From: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
To: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>, <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] watchdog: rti_wdt: Add reaction control
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 11:44:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <92be34eb-2408-4273-9e37-bec0b0d68f10@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc095373-1171-4718-b492-8a74d03f99ba@ti.com>
On 7/17/25 10:24 AM, Judith Mendez wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On 7/16/25 1:50 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 7/10/25 07:08, Judith Mendez wrote:
>>> Hi Guenter, Andrew,
>>>
>>> On 7/7/25 5:55 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 07, 2025 at 04:49:31PM -0500, Andrew Davis wrote:
>>>>> On 7/7/25 3:58 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 07, 2025 at 01:00:02PM -0500, Judith Mendez wrote:
>>>>>>> This allows to configure reaction between NMI and reset for WWD.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On K3 SoC's other than AM62L SoC [0], watchdog reset output is routed
>>>>>>> to the ESM module which can subsequently route the signal to safety
>>>>>>> master or SoC reset. On AM62L, the watchdog reset output is routed
>>>>>>> to the SoC HW reset block. So, add a new compatible for AM62l to add
>>>>>>> SoC data and configure reaction to reset instead of NMI.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [0] https://www.ti.com/product/AM62L
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> drivers/watchdog/rti_wdt.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/rti_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/rti_wdt.c
>>>>>>> index d1f9ce4100a8..c9ee443c70af 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/rti_wdt.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/rti_wdt.c
>>>>>>> @@ -35,7 +35,8 @@
>>>>>>> #define RTIWWDRXCTRL 0xa4
>>>>>>> #define RTIWWDSIZECTRL 0xa8
>>>>>>> -#define RTIWWDRX_NMI 0xa
>>>>>>> +#define RTIWWDRXN_RST 0x5
>>>>>>> +#define RTIWWDRXN_NMI 0xa
>>>>>>> #define RTIWWDSIZE_50P 0x50
>>>>>>> #define RTIWWDSIZE_25P 0x500
>>>>>>> @@ -63,22 +64,29 @@
>>>>>>> static int heartbeat;
>>>>>>> +struct rti_wdt_data {
>>>>>>> + bool reset;
>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> /*
>>>>>>> * struct to hold data for each WDT device
>>>>>>> * @base - base io address of WD device
>>>>>>> * @freq - source clock frequency of WDT
>>>>>>> * @wdd - hold watchdog device as is in WDT core
>>>>>>> + * @data - hold configuration data
>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>> struct rti_wdt_device {
>>>>>>> void __iomem *base;
>>>>>>> unsigned long freq;
>>>>>>> struct watchdog_device wdd;
>>>>>>> + const struct rti_wdt_data *data;
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>> static int rti_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> u32 timer_margin;
>>>>>>> struct rti_wdt_device *wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdd);
>>>>>>> + u8 reaction;
>>>>>>> int ret;
>>>>>>> ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wdd->parent);
>>>>>>> @@ -101,8 +109,13 @@ static int rti_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>> wdd->min_hw_heartbeat_ms = 520 * wdd->timeout + MAX_HW_ERROR;
>>>>>>> - /* Generate NMI when wdt expires */
>>>>>>> - writel_relaxed(RTIWWDRX_NMI, wdt->base + RTIWWDRXCTRL);
>>>>>>> + /* Reset device if wdt serviced outside of window or generate NMI if available */
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shouldn't that be "or generate NMI if _not_ available" ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For almost all the K3 devices, the WDT has two selectable outputs, one resets
>>>>> the device directly, the other is this "NMI" which is wired to an ESM module
>>>>> which can take other actions (but usually it just also resets the device).
>>>>> For AM62L that second NMI output is not wired (no ESM module), so our only
>>>>> choice is to set the WDT to direct reset mode.
>>>>>
>>>>> The wording is a little strange, but the "or generate NMI if available" meaning
>>>>> if NMI is available, then do that. Reset being the fallback when _not_ available.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe this would work better:
>>>>>
>>>>> /* If WDT is serviced outside of window, generate NMI if available, or reset device */
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The problem is that the code doesn't match the comment. The code checks the
>>>> "reset" flag and requests a reset if available. If doesn't check an "nmi"
>>>> flag.
>>>>
>>>> If the preference is NMI, as your comment suggests, the flag should be named
>>>> "nmi" and be set if NMI is available. That would align the code and the
>>>> comment. Right now both code and comment are misleading, since the presence
>>>> of a reset flag (and setting it to false) suggests that a direct reset is
>>>> not available, and that reset is preferred if available. A reset is the
>>>> normally expected behavior for a watchdog, so the fact that this is _not_
>>>> the case for this watchdog should be made more visible.
>>>
>>>
>>> How about:
>>>
>>>
>>> /* If WWDT serviced outside of window, generate NMI or reset the device
>>> if NMI not available */
>>>
>>> if (wdt->data->reset)
>>> reaction = RTIWWDRXN_RST;
>>> else
>>> reaction = RTIWWDRXN_NMI;
>>>
>>
>> As I have said before, the problem is the "reset" flag. Its name suggests that
>> it means "reset is available". That is not what it actually means. It means
>> "NMI is not available". So I suggested to rename it to "nmi" or maybe "no_nmi".
>> Please educate me - why is that such a problem to name the flag to match its
>> meaning ?
>
> wdt->data->reset makes more sense because it shows there is a
> physical line routed to the MAIN RESET HW LOGIC:
>
> >> if (wdt->data->reset)
> >> reaction = RTIWWDRXN_RST;
> >> else
> >> reaction = RTIWWDRXN_NMI;
>
> If there is a direct reset line to MAIN RESET HW logic, then the
> reaction should be reset, if there is no reset line, then generate
> and NMI to ESM.
>
There is a reset line on all K3 devices, if you did it this way then
all devices would have wdt->data->reset set to true and you wouldn't
need this logic at all. The thing that changes is if NMI/ESM is
available or not, so as Guenter suggests the flag should be called
"nmi" or similar and you switch on that.
Andrew
> then the comment could be simplified to:
>
> /* If WWDT serviced outside of window, generate reset or NMI to ESM */
>
> to match the code better if you like.
>
> ~ Judith
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-17 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-07 18:00 [PATCH v3 0/2] Add reaction control in rti Judith Mendez
2025-07-07 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: ti,rti-wdt: Add ti,am62l-rti-wdt compatible Judith Mendez
2025-07-07 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] watchdog: rti_wdt: Add reaction control Judith Mendez
2025-07-07 20:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-07 21:49 ` Andrew Davis
2025-07-07 22:55 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-10 14:08 ` Judith Mendez
2025-07-16 18:47 ` Judith Mendez
2025-07-16 18:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-17 15:24 ` Judith Mendez
2025-07-17 16:44 ` Andrew Davis [this message]
2025-07-17 17:51 ` Judith Mendez
2025-07-17 20:10 ` Andrew Davis
2025-07-18 14:01 ` Judith Mendez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=92be34eb-2408-4273-9e37-bec0b0d68f10@ti.com \
--to=afd@ti.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jm@ti.com \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox