Re: usb-next tree has patch applied twice

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 11:16:59AM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> CC'ing Sean as well.
> 
> Am Donnerstag, 22. Februar 2024, 08:47:28 CET schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 04:29:04PM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > > 
> > > on the usb-next tree [1] the patch 'usb: phy: generic: Get the vbus supply
> > > has been applied twice:
> > > * 03e607cbb2931374db1825f371e9c7f28526d3f4
> > 
> > This is from the 5.18 release, from this email series:
> > 	https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220425171412.1188485-3-sean.anderson@seco.com/
> > from 2022.
> > 
> > > * 75fd6485cccef269ac9eb3b71cf56753341195ef
> > 
> > This is from a newer series:
> > 	https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240123225111.1629405-3-sean.anderson@seco.com/
> > that I applied from there.
> > 
> > So how did it apply cleanly twice?
> 
> Apparently the series from 2024 is v3 from the older v2 one. For some reason
> only patch 2/4 from v2 got applied before. v3 seems to be a rebase where the
> apply went unnoticed but the patch is again part of the series :(
> 
> > > causing my board imx8mm-tqma8mqml-mba8mx.dts failing to probe USB phy:
> > > [   11.006720] usb_phy_generic usbphynop1: error -EPERM: could not get vbus regulator
> > > [   11.017817] usb_phy_generic: probe of usbphynop1 failed with error -1
> > > 
> > > Reverting/removing the patch fix my problem.
> > 
> > Which patch?  All of the ones in that last series?  If so, why did it
> > apply at all?
> 
> In my case I reverted 75fd6485cccef269ac9eb3b71cf56753341195ef from
> usb-next, because that very change has been applied with
> 03e607cbb2931374db1825f371e9c7f28526d3f4 already.

Can you send a patch that resolves this all properly?

thanks,

greg k-h