB device number 3 using xhci_hcd
[   31.965122] usb 2-1: device descriptor read/8, error -71
[   32.080991] usb usb2-port1: attempt power cycle
[   34.826893] usb 2-1: new SuperSpeed Plus Gen 2x1 USB device number 5 using xhci_hcd
[   34.839241] usb 2-1: device descriptor read/8, error -71
[   35.129908] usb 2-1: new SuperSpeed Plus Gen 2x1 USB device number 6 using xhci_hcd
[   35.142264] usb 2-1: device descriptor read/8, error -71
[   35.257155] usb usb2-port1: attempt power cycle
[   37.258922] usb 1-1: new high-speed USB device number 5 using xhci_hcd
[   38.115053] usb 2-1: new SuperSpeed Plus Gen 2x1 USB device number 8 using xhci_hcd
[   38.127407] usb 2-1: device descriptor read/8, error -71
[   38.417066] usb 2-1: new SuperSpeed Plus Gen 2x1 USB device number 9 using xhci_hcd
[   38.429428] usb 2-1: device descriptor read/8, error -71
[   38.545315] usb usb2-port1: attempt power cycle
[   43.347312] usb 2-2: new SuperSpeed Plus Gen 2x1 USB device number 11 using xhci_hcd
[   43.359659] usb 2-2: device descriptor read/8, error -71
[   43.649323] usb 2-2: new SuperSpeed Plus Gen 2x1 USB device number 12 using xhci_hcd
[   43.661681] usb 2-2: device descriptor read/8, error -71
[   43.777566] usb usb2-port2: attempt power cycle

I was testing with our host along with other common vendor hosts with a
few 3.x devices. Reverting this series resolves the issue. I didn't do
extensive tests for various speeds or debug it. I just want to notify
this first perhaps you can figure out the issue right away.

I can look into it and provide more info later this week. If you want to
print any debug, let me know and I can provide later this week.

Thanks,
Thinh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-10  0:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-04 19:09 [PATCH 0/3] USB: core: Don't overwrite device descriptor during reinitialization Alan Stern
2023-08-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] USB: core: Unite old scheme and new scheme descriptor reads Alan Stern
2023-08-04 19:12   ` [PATCH 2/3] USB: core: Change usb_get_device_descriptor() API Alan Stern
2023-08-04 19:14     ` [PATCH 3/3] USB: core: Fix race by not overwriting udev->descriptor in hub_port_init() Alan Stern
2023-12-11 10:40   ` [REGRESSION] Re: [PATCH 1/3] USB: core: Unite old scheme and new scheme descriptor reads Christian Eggers
2023-12-11 16:21     ` Alan Stern
2023-12-12  8:01       ` Christian Eggers
2023-08-08  8:47 ` [PATCH 0/3] USB: core: Don't overwrite device descriptor during reinitialization Greg KH
2023-08-10  0:28 ` Thinh Nguyen [this message]
2023-08-10  1:47   ` Alan Stern
2023-08-10 16:34     ` Alan Stern
2023-08-10 22:39       ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-11  1:52         ` Alan Stern
2023-08-11 17:05           ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-11 17:38             ` [PATCH] USB: core: Fix oversight in SuperSpeed initialization Alan Stern
2023-08-12  8:05               ` Greg KH
2023-08-12 15:28                 ` Alan Stern
2024-03-05  8:20 ` [REGRESSION] Re: [PATCH 0/3] USB: core: Don't overwrite device descriptor during reinitialization Jan Čermák
2024-03-06 21:08   ` Alan Stern
2024-03-07 16:17     ` Jan Čermák
2024-03-07 19:34       ` Alan Stern
2024-03-11  9:58         ` Jan Čermák
2024-03-11 14:43           ` Alan Stern
2024-03-12  8:57             ` Jan Čermák
2024-03-12 20:47               ` Alan Stern
2024-03-16 20:35               ` Alan Stern
2024-03-19 11:54                 ` Jan Čermák
2024-03-19 16:03                   ` Alan Stern
2024-03-27 13:24                     ` Jan Čermák
2024-03-27 14:21                       ` Alan Stern
2024-03-28 15:44                         ` Alexander Dahl
2024-03-28 16:16                           ` Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230810002257.nadxmfmrobkaxgnz@synopsys.com \
    --to=thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=khazhy@google.com \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox