From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: xhci: Fix isochronous scheduling regression
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 15:05:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6804ed57-8405-4310-a64f-20c400bffde0@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821114706.34b095b1.michal.pecio@gmail.com>
On 8/21/26 12:47, Michal Pecio wrote:
> An isoc URB without URB_ISO_ASAP should be scheduled immediately after
> the previous one, unless it's the first submission or prior URBs have
> completed without resubmitting and the endpoint became idle.
>
> An HCD_BH driver must consider URBs pending completion in the BH queue
> in addition to its own queue. Regrettably, core doesn't provide much
> information, we can only know if we are being called by completion now.
> This issue is as old as HCD_BH, affects ehci-hcd too and has no known
> reproducible impact, as drivers generally resubmit from completion.
>
> A recent patch tried to address it by looking at xHCI HW state instead.
> Obviously, HW has no knowledge of the BH giveback queue either, and the
> whole solution amounts to testing whether prior URBs have been unlinked
> instead of completing normally - then a new stream is assumed.
>
> This leads to false negatives when a driver simply allows the endpoint
> to empty out and begins a new stream. New URBs are scheduled into the
> past and promptly fail with -EXDEV status, causing data loss and worse,
> because drivers get confused by premature completion, particularly when
> multiple endpoints are started at once and required to stay in sync.
>
> snd-usb-audio underruns the OUT endpoint when userspace fails to supply
> playback data in time. If this is detected in duplex mode, IN URBs are
> unlinked and both streams restarted. OUT underruns again before IN even
> begins, another recovery is attempted and the cycle repeats.
>
> Fix this by using the best criteria we can muster, taken from ehci-hcd.
> This brings false negative rate back to zero and false positive rate to
> less than ever before in xhci-hcd. Traditional logic was equivalent to:
>
> if (list_empty(&ep_ring->td_list) ||
> GET_EP_CTX_STATE(ep_ctx) != EP_STATE_RUNNING)
> // consider this URB a new stream
>
> While free of false negatives, it had easily avoidable false positives:
> * no check for completion in progress when the list is empty
> * the ep_ctx check doesn't make up for it at all, but it adds a race -
> EP state can remain "stopped" for a while after the first submission
I would still prefer:
if (list_empty(&ep_ring->td_list) && GET_EP_CTX_STATE(ep_ctx) != EP_STATE_RUNNING)
to detect the start of a new isoch stream.
It has zero false positives mid stream, and fixes the "stopped" state race case.
I can't figure out when the false negatives it introduces is an issue.
If you can show me a usecase where a driver or specification is designed to let an
isoch endpoint intentionally run dry, leaving it in running/idle, and then continue
queuing URBs expecting ASAP scheduling, then we can change it.
UAC and UVC go to altsetting 0 and drop the isoch endpoint on stop/pause (says AI)
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20260813005635.34750f8c.michal.pecio@gmail.com/
> Fixes: add8469b3e00 ("xhci: fix frame id calculation and checks for isoc URBs")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> index f27bc132d0e9..8b0c27d6f12d 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> @@ -4311,10 +4311,11 @@ int xhci_queue_isoc_tx_prepare(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, gfp_t mem_flags,
> check_interval(urb, ep_ctx);
>
> /*
> - * Check if this starts the isoc data flow. Relies on hw setting ep ctx
> - * state after doorbell ring. Consider adding list_empty(td_list) check
> + * Schedule the URB discontiguously if all previous URBs have completed.
> + * XXX core can't tell if completions are pending but not running yet.
> */
> - if (GET_EP_CTX_STATE(ep_ctx) != EP_STATE_RUNNING)
> + if (list_empty(&ep_ring->td_list) &&
> + !hcd_periodic_completion_in_progress(xhci_to_hcd(xhci), urb->ep))
> xep->next_uframe = -1;
I don't know why we intentionally should introduce the false positive case,
hiding a known issue.
At least we should add a debug message so audio/video developers can find the reason for
the glitches:
if (list_empty(&ep_ring->td_list) &&
!hcd_periodic_completion_in_progress(xhci_to_hcd(xhci), urb->ep)) {
if (GET_EP_CTX_STATE(ep_ctx) == EP_STATE_RUNNING)
xhci_dbg(xhci, "Starting new isoc stream on running endpoint at uframe %d, killing sync...
xep->next_uframe = -1;
}
Thanks
Mathias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 9:47 [PATCH] usb: xhci: Fix isochronous scheduling regression Michal Pecio
2026-08-21 12:05 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2026-08-21 14:46 ` Michal Pecio
2026-08-21 14:44 ` Alan Stern
2026-08-21 16:03 ` Michal Pecio
2026-08-22 2:38 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6804ed57-8405-4310-a64f-20c400bffde0@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox