Re: [GIT PULL v2] watchdog updates for Linux 3.13

[Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>]

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 08:57:59AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 05:35:41PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> >
> > Hi Wim,
> >
> > This is v2 of my pull request. Please ignore the previous request.
> > There are a couple of changes as outlined below, and I rebased the
> > branch to 3.12-rc6.
> >
> > Please consider pulling watchdog updates for Linux 3.13 from signed tag:
> >
> >     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git watchdog-for-wim
> >
> > The tag has been applied on top of the watchdog-next branch. The branch includes
> > a number of patches I collected over the last few months. It does not include
> > all submitted patches; only the ones I reviewed and felt comfortable with are
> > included.
> >
> > I reviewed all patches and ran build tests as well as source verification tests
> > with both smatch and spatch. The branch has been on my Linux repo for a while,
> > so presumably Fenguang's robot will have built the code as well.
> > The w83627hf patches have been running on several servers for more than a month
> > without problems.
> >
> > You can find the most recent build results at
> > http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders/watchdog-next.
> >
> > If you don't want to apply the entire series, please consider applying whatever
> > subset you might feel comfortable with.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Guenter
> >
> > ------
> 
> Hi Gunther,
> 
> Can you please drop the patch from me from the pull request?  I'm afraid
> something went wrong there, I thought Stephen Warren and I decided to just move
> the binding document and not change the bindings, as the driver went upstream in
> 3.11.
> 
I ended up reverting your patch on top of my tree. Wim can either do the same
if/when he decides to pull the patches, or simply drop the patch before sending
his next pull request to Linus.

Thanks,
Guenter