From: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>, <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] watchdog: rti_wdt: Add reaction control
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 09:08:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <299c363a-23c7-4522-b58c-100f49c4eece@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <953f78a8-3928-479d-8700-dfe1cea15454@roeck-us.net>
Hi Guenter, Andrew,
On 7/7/25 5:55 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2025 at 04:49:31PM -0500, Andrew Davis wrote:
>> On 7/7/25 3:58 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 07, 2025 at 01:00:02PM -0500, Judith Mendez wrote:
>>>> This allows to configure reaction between NMI and reset for WWD.
>>>>
>>>> On K3 SoC's other than AM62L SoC [0], watchdog reset output is routed
>>>> to the ESM module which can subsequently route the signal to safety
>>>> master or SoC reset. On AM62L, the watchdog reset output is routed
>>>> to the SoC HW reset block. So, add a new compatible for AM62l to add
>>>> SoC data and configure reaction to reset instead of NMI.
>>>>
>>>> [0] https://www.ti.com/product/AM62L
>>>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/watchdog/rti_wdt.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/rti_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/rti_wdt.c
>>>> index d1f9ce4100a8..c9ee443c70af 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/rti_wdt.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/rti_wdt.c
>>>> @@ -35,7 +35,8 @@
>>>> #define RTIWWDRXCTRL 0xa4
>>>> #define RTIWWDSIZECTRL 0xa8
>>>> -#define RTIWWDRX_NMI 0xa
>>>> +#define RTIWWDRXN_RST 0x5
>>>> +#define RTIWWDRXN_NMI 0xa
>>>> #define RTIWWDSIZE_50P 0x50
>>>> #define RTIWWDSIZE_25P 0x500
>>>> @@ -63,22 +64,29 @@
>>>> static int heartbeat;
>>>> +struct rti_wdt_data {
>>>> + bool reset;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> /*
>>>> * struct to hold data for each WDT device
>>>> * @base - base io address of WD device
>>>> * @freq - source clock frequency of WDT
>>>> * @wdd - hold watchdog device as is in WDT core
>>>> + * @data - hold configuration data
>>>> */
>>>> struct rti_wdt_device {
>>>> void __iomem *base;
>>>> unsigned long freq;
>>>> struct watchdog_device wdd;
>>>> + const struct rti_wdt_data *data;
>>>> };
>>>> static int rti_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
>>>> {
>>>> u32 timer_margin;
>>>> struct rti_wdt_device *wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdd);
>>>> + u8 reaction;
>>>> int ret;
>>>> ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wdd->parent);
>>>> @@ -101,8 +109,13 @@ static int rti_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
>>>> */
>>>> wdd->min_hw_heartbeat_ms = 520 * wdd->timeout + MAX_HW_ERROR;
>>>> - /* Generate NMI when wdt expires */
>>>> - writel_relaxed(RTIWWDRX_NMI, wdt->base + RTIWWDRXCTRL);
>>>> + /* Reset device if wdt serviced outside of window or generate NMI if available */
>>>
>>> Shouldn't that be "or generate NMI if _not_ available" ?
>>>
>>
>> For almost all the K3 devices, the WDT has two selectable outputs, one resets
>> the device directly, the other is this "NMI" which is wired to an ESM module
>> which can take other actions (but usually it just also resets the device).
>> For AM62L that second NMI output is not wired (no ESM module), so our only
>> choice is to set the WDT to direct reset mode.
>>
>> The wording is a little strange, but the "or generate NMI if available" meaning
>> if NMI is available, then do that. Reset being the fallback when _not_ available.
>>
>> Maybe this would work better:
>>
>> /* If WDT is serviced outside of window, generate NMI if available, or reset device */
>>
>
> The problem is that the code doesn't match the comment. The code checks the
> "reset" flag and requests a reset if available. If doesn't check an "nmi"
> flag.
>
> If the preference is NMI, as your comment suggests, the flag should be named
> "nmi" and be set if NMI is available. That would align the code and the
> comment. Right now both code and comment are misleading, since the presence
> of a reset flag (and setting it to false) suggests that a direct reset is
> not available, and that reset is preferred if available. A reset is the
> normally expected behavior for a watchdog, so the fact that this is _not_
> the case for this watchdog should be made more visible.
How about:
/* If WWDT serviced outside of window, generate NMI or reset the device
if NMI not available */
if (wdt->data->reset)
reaction = RTIWWDRXN_RST;
else
reaction = RTIWWDRXN_NMI;
~ Judith
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-10 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-07 18:00 [PATCH v3 0/2] Add reaction control in rti Judith Mendez
2025-07-07 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: ti,rti-wdt: Add ti,am62l-rti-wdt compatible Judith Mendez
2025-07-07 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] watchdog: rti_wdt: Add reaction control Judith Mendez
2025-07-07 20:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-07 21:49 ` Andrew Davis
2025-07-07 22:55 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-10 14:08 ` Judith Mendez [this message]
2025-07-16 18:47 ` Judith Mendez
2025-07-16 18:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-17 15:24 ` Judith Mendez
2025-07-17 16:44 ` Andrew Davis
2025-07-17 17:51 ` Judith Mendez
2025-07-17 20:10 ` Andrew Davis
2025-07-18 14:01 ` Judith Mendez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=299c363a-23c7-4522-b58c-100f49c4eece@ti.com \
--to=jm@ti.com \
--cc=afd@ti.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox