From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: harald@ccbib.org
Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] watchdog: stmp3xxx: Implement GETBOOTSTATUS
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 20:31:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151001183131.GA10444@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c75c3f0a5a1a136bac7c882178b01815@imap.cosmopool.net>
Hi,
On 01/10/2015 at 19:20:32 +0200, harald@ccbib.org wrote :
> Since the rtc and watchdog drivers need different bits of the same control
> register, we would need to use regmap_fields to pass them around.
> Unfortunately this means we can't use the _SET and _CLR registers, which
> means we need to use regmap everywhere to get proper locking. A lot of
> overhead for no benefit.
>
> After reading lots of messages around the genesis and usage of
> regmap_mmio,
> it seems to me the intended usecases are to fix some endianness issues
> and to have a register cache available during suspend - both of which
> don't
> apply in this case.
>
I'd say one of the main advantage of regmap is that it does proper
locking of shared registers and I think that is the main reason of using
it when with platform drivers. Obviously, because you have _SET and _CLR
register on that platform you don't really care about locking.
> If you want to get rid of the callbacks we should just pass the pointer
> to the register block to the child device, I think. Which way is
> preferable
> is probably only a matter of taste so I won't override the driver authors
> decision unless there is some clear statement that this is the preferred
> style in the rtc subsystem.
>
Ok. Like I said, this is not blocking, it was just a cleanup I was
suggesting.
However, this device is clearly an MFD and that callback feels a bit
hackish. Also registering the watchdog would probably better be done
from the mfd subsystem (this is the only RTC driver doing so).
If you have a look at the history, this was a patch from 2011 taken in
2013 so the kernel had plenty of time to evolve in between ;)
We are dealing with legacy and I'm fine with that driver staying that
way until it is absolutely necessary to change it.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-01 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-08 19:45 [PATCH] watchdog: stmp3xxx: Implement GETBOOTSTATUS Harald Geyer
2015-04-17 9:30 ` [rtc-linux] " Alexandre Belloni
2015-04-19 13:41 ` harald
2015-04-19 15:37 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-04-20 7:11 ` harald
2015-05-05 9:40 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-10-01 17:20 ` harald
2015-10-01 18:31 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151001183131.GA10444@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=harald@ccbib.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox