* [PATCH v2] usb: musb: gadget: don't flush a waiting RX packet when queueing a request
@ 2026-11-07 10:55 Elvira Khabirova
2026-11-07 11:30 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Elvira Khabirova @ 2026-11-07 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bin Liu, Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Hubert Wiśniewski, linux-usb, linux-kernel, Elvira Khabirova
Since commit 3fc137386c46 ("usb: musb: Fix hardware lockup on first Rx
endpoint request"), musb_ep_restart() flushes the RX FIFO instead of
calling rxstate(), with the premise that in case of Ethernet, dropping
a couple of packets during gadget initialization is not an issue,
because it will only happen when the software is not yet ready.
But when using other functions with musb, for example, f_mass_storage
or f_acm, this code path will be used not only when the software is not
yet ready, but also mid-communication, and it will cause data loss.
Data loss happens on gadgets that don't always have requests queued
for an ep.
The timeline of a data loss:
1. A function that does not have a lot of requests pre-queued
completes an OUT request. The queue is empty.
2. The next packet comes. MUSB auto-acks it, places it into the FIFO,
sets RXPKTRDY, raises an interrupt.
3. musb_g_rx() is called, sees the request queue is empty,
early returns.
4. The function queues the next request (f_mass_storage does it from
the main fsg thread), musb_ep_restart does FLUSHFIFO, packet is lost.
5. The packet was auto-acked by MUSB, so it is not resent by the host.
Next data chunk arrives with an IRQ like so:
musb_g_rx returns, queue empty
(drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c:810)
musb_g_rx from musb_interrupt
(drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c:1786)
musb_interrupt from dsps_interrupt
(drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c:389)
and then it is dropped from the FIFO when usb_ep_queue() is called:
MUSB_RXCSR_FLUSHFIFO from musb_ep_restart
(drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c:1174)
musb_ep_restart from musb_ep_restart_resume_work
(drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c:1184)
musb_ep_restart_resume_work from musb_queue_resume_work
(drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c:2277)
musb_queue_resume_work from musb_gadget_queue
(drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c:1249)
musb_gadget_queue from usb_ep_queue
(drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c:306)
In case of f_mass_storage, it keeps waiting for the lost data;
the host then times out and resets the device. Since this is a race
condition, this can be seen as data transfers taking too long,
or as drives getting mounted but disappearing when data
is read/written, and so on.
usb 1-8.4: reset high-speed USB device number 31 using xhci_hcd
I/O error, dev sdb, sector 240 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x804800 phys_seg 30 prio class 2
Buffer I/O error on dev sdb, logical block 30, lost async page write
When testing f_acm, this is seen as byte loss on the tty. f_hid,
f_printer and f_fs lose data similarly.
Testing with commit 3fc137386c46 ("usb: musb: Fix hardware lockup on
first Rx endpoint request") reverted fixed these symptoms.
Move the data processing to system_bh_wq. Purpose of doing so is to
honor the usb_ep_queue docstring and to run in an interrupt context,
avoiding the lockup Hubert described in his commit message.
Alternative way of looking at this is it "re-triggers" the interrupt,
running the musb_g_rx that had to be skipped.
Such a change makes a different race condition more visible.
On SMP or PREEMPT_RT, the RX interrupt can come while musb_g_giveback()
is running on the same endpoint and has already dropped musb->lock;
before this patch, that would be possible only when usb_ep_dequeue()
runs in parallel with an interrupt, but after this patch,
it could be the workqueue item running when an interrupt comes.
Handling it at that moment could lead to packets getting stuck
never matched with their requests (locking up the device essentially)
or requests completing but out of order.
So in musb_g_rx() and musb_gadget_queue(), also defer the RX'd data
to a work item if ep->busy is set. The deferred work items are scheduled
when the last musb_g_giveback() finishes and busy drops to 0.
Do not do any deferral of DMA completion. When musb_g_rx() is called
with DMAENAB set, it means it's called from musb_dma_completion().
A DMA completion could not be happening at the same time as
a workqueue non-DMA giveback (because this DMA needed to be programmed
first, and programming of a DMA is only possible when all non-DMA
requests ahead in the request queue already got their givebacks).
And work items of DMA requests don't do givebacks.
Deferring DMA completion is more work, so just don't change
the behavior there.
DMA completion can still race with usb_ep_dequeue(), that's the same
as without this patch. So DMA situation should not become any worse.
The issue was reproduced and the patch was tested on a BeagleBone Black
(AM335x, one core, no RX DMA) with f_mass_storage, f_acm, f_hid, f_printer
and f_fs. It was also verified OK before and after this patch
with f_ecm and f_ncm.
This issue was also reproduced and the patch was tested on a Pine A64+
(Allwinner A64, four cores, no DMA) with both PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
and PREEMPT_RT, with lockdep enabled, with f_mass_storage, f_acm,
f_hid, f_printer and f_fs.
This patch was also tested with suspend to RAM on the Pine A64+,
both idle and during a transfer.
Fixes: 3fc137386c46 ("usb: musb: Fix hardware lockup on first Rx endpoint request")
Signed-off-by: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter0@gmail.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
- musb_g_rx_kick() does not re-queue itself when `busy` is set.
Instead, musb_g_giveback() re-queues it when `rx_kick_deferred`.
This new flag is set in three cases:
1) `busy` is set inside musb_g_rx_kick()
2) musb_gadget_queue() adds an RX request to an empty request queue
and `busy` is set
3) `busy` is set in the beginning of musb_g_rx() (addresses sashiko's
"RX endpoint lockup after giveback in musb_g_rx_kick()",
"softirq busy-loop and livelock in musb_g_rx_kick()", and
"race and ordering bug in musb_gadget_disable() for rx_kick")
- musb_g_rx_kick checks musb->is_runtime_suspended now and exits early
if the controller is suspended, and the work items are disabled
during system suspend (addresses sashiko's
"unushed rx_kick work in musb_suspend() accesses disabled MMIO")
- This time tested also on a Pine A64+ (Allwinner A64),
which has both MUSB and 4 cores.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20261027202744.79556-1-lineprinter0@gmail.com/
drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c | 3 +
drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.h | 9 +++
3 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
index 73ac25f53..38469727a 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
@@ -2818,6 +2818,8 @@ static int musb_suspend(struct device *dev)
;
musb->flush_irq_work = false;
+ musb_gadget_disable_rx_kicks(musb);
+
if (!(musb->ops->quirks & MUSB_PRESERVE_SESSION))
musb_writeb(musb->mregs, MUSB_DEVCTL, 0);
@@ -2866,6 +2868,7 @@ static int musb_resume(struct device *dev)
if ((devctl & mask) != (musb->context.devctl & mask))
musb->port1_status = 0;
+ musb_gadget_enable_rx_kicks(musb);
musb_enable_interrupts(musb);
musb_platform_enable(musb);
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c
index 016d3f3fc..c71c60efe 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c
@@ -148,6 +148,21 @@ __acquires(ep->musb->lock)
usb_gadget_giveback_request(&req->ep->end_point, &req->request);
spin_lock(&musb->lock);
ep->busy = busy;
+
+ if (!ep->busy && ep->rx_kick_deferred) {
+ ep->rx_kick_deferred = false;
+ if (!queue_work(system_bh_wq, &ep->rx_kick))
+ pm_runtime_put_noidle(musb->controller);
+ }
+}
+
+static void musb_g_defer_rx_kick(struct musb *musb, struct musb_ep *musb_ep)
+{
+ if (musb_ep->rx_kick_deferred)
+ return;
+
+ pm_runtime_get_noresume(musb->controller);
+ musb_ep->rx_kick_deferred = true;
}
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------- */
@@ -816,6 +831,17 @@ void musb_g_rx(struct musb *musb, u8 epnum)
csr = musb_readw(epio, MUSB_RXCSR);
dma = is_dma_capable() ? musb_ep->dma : NULL;
+ /*
+ * A giveback is in progress on this endpoint, so the packet can't be
+ * handled now: the function could get its data out of order. Check for
+ * the packet once the giveback is done.
+ * Do not defer DMA completions: only usb_ep_dequeue() can overlap them.
+ */
+ if (musb_ep->busy && !(csr & MUSB_RXCSR_DMAENAB)) {
+ musb_g_defer_rx_kick(musb, musb_ep);
+ return;
+ }
+
musb_dbg(musb, "<== %s, rxcsr %04x%s %p", musb_ep->end_point.name,
csr, dma ? " (dma)" : "", request);
@@ -1111,6 +1137,12 @@ static int musb_gadget_disable(struct usb_ep *ep)
/* abort all pending DMA and requests */
nuke(musb_ep, -ESHUTDOWN);
+ if (cancel_work(&musb_ep->rx_kick))
+ pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(musb->controller);
+ if (musb_ep->rx_kick_deferred) {
+ musb_ep->rx_kick_deferred = false;
+ pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(musb->controller);
+ }
musb_ep->desc = NULL;
musb_ep->end_point.desc = NULL;
@@ -1171,10 +1203,39 @@ void musb_ep_restart(struct musb *musb, struct musb_request *req)
txstate(musb, req);
} else {
csr = musb_readw(epio, MUSB_RXCSR);
- csr |= MUSB_RXCSR_FLUSHFIFO | MUSB_RXCSR_P_WZC_BITS;
- musb_writew(epio, MUSB_RXCSR, csr);
- musb_writew(epio, MUSB_RXCSR, csr);
+ if (csr & MUSB_RXCSR_RXPKTRDY) {
+ pm_runtime_get_noresume(musb->controller);
+ if (!queue_work(system_bh_wq, &req->ep->rx_kick))
+ pm_runtime_put_noidle(musb->controller);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static void musb_g_rx_kick(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct musb_ep *musb_ep = container_of(work, struct musb_ep, rx_kick);
+ struct musb *musb = musb_ep->musb;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ u8 epnum = musb_ep->current_epnum;
+ u16 csr;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&musb->lock, flags);
+
+ if (!musb_ep->desc || musb->is_runtime_suspended)
+ goto out;
+
+ if (musb_ep->busy) {
+ musb_g_defer_rx_kick(musb, musb_ep);
+ goto out;
}
+
+ musb_ep_select(musb->mregs, epnum);
+ csr = musb_readw(musb->endpoints[epnum].regs, MUSB_RXCSR);
+ if (csr & MUSB_RXCSR_RXPKTRDY)
+ musb_g_rx(musb, epnum);
+out:
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&musb->lock, flags);
+ pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(musb->controller);
}
static int musb_ep_restart_resume_work(struct musb *musb, void *data)
@@ -1254,6 +1315,15 @@ static int musb_gadget_queue(struct usb_ep *ep, struct usb_request *req,
__func__, status);
list_del(&request->list);
}
+ } else if (musb_ep->busy && !request->tx &&
+ &request->list == musb_ep->req_list.next) {
+ /*
+ * A giveback is in progress on this endpoint, so the request
+ * can't be started now. A packet may already be waiting, its
+ * interrupt having found no request. Check for the packet once
+ * the giveback is done.
+ */
+ musb_g_defer_rx_kick(musb, musb_ep);
}
unlock:
@@ -1701,6 +1771,7 @@ init_peripheral_ep(struct musb *musb, struct musb_ep *ep, u8 epnum, int is_in)
ep->is_in = is_in;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ep->req_list);
+ INIT_WORK(&ep->rx_kick, musb_g_rx_kick);
sprintf(ep->name, "ep%d%s", epnum,
(!epnum || hw_ep->is_shared_fifo) ? "" : (
@@ -1810,6 +1881,36 @@ void musb_gadget_cleanup(struct musb *musb)
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&musb->gadget_work);
usb_del_gadget_udc(&musb->g);
+
+ musb_gadget_disable_rx_kicks(musb);
+}
+
+static void musb_g_disable_rx_kick(struct musb *musb, struct musb_ep *musb_ep)
+{
+ if (musb_ep->rx_kick.func && disable_work_sync(&musb_ep->rx_kick))
+ pm_runtime_put_noidle(musb->controller);
+}
+
+void musb_gadget_disable_rx_kicks(struct musb *musb)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < musb->nr_endpoints; i++) {
+ musb_g_disable_rx_kick(musb, &musb->endpoints[i].ep_in);
+ musb_g_disable_rx_kick(musb, &musb->endpoints[i].ep_out);
+ }
+}
+
+void musb_gadget_enable_rx_kicks(struct musb *musb)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < musb->nr_endpoints; i++) {
+ if (musb->endpoints[i].ep_in.rx_kick.func)
+ enable_work(&musb->endpoints[i].ep_in.rx_kick);
+ if (musb->endpoints[i].ep_out.rx_kick.func)
+ enable_work(&musb->endpoints[i].ep_out.rx_kick);
+ }
}
/*
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.h b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.h
index f49f25b3b..886cfc26d 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.h
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.h
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#define __MUSB_GADGET_H
#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_MUSB_GADGET) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_MUSB_DUAL_ROLE)
extern irqreturn_t musb_g_ep0_irq(struct musb *);
@@ -23,6 +24,8 @@ extern void musb_g_wakeup(struct musb *);
extern void musb_g_disconnect(struct musb *);
extern void musb_gadget_cleanup(struct musb *);
extern int musb_gadget_setup(struct musb *);
+void musb_gadget_disable_rx_kicks(struct musb *musb);
+void musb_gadget_enable_rx_kicks(struct musb *musb);
#else
static inline irqreturn_t musb_g_ep0_irq(struct musb *musb)
@@ -42,6 +45,9 @@ static inline int musb_gadget_setup(struct musb *musb)
{
return 0;
}
+
+static inline void musb_gadget_disable_rx_kicks(struct musb *musb) {}
+static inline void musb_gadget_enable_rx_kicks(struct musb *musb) {}
#endif
enum buffer_map_state {
@@ -93,6 +99,9 @@ struct musb_ep {
/* true if lock must be dropped but req_list may not be advanced */
u8 busy;
+ struct work_struct rx_kick;
+ bool rx_kick_deferred;
+
u8 hb_mult;
};
base-commit: c339f4010dea8b0d754f84ace70cd1b089878ef8
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] usb: musb: gadget: don't flush a waiting RX packet when queueing a request
2026-11-07 10:55 [PATCH v2] usb: musb: gadget: don't flush a waiting RX packet when queueing a request Elvira Khabirova
@ 2026-11-07 11:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 12:12 ` Elvira Khabirova
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-11-07 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Elvira Khabirova; +Cc: linux-usb
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential
issues to consider:
- [High] usb: musb: gadget: overlapping musb_g_giveback() calls wedge
ep->busy
- [High] usb: musb: gadget: race and ordering bug in
musb_gadget_disable() for rx_kick
- [Medium] usb: musb: gadget: lost rx_kick across system suspend and
resume
--
commit cef9b9e2278bf856fd53af421c899c0ae67866b7
Author: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter0@gmail.com>
usb: musb: gadget: don't flush a waiting RX packet when queueing a request
This commit replaces the RX FIFO flush in musb_ep_restart() with a
system_bh_wq work item that invokes musb_g_rx(), and defers RX processing
via ep->rx_kick_deferred while ep->busy is set.
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c
> index 016d3f3fc1e05..c71c60efe5106 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c
> @@ -148,6 +148,21 @@ __acquires(ep->musb->lock)
> usb_gadget_giveback_request(&req->ep->end_point, &req->request);
> spin_lock(&musb->lock);
> ep->busy = busy;
> +
> + if (!ep->busy && ep->rx_kick_deferred) {
> + ep->rx_kick_deferred = false;
> + if (!queue_work(system_bh_wq, &ep->rx_kick))
> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(musb->controller);
> + }
> +}
[Severity: High]
Can overlapping musb_g_giveback() calls finish out of LIFO order and leave
ep->busy permanently stuck at 1?
musb_g_giveback() saves ep->busy in a stack variable, sets ep->busy = 1,
and drops musb->lock around usb_gadget_giveback_request(). With RX
givebacks running in system_bh_wq, a second giveback on the same endpoint
(for example via musb_gadget_dequeue(), which enters musb_g_giveback()
when musb_ep->busy is set) can overlap on another CPU:
CPU0 CPU1
musb_g_rx_kick()
musb_g_rx()
musb_g_giveback()
busy = ep->busy; // 0
ep->busy = 1;
spin_unlock(&musb->lock)
usb_gadget_giveback_request()
musb_gadget_dequeue()
spin_lock_irqsave(&musb->lock, ...)
musb_g_giveback()
busy = ep->busy; // 1
ep->busy = 1;
spin_unlock(&musb->lock)
usb_gadget_giveback_request()
spin_lock(&musb->lock)
ep->busy = 0;
queue_work(..., &ep->rx_kick)
spin_unlock(&musb->lock)
spin_lock(&musb->lock)
ep->busy = 1; <-- stuck at 1
First, CPU0 clears ep->busy to 0 and schedules ep->rx_kick while CPU1 is
still in usb_gadget_giveback_request(). Second, when CPU1 finishes, it
writes its saved busy = 1 back to ep->busy. After that, every subsequent
musb_g_rx(), musb_g_rx_kick(), and musb_gadget_queue() call sees
ep->busy == 1 and defers work forever, wedging the endpoint and leaking
the runtime PM reference taken by musb_g_defer_rx_kick().
Making ep->busy an active giveback counter (incremented before dropping
musb->lock and decremented after re-acquiring it) would ensure ep->busy
only reaches 0 when the last giveback completes.
[ ... ]
> @@ -1111,6 +1137,12 @@ static int musb_gadget_disable(struct usb_ep *ep)
>
> /* abort all pending DMA and requests */
> nuke(musb_ep, -ESHUTDOWN);
> + if (cancel_work(&musb_ep->rx_kick))
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(musb->controller);
> + if (musb_ep->rx_kick_deferred) {
> + musb_ep->rx_kick_deferred = false;
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(musb->controller);
> + }
>
> musb_ep->desc = NULL;
> musb_ep->end_point.desc = NULL;
[Severity: High]
Can musb_g_rx_kick() run while nuke() drops musb->lock or after the
endpoint is re-enabled?
Because musb_ep->desc is cleared after nuke(), musb->lock is dropped
inside nuke() -> musb_g_giveback() while musb_ep->desc is still non-NULL.
If an earlier giveback on another CPU finishes during that window, it
restores ep->busy = 0 and queues ep->rx_kick, allowing musb_g_rx_kick() ->
musb_g_rx() -> rxstate() to run after nuke() has already freed
musb_ep->dma.
In addition, cancel_work() is non-synchronous:
CPU0 CPU1
<softirq>
musb_g_rx_kick()
// waiting for musb->lock
musb_gadget_disable()
spin_lock_irqsave(&musb->lock, ...)
cancel_work(&musb_ep->rx_kick) // false
musb_ep->desc = NULL;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&musb->lock, ...)
musb_gadget_enable()
spin_lock_irqsave(&musb->lock, ...)
musb_ep->desc = desc;
musb_ep->busy = 0;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&musb->lock, ...)
spin_lock_irqsave(&musb->lock, ...)
if (!musb_ep->desc || ...) // false
musb_g_rx() <-- stale kick runs
Clearing musb_ep->desc and musb_ep->end_point.desc before calling nuke()
prevents musb_g_rx_kick() and musb_gadget_queue() from acting on the
endpoint while nuke() drops musb->lock, and prevented stale kicks will see
the updated state if musb_gadget_enable() also cancels any pending
rx_kick.
[ ... ]
> @@ -1810,6 +1881,36 @@ void musb_gadget_cleanup(struct musb *musb)
>
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&musb->gadget_work);
> usb_del_gadget_udc(&musb->g);
> +
> + musb_gadget_disable_rx_kicks(musb);
> +}
> +
> +static void musb_g_disable_rx_kick(struct musb *musb, struct musb_ep *musb_ep)
> +{
> + if (musb_ep->rx_kick.func && disable_work_sync(&musb_ep->rx_kick))
> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(musb->controller);
> +}
> +
> +void musb_gadget_disable_rx_kicks(struct musb *musb)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < musb->nr_endpoints; i++) {
> + musb_g_disable_rx_kick(musb, &musb->endpoints[i].ep_in);
> + musb_g_disable_rx_kick(musb, &musb->endpoints[i].ep_out);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void musb_gadget_enable_rx_kicks(struct musb *musb)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < musb->nr_endpoints; i++) {
> + if (musb->endpoints[i].ep_in.rx_kick.func)
> + enable_work(&musb->endpoints[i].ep_in.rx_kick);
> + if (musb->endpoints[i].ep_out.rx_kick.func)
> + enable_work(&musb->endpoints[i].ep_out.rx_kick);
> + }
> }
[Severity: Medium]
Does musb_gadget_disable_rx_kicks() lose a pending or deferred rx_kick
across system suspend and resume?
If ep->rx_kick is pending when musb_suspend() calls disable_work_sync(),
the work item is cancelled and its runtime PM reference is dropped, or if
musb_g_rx_kick() is currently in musb_g_giveback() with
ep->rx_kick_deferred set, disable_work_sync() marks ep->rx_kick disabled
before waiting for completion so queue_work() in musb_g_giveback() fails.
On resume, musb_gadget_enable_rx_kicks() only calls enable_work(), which
does not re-queue the cancelled work. When the USB session is preserved
across suspend/resume (such as with MUSB_PRESERVE_SESSION or standby),
MUSB_RXCSR_RXPKTRDY remains set in hardware with no interrupt to
re-trigger it, stalling RX on the endpoint.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261107105505.6554-1-lineprinter0@gmail.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] usb: musb: gadget: don't flush a waiting RX packet when queueing a request
2026-11-07 11:30 ` sashiko-bot
@ 2026-11-07 12:12 ` Elvira Khabirova
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Elvira Khabirova @ 2026-11-07 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sashiko-reviews, Elvira Khabirova; +Cc: linux-usb
On Sat Nov 7, 2026 at 12:30 PM CET, sashiko-bot wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential
> issues to consider:
> - [High] usb: musb: gadget: overlapping musb_g_giveback() calls wedge
> ep->busy
> - [High] usb: musb: gadget: race and ordering bug in
> musb_gadget_disable() for rx_kick
> - [Medium] usb: musb: gadget: lost rx_kick across system suspend and
> resume
> --
>
> commit cef9b9e2278bf856fd53af421c899c0ae67866b7
> Author: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter0@gmail.com>
>
> usb: musb: gadget: don't flush a waiting RX packet when queueing a request
>
> This commit replaces the RX FIFO flush in musb_ep_restart() with a
> system_bh_wq work item that invokes musb_g_rx(), and defers RX processing
> via ep->rx_kick_deferred while ep->busy is set.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c
>> index 016d3f3fc1e05..c71c60efe5106 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c
>> @@ -148,6 +148,21 @@ __acquires(ep->musb->lock)
>> usb_gadget_giveback_request(&req->ep->end_point, &req->request);
>> spin_lock(&musb->lock);
>> ep->busy = busy;
>> +
>> + if (!ep->busy && ep->rx_kick_deferred) {
>> + ep->rx_kick_deferred = false;
>> + if (!queue_work(system_bh_wq, &ep->rx_kick))
>> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(musb->controller);
>> + }
>> +}
>
> [Severity: High]
> Can overlapping musb_g_giveback() calls finish out of LIFO order and leave
> ep->busy permanently stuck at 1?
>
> musb_g_giveback() saves ep->busy in a stack variable, sets ep->busy = 1,
> and drops musb->lock around usb_gadget_giveback_request(). With RX
> givebacks running in system_bh_wq, a second giveback on the same endpoint
> (for example via musb_gadget_dequeue(), which enters musb_g_giveback()
> when musb_ep->busy is set) can overlap on another CPU:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> musb_g_rx_kick()
> musb_g_rx()
> musb_g_giveback()
> busy = ep->busy; // 0
> ep->busy = 1;
> spin_unlock(&musb->lock)
> usb_gadget_giveback_request()
> musb_gadget_dequeue()
> spin_lock_irqsave(&musb->lock, ...)
> musb_g_giveback()
> busy = ep->busy; // 1
> ep->busy = 1;
> spin_unlock(&musb->lock)
> usb_gadget_giveback_request()
> spin_lock(&musb->lock)
> ep->busy = 0;
> queue_work(..., &ep->rx_kick)
> spin_unlock(&musb->lock)
> spin_lock(&musb->lock)
> ep->busy = 1; <-- stuck at 1
>
> First, CPU0 clears ep->busy to 0 and schedules ep->rx_kick while CPU1 is
> still in usb_gadget_giveback_request(). Second, when CPU1 finishes, it
> writes its saved busy = 1 back to ep->busy. After that, every subsequent
> musb_g_rx(), musb_g_rx_kick(), and musb_gadget_queue() call sees
> ep->busy == 1 and defers work forever, wedging the endpoint and leaking
> the runtime PM reference taken by musb_g_defer_rx_kick().
>
> Making ep->busy an active giveback counter (incremented before dropping
> musb->lock and decremented after re-acquiring it) would ensure ep->busy
> only reaches 0 when the last giveback completes.
Yes, that is possible, but this is a pre-existing bug. I even have
a separate patch prepared to make `busy` a counter instead of a flag.
This patch does not aggravate this problem.
The same race is possible between a dequeue and a HW IRQ.
>> @@ -1111,6 +1137,12 @@ static int musb_gadget_disable(struct usb_ep *ep)
>>
>> /* abort all pending DMA and requests */
>> nuke(musb_ep, -ESHUTDOWN);
>> + if (cancel_work(&musb_ep->rx_kick))
>> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(musb->controller);
>> + if (musb_ep->rx_kick_deferred) {
>> + musb_ep->rx_kick_deferred = false;
>> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(musb->controller);
>> + }
>>
>> musb_ep->desc = NULL;
>> musb_ep->end_point.desc = NULL;
>
> [Severity: High]
> Can musb_g_rx_kick() run while nuke() drops musb->lock or after the
> endpoint is re-enabled?
>
> Because musb_ep->desc is cleared after nuke(), musb->lock is dropped
> inside nuke() -> musb_g_giveback() while musb_ep->desc is still non-NULL.
> If an earlier giveback on another CPU finishes during that window, it
> restores ep->busy = 0 and queues ep->rx_kick, allowing musb_g_rx_kick() ->
> musb_g_rx() -> rxstate() to run after nuke() has already freed
> musb_ep->dma.
Good catch, and actually I think this can be resolved with making
ep->busy a counter instead.
I will send them together as a series for v3.
> In addition, cancel_work() is non-synchronous:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> <softirq>
> musb_g_rx_kick()
> // waiting for musb->lock
> musb_gadget_disable()
> spin_lock_irqsave(&musb->lock, ...)
> cancel_work(&musb_ep->rx_kick) // false
> musb_ep->desc = NULL;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&musb->lock, ...)
> musb_gadget_enable()
> spin_lock_irqsave(&musb->lock, ...)
> musb_ep->desc = desc;
> musb_ep->busy = 0;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&musb->lock, ...)
> spin_lock_irqsave(&musb->lock, ...)
> if (!musb_ep->desc || ...) // false
> musb_g_rx() <-- stale kick runs
>
> Clearing musb_ep->desc and musb_ep->end_point.desc before calling nuke()
> prevents musb_g_rx_kick() and musb_gadget_queue() from acting on the
> endpoint while nuke() drops musb->lock, and prevented stale kicks will see
> the updated state if musb_gadget_enable() also cancels any pending
> rx_kick.
Is this any different from before the patch, with a HW IRQ?
I think a stale kick handles everything well, if there is no work,
musb_g_rx() just returns.
>> @@ -1810,6 +1881,36 @@ void musb_gadget_cleanup(struct musb *musb)
>>
>> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&musb->gadget_work);
>> usb_del_gadget_udc(&musb->g);
>> +
>> + musb_gadget_disable_rx_kicks(musb);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void musb_g_disable_rx_kick(struct musb *musb, struct musb_ep *musb_ep)
>> +{
>> + if (musb_ep->rx_kick.func && disable_work_sync(&musb_ep->rx_kick))
>> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(musb->controller);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void musb_gadget_disable_rx_kicks(struct musb *musb)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < musb->nr_endpoints; i++) {
>> + musb_g_disable_rx_kick(musb, &musb->endpoints[i].ep_in);
>> + musb_g_disable_rx_kick(musb, &musb->endpoints[i].ep_out);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +void musb_gadget_enable_rx_kicks(struct musb *musb)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < musb->nr_endpoints; i++) {
>> + if (musb->endpoints[i].ep_in.rx_kick.func)
>> + enable_work(&musb->endpoints[i].ep_in.rx_kick);
>> + if (musb->endpoints[i].ep_out.rx_kick.func)
>> + enable_work(&musb->endpoints[i].ep_out.rx_kick);
>> + }
>> }
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Does musb_gadget_disable_rx_kicks() lose a pending or deferred rx_kick
> across system suspend and resume?
>
> If ep->rx_kick is pending when musb_suspend() calls disable_work_sync(),
> the work item is cancelled and its runtime PM reference is dropped, or if
> musb_g_rx_kick() is currently in musb_g_giveback() with
> ep->rx_kick_deferred set, disable_work_sync() marks ep->rx_kick disabled
> before waiting for completion so queue_work() in musb_g_giveback() fails.
> On resume, musb_gadget_enable_rx_kicks() only calls enable_work(), which
> does not re-queue the cancelled work. When the USB session is preserved
> across suspend/resume (such as with MUSB_PRESERVE_SESSION or standby),
> MUSB_RXCSR_RXPKTRDY remains set in hardware with no interrupt to
> re-trigger it, stalling RX on the endpoint.
I see, I wish I had more hardware to test on.
This seems to be possible on da8xx.
I will find a way to re-queue the cancelled work items for v3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-07 12:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-07 10:55 [PATCH v2] usb: musb: gadget: don't flush a waiting RX packet when queueing a request Elvira Khabirova
2026-11-07 11:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 12:12 ` Elvira Khabirova
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox