From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dwc3: unusual handling of setup requests with wLength == 0
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 17:18:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230823171757.vegbktpkk23eg34z@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bdf69b9d-fe82-48e2-9638-d84d00d4ef1d@rowland.harvard.edu>
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 04:30:23AM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > I started looking into reworking the UDC drivers to drop the special
> > case for USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS, but this seems more complicated.
> >
> > First, I noticed that some of the UDC drivers only expect to handle a
> > delayed Status stage for SET_CONFIGURATION requests. (Which is
Just want to clarify that dwc3 would expect a delayed status for any
request returned with USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS. The issue is that dwc3
assumes the _first_ delayed request would be SET_CONFIGURATION. Any
subsequence control request with delayed request, it assumes the device
is already in configured state.
>
> That expectation is wrong; gadget drivers can also want to delay the
> Status stage for a SET_INTERFACE request. And in theory they might want
> to delay any control-OUT transfer.
Agree. Thanks Andrey and Alan for looking into dwc3.
Regarding SET_INTERFACE, it should be fine because it should be done
while it's already in configured state, which is after
SET_CONFIGURATION. But it's true that dwc3 needs to fix this assumption
here.
>
> > reasonable, as they were developed assuming that only the composite
> > framework might request to delay the Status stage.) In particular,
> > dwc3, cdns2, and cdns3 set the gadget state to USB_STATE_CONFIGURED
> > when handling a delayed Status stage:
> >
> > dwc3/ep0.c:136: usb_gadget_set_state(dwc->gadget, USB_STATE_CONFIGURED);
> > cdns3/cdns3-ep0.c:739: usb_gadget_set_state(&priv_dev->gadget,
> > USB_STATE_CONFIGURED);
> > gadget/udc/cdns2/cdns2-ep0.c:572: usb_gadget_set_state(&pdev->gadget,
> > USB_STATE_CONFIGURED);
>
> This is also wrong. SET_CONFIGURATION can tell a gadget to install
> config 0, in which case the state should be changed to
> USB_STATE_ADDRESS.
Added on my TODO list.
>
> For that matter, a gadget can undergo many state changes other than the
> change into the CONFIGURED state. It doesn't look like many of the UDC
> drivers are careful about reporting them.
>
> > So I believe an additional check for whether the request was indeed
> > SET_CONFIGURATION is required. (cdns2 and cdns3 also do other things
> > besides setting the state to USB_STATE_CONFIGURED, but it should be
> > possible to hide that under the same check.)
> >
> > I also looked into how other UDC drivers change the gadget state to
> > USB_STATE_CONFIGURED:
> >
> > 1. isp1760, mtu3, and bdc immediately set USB_STATE_CONFIGURED once
> > they receive a SET_CONFIGURATION request, before calling ->setup() for
> > the gadget driver;
> > 2. gr and mv_u3d do that after the ->setup() call;
> > 3. tegra does it after the first non-control endpoint is enabled;
> > 4. dwc3, cdns2, and cdns3 appear to not set USB_STATE_CONFIGURED if
> > the Status stage is not delayed;
> > 5. dwc2, cdnsp, and all other UDCs don't set USB_STATE_CONFIGURED at all.
> >
> > I'm guessing the UDCs in #4 and #5 expect the gadget driver to set
> > USB_STATE_CONFIGURED.
> >
> > I see that the composite framework sets the gadget state to
> > USB_STATE_CONFIGURED even if some of the functions request a delayed
> > Status stage via USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS. And GadgetFS also sets the
> > state to USB_STATE_CONFIGURED before delegating the SET_CONFIGURATION
> > request to userspace. However, Raw Gadget expects the userspace to
> > issue an ioctl that sets USB_STATE_CONFIGURED before completing the
> > delayed SET_CONFIGURATION request.
> >
> > So I am wondering: when is proper time to set USB_STATE_CONFIGURED?
> > And should this be handled by the UDC driver or the gadget driver?
>
> The proper time isn't really well defined. As far as the gadget driver
> is concerned, it's when the configuration change is completed (when it
> tells the composite framework to stop delaying the status stage). But
> as far as the host is concerned, it's when the Status stage completes
> successfully.
>
> If the Status stage of the control transfer gets corrupted, it's
> possible to end up in a situation where the gadget believes it is
> configured and the host believes it isn't. Luckily this doesn't
> happen very often, and if it does then the host should reissue the
> transfer.
>
> All the other state changes are (or should be) handled by the UDC
> drivers. I guess they can handle the changes to/from the CONFIGURED
> state as well, although they will have to be more careful about it than
> they are now.
>
The dwc3 tries to handle these state changes. However, as pointed out,
it needs to be audited. We got a little over reliant on USB CV tests to
audit these state changes for us.
Thanks,
Thinh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-23 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-18 0:15 dwc3: unusual handling of setup requests with wLength == 0 Andrey Konovalov
2023-08-18 1:08 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-18 2:37 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-18 3:10 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-18 3:26 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-18 3:42 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-18 19:49 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-18 20:46 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-18 23:06 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-19 0:06 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-19 1:54 ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-08-20 14:20 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-21 16:13 ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-08-21 17:25 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-23 2:05 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-23 2:30 ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-08-23 15:48 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-23 17:18 ` Thinh Nguyen [this message]
2023-08-25 1:36 ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-08-25 2:08 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-23 2:14 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-23 15:17 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-23 17:59 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-23 19:19 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-23 22:22 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-24 2:21 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-26 1:20 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-26 3:10 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-30 1:32 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-30 14:48 ` Alan Stern
2023-08-31 2:43 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-08-31 15:40 ` Alan Stern
2023-09-01 1:27 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-09-01 17:37 ` Alan Stern
2023-09-01 21:14 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-09-02 15:15 ` Alan Stern
2023-09-05 22:53 ` Thinh Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230823171757.vegbktpkk23eg34z@synopsys.com \
--to=thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox