From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Triet Hoang <triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com>, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] watchdog: msc313e_wdt: Convert to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS()
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 04:53:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ao_CwKrBhJzA8NHH@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826062035.7645D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 06:20:35AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] Missing platform_set_drvdata() or dev_set_drvdata() in the probe function leads to a guaranteed NULL pointer dereference during suspend/resume operations.
> - [High] The driver accesses hardware registers without ensuring the required clock is enabled, which can lead to a synchronous bus fault.
They are real issues. Sent [1] for fixing if they are still relevant.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-watchdog/20260827044700.554333-1-tzungbi@kernel.org
> > -static int __maybe_unused msc313e_wdt_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > +static int msc313e_wdt_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > struct msc313e_wdt_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> [Severity: High]
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this result in a NULL
> pointer dereference when the system suspends?
>
> The PM core invokes msc313e_wdt_suspend() and passes the platform device as the
> dev parameter. However, msc313e_wdt_probe() never calls platform_set_drvdata()
> or dev_set_drvdata() for the platform device:
>
> drivers/watchdog/msc313e_wdt.c:msc313e_wdt_probe() {
> ...
> watchdog_set_drvdata(&priv->wdev, priv);
>
> watchdog_init_timeout(&priv->wdev, timeout, dev);
> watchdog_stop_on_reboot(&priv->wdev);
> watchdog_stop_on_unregister(&priv->wdev);
>
> return devm_watchdog_register_device(dev, &priv->wdev);
> }
>
> Because the driver data is uninitialized, dev_get_drvdata(dev) evaluates to
> NULL. The callback then computes an offset into this NULL pointer via
> &priv->wdev and passes it to watchdog_active(), which unconditionally
> dereferences it via test_bit(WDOG_ACTIVE, &wdd->status), causing a fatal
> page fault.
>
> The identical NULL pointer dereference logic also executes on the resume path
> in msc313e_wdt_resume().
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-watchdog/20260827044700.554333-2-tzungbi@kernel.org
> [Severity: High]
> This is also a pre-existing issue, but does this driver access hardware
> registers without ensuring the required clock is enabled?
>
> The probe function reads from hardware registers without first calling
> clk_prepare_enable(), which can crash if the clock is disabled by the
> bootloader:
>
> drivers/watchdog/msc313e_wdt.c:msc313e_wdt_probe() {
> ...
> /* If the period is non-zero the WDT is running */
> if (readw(priv->base + REG_WDT_MAX_PRD_L) | (readw(priv->base + REG_WDT_MAX_PRD_H) << 16))
> set_bit(WDOG_HW_RUNNING, &priv->wdev.status);
> ...
> }
>
> Additionally, because the clock is never enabled in the probe function, when
> the Common Clock Framework's late_initcall executes, it physically disables
> the unreferenced clock. If the watchdog is already running at boot time, the
> watchdog core will periodically call the background ping callback:
>
> drivers/watchdog/msc313e_wdt.c:msc313e_wdt_ping() {
> ...
> writew(1, priv->base + REG_WDT_CLR);
> ...
> }
>
> Writing to these unclocked watchdog registers will trigger a synchronous
> bus fault.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-watchdog/20260827044700.554333-3-tzungbi@kernel.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 6:08 [PATCH 0/8] watchdog: Convert drivers to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() Triet Hoang
2026-08-26 6:08 ` [PATCH 1/8] watchdog: cadence_wdt: Convert " Triet Hoang
2026-08-26 6:08 ` [PATCH 2/8] watchdog: da9062: " Triet Hoang
2026-08-27 7:42 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-08-27 13:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-26 6:08 ` [PATCH 3/8] watchdog: keembay_wdt: " Triet Hoang
2026-08-26 6:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 21:38 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-26 6:08 ` [PATCH 4/8] watchdog: msc313e_wdt: " Triet Hoang
2026-08-26 6:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-27 4:53 ` Tzung-Bi Shih [this message]
2026-08-26 6:08 ` [PATCH 5/8] watchdog: of_xilinx_wdt: " Triet Hoang
2026-08-26 6:08 ` [PATCH 6/8] watchdog: pm8916_wdt: " Triet Hoang
2026-08-26 6:08 ` [PATCH 7/8] watchdog: sp805_wdt: " Triet Hoang
2026-08-26 6:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 6:08 ` [PATCH 8/8] watchdog: stmp3xxx_rtc_wdt: " Triet Hoang
2026-08-26 6:19 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ao_CwKrBhJzA8NHH@google.com \
--to=tzungbi@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox