Linux Watchdog driver development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V1 RESEND] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Fix PMU register bits for ExynosAutoV920 SoC
       [not found] <CGME20250226065213epcas2p37d44b987d5bc913cf5f9d5800ff9df8e@epcas2p3.samsung.com>
@ 2025-02-26  6:52 ` sw617.shin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: sw617.shin @ 2025-02-26  6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Alim Akhtar', krzk, wim, linux
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-watchdog, linux-kernel,
	'Kyunghwan Seo'

This is a friendly reminder for this patch.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2025 1:56 PM
> To: 'Sangwook Shin' <sw617.shin@samsung.com>; krzk@kernel.org; wim@linux-
> watchdog.org; linux@roeck-us.net
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
> soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; 'Kyunghwan Seo' <khwan.seo@samsung.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Fix PMU register bits for
> ExynosAutoV920 SoC
> 
> Hello Sangwook
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sangwook Shin <sw617.shin@samsung.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2025 6:11 AM
> > To: krzk@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com; wim@linux-watchdog.org;
> > linux@roeck-us.net
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
> > soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Kyunghwan Seo <khwan.seo@samsung.com>;
> > Sangwook Shin <sw617.shin@samsung.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Fix PMU register bits for
> > ExynosAutoV920 SoC
> >
> > From: Kyunghwan Seo <khwan.seo@samsung.com>
> >
> > Fix the PMU register bits for the ExynosAutoV920 SoC.
> > This SoC has different bit information compared to its previous
> > version, ExynosAutoV9, and we have made the necessary adjustments.
> >
> > rst_stat_bit:
> >     - ExynosAutoV920 cl0 : 0
> >     - ExynosAutoV920 cl1 : 1
> >
> > cnt_en_bit:
> >     - ExynosAutoV920 cl0 : 8
> >     - ExynosAutoV920 cl1 : 8
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kyunghwan Seo <khwan.seo@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sangwook Shin <sw617.shin@samsung.com>
> > ---
> Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> 
> 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V1 RESEND] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Fix PMU register bits for ExynosAutoV920 SoC
       [not found] <CGME20250226072535epcas2p46d41cb5cdd7ece18c898657c3c66a219@epcas2p4.samsung.com>
@ 2025-02-26  7:21 ` Sangwook Shin
  2025-02-26  7:43   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sangwook Shin @ 2025-02-26  7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: krzk, alim.akhtar, wim, linux
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-watchdog, linux-kernel,
	Kyunghwan Seo, Sangwook Shin

From: Kyunghwan Seo <khwan.seo@samsung.com>

Fix the PMU register bits for the ExynosAutoV920 SoC.
This SoC has different bit information compared to its previous
version, ExynosAutoV9, and we have made the necessary adjustments.

rst_stat_bit:
    - ExynosAutoV920 cl0 : 0
    - ExynosAutoV920 cl1 : 1

cnt_en_bit:
    - ExynosAutoV920 cl0 : 8
    - ExynosAutoV920 cl1 : 8

Signed-off-by: Kyunghwan Seo <khwan.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sangwook Shin <sw617.shin@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
index 30450e99e5e9..bdd81d8074b2 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
@@ -72,6 +72,8 @@
 #define EXYNOS850_CLUSTER1_WDTRESET_BIT		23
 #define EXYNOSAUTOV9_CLUSTER0_WDTRESET_BIT	25
 #define EXYNOSAUTOV9_CLUSTER1_WDTRESET_BIT	24
+#define EXYNOSAUTOV920_CLUSTER0_WDTRESET_BIT	0
+#define EXYNOSAUTOV920_CLUSTER1_WDTRESET_BIT	1
 
 #define GS_CLUSTER0_NONCPU_OUT			0x1220
 #define GS_CLUSTER1_NONCPU_OUT			0x1420
@@ -312,9 +314,9 @@ static const struct s3c2410_wdt_variant drv_data_exynosautov920_cl0 = {
 	.mask_bit = 2,
 	.mask_reset_inv = true,
 	.rst_stat_reg = EXYNOS5_RST_STAT_REG_OFFSET,
-	.rst_stat_bit = EXYNOSAUTOV9_CLUSTER0_WDTRESET_BIT,
+	.rst_stat_bit = EXYNOSAUTOV920_CLUSTER0_WDTRESET_BIT,
 	.cnt_en_reg = EXYNOSAUTOV920_CLUSTER0_NONCPU_OUT,
-	.cnt_en_bit = 7,
+	.cnt_en_bit = 8,
 	.quirks = QUIRK_HAS_WTCLRINT_REG | QUIRK_HAS_PMU_MASK_RESET |
 		  QUIRK_HAS_PMU_RST_STAT | QUIRK_HAS_PMU_CNT_EN |
 		  QUIRK_HAS_DBGACK_BIT,
@@ -325,9 +327,9 @@ static const struct s3c2410_wdt_variant drv_data_exynosautov920_cl1 = {
 	.mask_bit = 2,
 	.mask_reset_inv = true,
 	.rst_stat_reg = EXYNOS5_RST_STAT_REG_OFFSET,
-	.rst_stat_bit = EXYNOSAUTOV9_CLUSTER1_WDTRESET_BIT,
+	.rst_stat_bit = EXYNOSAUTOV920_CLUSTER1_WDTRESET_BIT,
 	.cnt_en_reg = EXYNOSAUTOV920_CLUSTER1_NONCPU_OUT,
-	.cnt_en_bit = 7,
+	.cnt_en_bit = 8,
 	.quirks = QUIRK_HAS_WTCLRINT_REG | QUIRK_HAS_PMU_MASK_RESET |
 		  QUIRK_HAS_PMU_RST_STAT | QUIRK_HAS_PMU_CNT_EN |
 		  QUIRK_HAS_DBGACK_BIT,
-- 
2.40.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V1 RESEND] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Fix PMU register bits for ExynosAutoV920 SoC
  2025-02-26  7:21 ` Sangwook Shin
@ 2025-02-26  7:43   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2025-02-26  7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sangwook Shin, alim.akhtar, wim, linux
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-watchdog, linux-kernel,
	Kyunghwan Seo

On 26/02/2025 08:21, Sangwook Shin wrote:
> From: Kyunghwan Seo <khwan.seo@samsung.com>
> 
> Fix the PMU register bits for the ExynosAutoV920 SoC.
> This SoC has different bit information compared to its previous
> version, ExynosAutoV9, and we have made the necessary adjustments.
> 
> rst_stat_bit:
>     - ExynosAutoV920 cl0 : 0
>     - ExynosAutoV920 cl1 : 1
> 
> cnt_en_bit:
>     - ExynosAutoV920 cl0 : 8
>     - ExynosAutoV920 cl1 : 8
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kyunghwan Seo <khwan.seo@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sangwook Shin <sw617.shin@samsung.com>

Resending while ignoring all previous emails, so we should do the work
twice. If you ever wonder why your patches are not applied, you got answer.


<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
"received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>


Best regards,
Krzysztof

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-02-26  7:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <CGME20250226065213epcas2p37d44b987d5bc913cf5f9d5800ff9df8e@epcas2p3.samsung.com>
2025-02-26  6:52 ` [PATCH V1 RESEND] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Fix PMU register bits for ExynosAutoV920 SoC sw617.shin
     [not found] <CGME20250226072535epcas2p46d41cb5cdd7ece18c898657c3c66a219@epcas2p4.samsung.com>
2025-02-26  7:21 ` Sangwook Shin
2025-02-26  7:43   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox