public inbox for linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add device links between tunneled USB3 devices and USB4 Host
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:02:35 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240625050235.GS1532424@black.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78a4acf4-4701-4d1c-8547-c8809761a452@amd.com>

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 01:41:09PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > > 
> > > So I think the problem is you will have an ordering dependency between the
> > > two drivers for when the link gets created.
> > > 
> > > Like if thunderbolt.ko loads you would end up with links to PCIe root port
> > > for tunneling as well as XHCI controller.
> > 
> > With this patch we only create links to PCIe Root/Downstream ports from
> > Thunderbolt side and the USB core will deal with the USB ones.
> > 
> > > Then xhci loads and you end up also adding links to individual ports.
> > > Would you remove the link to the controller?
> > 
> > See above.
> > 
> > > And if the order is the other way around you end up with a larger state
> > > machine.
> > > 
> > > How about PCIe core provides a helper to know whether or not a PCIe device
> > > will support the proprietary register?
> > 
> > I think the xHCI can be non-PCIe device too (Apple silicon for
> > instance). The links here are created dynamically and only if there is
> > need (and support from the hardware) so we can let the USB4 controller
> > enter D3hot if there is no USB 3.x tunnel needed.
> 
> When I replied I was under the presumption that the next version the link
> creation code for XHCI controller would stay in thunderbolt.ko and the XHCI
> port would be in xhci.ko.  But if you move both non-Intel and Intel cases to
> xhci.ko this should be totally fine.  If you can CC me on the next version
> of the series I'll get that tested for AMD case.

Sure, we will.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-25  5:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-19 13:03 [PATCH 0/4] Add device links between tunneled USB3 devices and USB4 Host Mathias Nyman
2024-06-19 13:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] xhci: Add USB4 tunnel detection for USB3 devices on Intel hosts Mathias Nyman
2024-06-19 13:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] usb: Add tunneled parameter to usb device structure Mathias Nyman
2024-06-19 13:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] usb: acpi: add device link between tunneled USB3 device and USB4 Host Interface Mathias Nyman
2024-06-19 13:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] thunderbolt: Don't create device link from USB4 Host Interface to USB3 xHC host Mathias Nyman
2024-06-20  6:41 ` [PATCH 0/4] Add device links between tunneled USB3 devices and USB4 Host Mika Westerberg
2024-06-20 18:36   ` Mario Limonciello
2024-06-21  6:19     ` Mika Westerberg
2024-06-21 16:30       ` Mario Limonciello
2024-06-24  4:59         ` Mika Westerberg
2024-06-24 18:41           ` Mario Limonciello
2024-06-25  5:02             ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2024-06-25 14:37           ` Mathias Nyman
2024-06-25 14:45             ` Mika Westerberg
2024-06-25 14:55               ` Mario Limonciello

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240625050235.GS1532424@black.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox