From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dwc3: unusual handling of setup requests with wLength == 0
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 01:08:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230818010815.4kcue67idma5yguf@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+fCnZcQSYy63ichdivAH5-fYvN2UMzTtZ--h=F6nK0jfVou3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> Hi Alan and Thinh,
>
> I have been testing Raw Gadget with the dwc3 UDC driver and stumbled
> upon an issue related to how dwc3 handles setup requests with wLength
> == 0.
>
> When running a simple Raw Gadget-based keyboard emulator [1],
> everything works as expected until the point when the host sends a
> SET_CONFIGURATION request, which has wLength == 0.
>
> For setup requests with wLength != 0, just like the other UDC drivers
> I tested, dwc3 calls the gadget driver's ->setup() callback and then
> waits until the gadget driver queues an URB to EP0 as a response.
For the lack of better term, can we use "request" or "usb_request"
instead of URB for gadget side, I get confused with the host side
whenever we mention URB.
>
> However, for a setup request with wLength == 0, dwc3 does not wait
> until the gadget driver queues an URB to ack the transfer. It appears
> that dwc3 just acks the request internally and then proceeds with
> calling the ->setup() callback for the next request received from the
It depends on the bRequest. It should not proceed to ->setup() unless
the gadget driver already setups the request for it.
> host. This confuses Raw Gadget, as it does not expect to get a new
> ->setup() call before it explicitly acks the previous one by queuing
> an URB. As a result, the emulation fails.
If the host intent is to send a 3-stage control request with a 0-length
data packet, the gadget driver needs to return USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS
to prepare a 0-length request. For SET_CONFIGURATION, we don't expect
a data phase, why should the gadget driver queue a 0-length data?
>
> I suspect this issue has not been observed with other gadget drivers,
> as they queue an URB immediately after receiving a ->setup() call:
> dwc3 appears to somehow correctly handle this internally even though
> it acks the transfer by itself. But the timings with Raw Gadget are
> different, as it requires userspace to ack the transfer. Sometimes
> though, the Raw Gadget-based emulator also manages to queue an URB
> before the next request is received from the host and the enumeration
> continues properly (until the next request with wLength == 0).
>
> What do you think would be the best approach to deal with this?
The communication should be clearly defined. That is, the dwc3 needs to
know if this is a 3-stage or 2-stage control transfer. It knows about
the standard requests, but not the vendor/non-standard ones. If the raw
gadget defined some unknown OUT request, it needs to tell dwc3 whether
it should expect the data stage or not.
BR,
Thinh
>
> Can this be considered a bug in dwc3 that should be fixed? There's a
> seemingly related comment in dwc3 code [2], but I'm not familiar
> enough with its internals to understand whether this is what leads to
> the issue I'm seeing.
>
> Or should I adapt Raw Gadget to handle this unusual dwc3 behavior?
> This might be tricky to do, as I cannot change the existing userspace
> API.
>
> On a side note, as an experiment, I tried returning
> USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS from the Raw Gadget's ->setup() callback if
> the UDC driver calls it too early: some UDC drivers, including dwc3,
> appear to contain a special handling for this return value. However,
> that didn't work out. Perhaps, I misunderstand the meaning of this
> value.
>
> Thank you!
>
> [1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xairy/raw-gadget/blob/master/examples/keyboard.c__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!fsksN9-eooWS7Uui8MfCcBkff8awG2ovwl6UaPuJ4_v50Ny5s-WQ4YuQht1ACRl6eDYZ4o-gkVlF6l82C8UT58e7$
> [2] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc6/source/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c*L145__;Iw!!A4F2R9G_pg!fsksN9-eooWS7Uui8MfCcBkff8awG2ovwl6UaPuJ4_v50Ny5s-WQ4YuQht1ACRl6eDYZ4o-gkVlF6l82C6Q3wZfW$
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-18 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-18 0:15 dwc3: unusual handling of setup requests with wLength == 0 Andrey Konovalov
2023-08-18 1:08 ` Thinh Nguyen [this message]
2023-08-18 2:37 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-18 3:10 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-18 3:26 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-18 3:42 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-18 19:49 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-18 20:46 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-18 23:06 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-19 0:06 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-19 1:54 ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-08-20 14:20 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-21 16:13 ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-08-21 17:25 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-23 2:05 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-23 2:30 ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-08-23 15:48 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-23 17:18 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-25 1:36 ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-08-25 2:08 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-23 2:14 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-23 15:17 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-23 17:59 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-23 19:19 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-23 22:22 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-24 2:21 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-26 1:20 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-26 3:10 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-30 1:32 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-30 14:48 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-31 2:43 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-31 15:40 ` Alan Stern
2023-09-01 1:27 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-09-01 17:37 ` Alan Stern
2023-09-01 21:14 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-09-02 15:15 ` Alan Stern
2023-09-05 22:53 ` Thinh Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230818010815.4kcue67idma5yguf@synopsys.com \
--to=thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox