From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Raul E Rangel" <rrangel@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] usbip: vhci_hcd: reject URBs from stale usb_device after port re-attach
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 15:17:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-180428@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021150704.3129446-7-rrangel@chromium.org>
> After vhci_shutdown_connection() runs, event_handler() immediately
> calls vhci_device_reset(), setting vdev->ud.status to VDEV_ST_NULL and
> clearing vdev->udev before usb_hub_wq finishes running usb_disconnect()
> on the detached usb_device.
>
> If attach_store() attaches a new connection to the same rhport before
> usb_hub_wq disconnects the old usb_device, vdev->ud.tcp_socket becomes
> non-NULL and vdev->ud.status becomes VDEV_ST_NOTASSIGNED. Because
> vhci_urb_enqueue() maps urb->dev->portnum to vdev without verifying that
> urb->dev matches vdev->udev, URBs submitted on the old usb_device pass
> the connection state checks and get sent to the new remote device (or,
> if a concurrent USBDEVFS_RESET resets the old usb_device to address 0,
> overwrite vdev->udev).
>
> Serialize vdev->udev clearing in vhci_device_reset() under vhci->lock
> and ud->lock (dropping old usb_device and socket references outside the
> spinlocks in both vhci_device_reset() and vhci_urb_enqueue()), and
> reject URBs in vhci_urb_enqueue() when urb->dev != vdev->udev and either
> usb_pipedevice(urb->pipe) != 0 or urb->dev is already registered
> (device_is_registered(&urb->dev->dev)). During initial enumeration and
> PORT_INIT_TRIES retries in hub_port_connect(), each candidate usb_device
> is unregistered until usb_new_device() runs after hub_port_init() has
> assigned vdev->udev, whereas an already-registered usb_device resetting
> via usb_reset_device() is only valid when urb->dev == vdev->udev.
>
> Fixes: 04679b3489e0 ("Staging: USB/IP: add client driver")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: Gemini
> Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261021150704.3129446-1-rrangel@chromium.org?part=6
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-21 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-21 15:06 [PATCH 0/6] usbip: vhci_hcd: fix URB giveback leaks and disconnect races Raul E Rangel
2026-10-21 15:06 ` [PATCH 1/6] usbip: vhci_hcd: protect urb->hcpriv with priv_lock in vhci_urb_dequeue() Raul E Rangel
2026-10-21 15:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 15:06 ` [PATCH 2/6] usbip: vhci_hcd: complete unsent URBs locally " Raul E Rangel
2026-10-21 15:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 15:06 ` [PATCH 3/6] usbip: vhci_hcd: stop enqueue and drain all pending URBs on disconnect Raul E Rangel
2026-10-21 15:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 15:06 ` [PATCH 4/6] usbip: vhci_hcd: clear URB_DMA_MAP_SG on all giveback paths Raul E Rangel
2026-10-21 15:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 15:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] usbip: vhci_hcd: allocate vhci_priv outside lock and handle ENOMEM Raul E Rangel
2026-10-21 15:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 15:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] usbip: vhci_hcd: reject URBs from stale usb_device after port re-attach Raul E Rangel
2026-10-21 15:17 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-180428@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rrangel@chromium.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox