From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@men.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
<linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@men.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] watchdog updates for Linux 3.13
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:57:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131023065759.GA24193@jtlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131023003541.GA2435@roeck-us.net>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 05:35:41PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> Hi Wim,
>
> This is v2 of my pull request. Please ignore the previous request.
> There are a couple of changes as outlined below, and I rebased the
> branch to 3.12-rc6.
>
> Please consider pulling watchdog updates for Linux 3.13 from signed tag:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git watchdog-for-wim
>
> The tag has been applied on top of the watchdog-next branch. The branch includes
> a number of patches I collected over the last few months. It does not include
> all submitted patches; only the ones I reviewed and felt comfortable with are
> included.
>
> I reviewed all patches and ran build tests as well as source verification tests
> with both smatch and spatch. The branch has been on my Linux repo for a while,
> so presumably Fenguang's robot will have built the code as well.
> The w83627hf patches have been running on several servers for more than a month
> without problems.
>
> You can find the most recent build results at
> http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders/watchdog-next.
>
> If you don't want to apply the entire series, please consider applying whatever
> subset you might feel comfortable with.
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
> ------
Hi Gunther,
Can you please drop the patch from me from the pull request? I'm afraid
something went wrong there, I thought Stephen Warren and I decided to just move
the binding document and not change the bindings, as the driver went upstream in
3.11.
But somehow I can't find his mail in the list archives. Maybe he accidently sent
it to me directly (and of cause I've already deleted it :-(, sorry ).
Should I re-send the move-patch, which was acked by Stephen? Or do you still
have it in an inbox?
Thanks a lot,
Johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-23 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-23 0:35 [GIT PULL v2] watchdog updates for Linux 3.13 Guenter Roeck
2013-10-23 6:57 ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2013-10-23 16:47 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-23 23:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-24 6:22 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2013-10-24 15:17 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-29 8:44 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131023065759.GA24193@jtlinux \
--to=johannes.thumshirn@men.de \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox