From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Triet Hoang" <triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] watchdog: msc313e_wdt: Convert to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS()
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 06:20:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260826062035.7645D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826060839.203297-5-triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing platform_set_drvdata() or dev_set_drvdata() in the probe function leads to a guaranteed NULL pointer dereference during suspend/resume operations.
- [High] The driver accesses hardware registers without ensuring the required clock is enabled, which can lead to a synchronous bus fault.
--
commit 906c6a1c7ebc485b90aee7c86e2994040111e762
Author: Triet Hoang <triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com>
watchdog: msc313e_wdt: Convert to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS()
Convert deprecated SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS()
and pm_sleep_ptr(). This lets us drop the __maybe_unused annotations
from the resume callback.
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/msc313e_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/msc313e_wdt.c
> index 90171431fc594..b8edf85f10236 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/msc313e_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/msc313e_wdt.c
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static int msc313e_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return devm_watchdog_register_device(dev, &priv->wdev);
> }
>
> -static int __maybe_unused msc313e_wdt_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +static int msc313e_wdt_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct msc313e_wdt_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this result in a NULL
pointer dereference when the system suspends?
The PM core invokes msc313e_wdt_suspend() and passes the platform device as the
dev parameter. However, msc313e_wdt_probe() never calls platform_set_drvdata()
or dev_set_drvdata() for the platform device:
drivers/watchdog/msc313e_wdt.c:msc313e_wdt_probe() {
...
watchdog_set_drvdata(&priv->wdev, priv);
watchdog_init_timeout(&priv->wdev, timeout, dev);
watchdog_stop_on_reboot(&priv->wdev);
watchdog_stop_on_unregister(&priv->wdev);
return devm_watchdog_register_device(dev, &priv->wdev);
}
Because the driver data is uninitialized, dev_get_drvdata(dev) evaluates to
NULL. The callback then computes an offset into this NULL pointer via
&priv->wdev and passes it to watchdog_active(), which unconditionally
dereferences it via test_bit(WDOG_ACTIVE, &wdd->status), causing a fatal
page fault.
The identical NULL pointer dereference logic also executes on the resume path
in msc313e_wdt_resume().
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but does this driver access hardware
registers without ensuring the required clock is enabled?
The probe function reads from hardware registers without first calling
clk_prepare_enable(), which can crash if the clock is disabled by the
bootloader:
drivers/watchdog/msc313e_wdt.c:msc313e_wdt_probe() {
...
/* If the period is non-zero the WDT is running */
if (readw(priv->base + REG_WDT_MAX_PRD_L) | (readw(priv->base + REG_WDT_MAX_PRD_H) << 16))
set_bit(WDOG_HW_RUNNING, &priv->wdev.status);
...
}
Additionally, because the clock is never enabled in the probe function, when
the Common Clock Framework's late_initcall executes, it physically disables
the unreferenced clock. If the watchdog is already running at boot time, the
watchdog core will periodically call the background ping callback:
drivers/watchdog/msc313e_wdt.c:msc313e_wdt_ping() {
...
writew(1, priv->base + REG_WDT_CLR);
...
}
Writing to these unclocked watchdog registers will trigger a synchronous
bus fault.
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260826060839.203297-1-triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-26 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 6:08 [PATCH 0/8] watchdog: Convert drivers to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() Triet Hoang
2026-08-26 6:08 ` [PATCH 1/8] watchdog: cadence_wdt: Convert " Triet Hoang
2026-08-26 6:08 ` [PATCH 2/8] watchdog: da9062: " Triet Hoang
2026-08-27 7:42 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-08-27 13:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-26 6:08 ` [PATCH 3/8] watchdog: keembay_wdt: " Triet Hoang
2026-08-26 6:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 21:38 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-26 6:08 ` [PATCH 4/8] watchdog: msc313e_wdt: " Triet Hoang
2026-08-26 6:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-27 4:53 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-08-26 6:08 ` [PATCH 5/8] watchdog: of_xilinx_wdt: " Triet Hoang
2026-08-26 6:08 ` [PATCH 6/8] watchdog: pm8916_wdt: " Triet Hoang
2026-08-26 6:08 ` [PATCH 7/8] watchdog: sp805_wdt: " Triet Hoang
2026-08-26 6:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 6:08 ` [PATCH 8/8] watchdog: stmp3xxx_rtc_wdt: " Triet Hoang
2026-08-26 6:19 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260826062035.7645D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).