From: JC Kuo <jckuo@nvidia.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
<linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xhci: tegra: mbox registers address in"soc" data
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 15:59:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c9090571-8336-1473-751b-e4a61569076c@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190902075723.GD930@ulmo>
Thanks for review. I will modify accordingly and submit again.
On 9/2/19 3:57 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:54:45AM +0800, JC Kuo wrote:
>> Tegra194 XUSB host controller has rearranged mailbox registers. This
>> commit makes mailbox registers address a part of "soc" data so that
>> xhci-tegra driver can be used for Tegra194.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: JC Kuo <jckuo@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> I'd perhaps reformulate the subject a little to be something like:
>
> xhci: tegra: Parameterize mailbox register addresses
>
> Two other minor comments below.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c
>> index dafc65911fc0..b92a03bbbd2c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c
>> @@ -146,6 +146,13 @@ struct tegra_xusb_phy_type {
>> unsigned int num;
>> };
>>
>> +struct tega_xusb_mbox_regs {
>> + u32 cmd;
>> + u32 data_in;
>> + u32 data_out;
>> + u32 owner;
>> +};
>
> Perhaps make these unsigned int (or unsigned long). Making these
> explicitly sized variables suggests (at least to me) that they are
> register values, whereas they really are offsets. So I prefer to use
> "unsized" types to distinguish between register offsets and values.
>
>> +
>> struct tegra_xusb_soc {
>> const char *firmware;
>> const char * const *supply_names;
>> @@ -160,6 +167,8 @@ struct tegra_xusb_soc {
>> } usb2, ulpi, hsic, usb3;
>> } ports;
>>
>> + struct tega_xusb_mbox_regs mbox;
>> +
>> bool scale_ss_clock;
>> bool has_ipfs;
>> };
>> @@ -395,15 +404,15 @@ static int tegra_xusb_mbox_send(struct tegra_xusb *tegra,
>> * ACK/NAK messages.
>> */
>> if (!(msg->cmd == MBOX_CMD_ACK || msg->cmd == MBOX_CMD_NAK)) {
>> - value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER);
>> + value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.owner);
>> if (value != MBOX_OWNER_NONE) {
>> dev_err(tegra->dev, "mailbox is busy\n");
>> return -EBUSY;
>> }
>>
>> - fpci_writel(tegra, MBOX_OWNER_SW, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER);
>> + fpci_writel(tegra, MBOX_OWNER_SW, tegra->soc->mbox.owner);
>>
>> - value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER);
>> + value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.owner);
>> if (value != MBOX_OWNER_SW) {
>> dev_err(tegra->dev, "failed to acquire mailbox\n");
>> return -EBUSY;
>> @@ -413,17 +422,17 @@ static int tegra_xusb_mbox_send(struct tegra_xusb *tegra,
>> }
>>
>> value = tegra_xusb_mbox_pack(msg);
>> - fpci_writel(tegra, value, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_IN);
>> + fpci_writel(tegra, value, tegra->soc->mbox.data_in);
>>
>> - value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD);
>> + value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.cmd);
>> value |= MBOX_INT_EN | MBOX_DEST_FALC;
>> - fpci_writel(tegra, value, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD);
>> + fpci_writel(tegra, value, tegra->soc->mbox.cmd);
>>
>> if (wait_for_idle) {
>> unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(250);
>>
>> while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
>> - value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER);
>> + value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.owner);
>> if (value == MBOX_OWNER_NONE)
>> break;
>>
>> @@ -431,7 +440,7 @@ static int tegra_xusb_mbox_send(struct tegra_xusb *tegra,
>> }
>>
>> if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
>> - value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER);
>> + value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.owner);
>>
>> if (value != MBOX_OWNER_NONE)
>> return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> @@ -598,16 +607,16 @@ static irqreturn_t tegra_xusb_mbox_thread(int irq, void *data)
>>
>> mutex_lock(&tegra->lock);
>>
>> - value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_OUT);
>> + value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.data_out);
>> tegra_xusb_mbox_unpack(&msg, value);
>>
>> - value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD);
>> + value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.cmd);
>> value &= ~MBOX_DEST_SMI;
>> - fpci_writel(tegra, value, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD);
>> + fpci_writel(tegra, value, tegra->soc->mbox.cmd);
>>
>> /* clear mailbox owner if no ACK/NAK is required */
>> if (!tegra_xusb_mbox_cmd_requires_ack(msg.cmd))
>> - fpci_writel(tegra, MBOX_OWNER_NONE, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER);
>> + fpci_writel(tegra, MBOX_OWNER_NONE, tegra->soc->mbox.owner);
>>
>> tegra_xusb_mbox_handle(tegra, &msg);
>>
>> @@ -1365,6 +1374,12 @@ static const struct tegra_xusb_soc tegra124_soc = {
>> },
>> .scale_ss_clock = true,
>> .has_ipfs = true,
>> + .mbox = {
>> + .cmd = XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD,
>> + .data_in = XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_IN,
>> + .data_out = XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_OUT,
>> + .owner = XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER,
>> + },
>> };
>> MODULE_FIRMWARE("nvidia/tegra124/xusb.bin");
>>
>> @@ -1397,6 +1412,12 @@ static const struct tegra_xusb_soc tegra210_soc = {
>> },
>> .scale_ss_clock = false,
>> .has_ipfs = true,
>> + .mbox = {
>> + .cmd = XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD,
>> + .data_in = XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_IN,
>> + .data_out = XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_OUT,
>> + .owner = XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER,
>> + },
>> };
>> MODULE_FIRMWARE("nvidia/tegra210/xusb.bin");
>>
>> @@ -1422,6 +1443,12 @@ static const struct tegra_xusb_soc tegra186_soc = {
>> },
>> .scale_ss_clock = false,
>> .has_ipfs = false,
>> + .mbox = {
>> + .cmd = XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD,
>> + .data_in = XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_IN,
>> + .data_out = XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_OUT,
>> + .owner = XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER,
>> + },
>
> You're already giving these registers names via the new parameters, so I
> don't think we need the symbolic names. This usually just leads to weird
> things like:
>
> #define XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD_T194 ...
> #define XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_IN_T194 ...
> #define XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_OUT_T194 ...
> #define XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER_T194 ...
>
> .mbox = {
> .cmd = XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD_T194,
> .data_in = XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_IN_T194,
> .data_out = XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_OUT_T194,
> .owner = XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER_T194,
> },
>
> Just remove the symbolic names and use the literal address in the
> structure definition.
>
> Thierry
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-02 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-02 3:54 [PATCH] xhci: tegra: mbox registers address in"soc" data JC Kuo
2019-09-02 7:57 ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-02 7:59 ` JC Kuo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c9090571-8336-1473-751b-e4a61569076c@nvidia.com \
--to=jckuo@nvidia.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox