From: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] usb: xhci: Fix isochronous scheduling regression
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 11:47:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821114706.34b095b1.michal.pecio@gmail.com> (raw)
An isoc URB without URB_ISO_ASAP should be scheduled immediately after
the previous one, unless it's the first submission or prior URBs have
completed without resubmitting and the endpoint became idle.
An HCD_BH driver must consider URBs pending completion in the BH queue
in addition to its own queue. Regrettably, core doesn't provide much
information, we can only know if we are being called by completion now.
This issue is as old as HCD_BH, affects ehci-hcd too and has no known
reproducible impact, as drivers generally resubmit from completion.
A recent patch tried to address it by looking at xHCI HW state instead.
Obviously, HW has no knowledge of the BH giveback queue either, and the
whole solution amounts to testing whether prior URBs have been unlinked
instead of completing normally - then a new stream is assumed.
This leads to false negatives when a driver simply allows the endpoint
to empty out and begins a new stream. New URBs are scheduled into the
past and promptly fail with -EXDEV status, causing data loss and worse,
because drivers get confused by premature completion, particularly when
multiple endpoints are started at once and required to stay in sync.
snd-usb-audio underruns the OUT endpoint when userspace fails to supply
playback data in time. If this is detected in duplex mode, IN URBs are
unlinked and both streams restarted. OUT underruns again before IN even
begins, another recovery is attempted and the cycle repeats.
Fix this by using the best criteria we can muster, taken from ehci-hcd.
This brings false negative rate back to zero and false positive rate to
less than ever before in xhci-hcd. Traditional logic was equivalent to:
if (list_empty(&ep_ring->td_list) ||
GET_EP_CTX_STATE(ep_ctx) != EP_STATE_RUNNING)
// consider this URB a new stream
While free of false negatives, it had easily avoidable false positives:
* no check for completion in progress when the list is empty
* the ep_ctx check doesn't make up for it at all, but it adds a race -
EP state can remain "stopped" for a while after the first submission
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20260813005635.34750f8c.michal.pecio@gmail.com/
Fixes: add8469b3e00 ("xhci: fix frame id calculation and checks for isoc URBs")
Signed-off-by: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
index f27bc132d0e9..8b0c27d6f12d 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
@@ -4311,10 +4311,11 @@ int xhci_queue_isoc_tx_prepare(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, gfp_t mem_flags,
check_interval(urb, ep_ctx);
/*
- * Check if this starts the isoc data flow. Relies on hw setting ep ctx
- * state after doorbell ring. Consider adding list_empty(td_list) check
+ * Schedule the URB discontiguously if all previous URBs have completed.
+ * XXX core can't tell if completions are pending but not running yet.
*/
- if (GET_EP_CTX_STATE(ep_ctx) != EP_STATE_RUNNING)
+ if (list_empty(&ep_ring->td_list) &&
+ !hcd_periodic_completion_in_progress(xhci_to_hcd(xhci), urb->ep))
xep->next_uframe = -1;
return xhci_queue_isoc_tx(xhci, mem_flags, urb, slot_id, ep_index);
--
2.48.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 9:47 Michal Pecio [this message]
2026-08-21 12:05 ` [PATCH] usb: xhci: Fix isochronous scheduling regression Mathias Nyman
2026-08-21 14:46 ` Michal Pecio
2026-08-21 14:44 ` Alan Stern
2026-08-21 16:03 ` Michal Pecio
2026-08-22 2:38 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260821114706.34b095b1.michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--to=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox