From: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>,
Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] driver/aspeed-wdt: fix pretimeout for counting down logic
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:41:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a33f86d-d82c-4685-8da7-5e623487a40c@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50ab5a0a-b807-4bd7-bda8-7c6f4bfc76fc@roeck-us.net>
Hi Guenter,
Thanks for your comments.
On 2025/2/18 13:33, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/17/25 19:16, Heyi Guo wrote:
>> Aspeed watchdog uses counting down logic, so the value set to register
>> should be the value of subtracting pretimeout from total timeout.
>>
>> Fixes: 9ec0b7e06835 ("watchdog: aspeed: Enable pre-timeout interrupt")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@linux.alibaba.com>
>>
>> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
>> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>> Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
>> Cc: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>
>> Cc: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/watchdog/aspeed_wdt.c | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/aspeed_wdt.c
>> b/drivers/watchdog/aspeed_wdt.c
>> index b4773a6aaf8c..520d8aba12a5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/aspeed_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/aspeed_wdt.c
>> @@ -187,6 +187,13 @@ static int aspeed_wdt_set_pretimeout(struct
>> watchdog_device *wdd,
>> u32 actual = pretimeout * WDT_RATE_1MHZ;
>> u32 s = wdt->cfg->irq_shift;
>> u32 m = wdt->cfg->irq_mask;
>> + u32 reload = readl(wdt->base + WDT_RELOAD_VALUE);
>> +
>
> It is unusual to use a register value here and not the configured timeout
> value. I would have assumed that pretimeout is compared against
> wdt->timout,
> not against the register value, and that the multiplication with
> WDT_RATE_1MHZ
> is done after validation. This needs an explanation.
It was supposed to be a straight-forward way to check if the pretimeout
value is supported by the hardware. I can change to wdt->timeout if it
is better.
Further, in the case of wdt->timeout > max_hw_heartbeat_ms, shall we
restrict the pretimeout to be larger than wdt->timeout -
max_hw_heartbeat_ms / 2? For the watchdog_kworker works in
max_hw_heartbeat_ms / 2 interval, pretimeout event may be triggered
unexpected when watchdog is not pinged in (max_hw_heartbeat_ms -
(timeout - pretimeout)).
>
>> + if (actual >= reload)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>
> On top of that, you'll also need to explain why
> watchdog_pretimeout_invalid()
> and with it the validation in watchdog_set_pretimeout() does not work
> for this
> watchdog and why this extra validation is necessary.
watchdog_pretimeout_invalid() will return false if wdt->timeout == 0,
but we can't determine the hardware pretimeout value if timeout == 0 here.
Thanks,
Heyi
>
> Guenter
>
>> + /* watchdog timer is counting down */
>> + actual = reload - actual;
>> wdd->pretimeout = pretimeout;
>> wdt->ctrl &= ~m;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-19 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-18 3:16 [PATCH 1/2] driver/aspeed-wdt: fix pretimeout for counting down logic Heyi Guo
2025-02-18 3:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: aspeed: aspeed-g6.dtsi: enable IRQ for watchdogs Heyi Guo
2025-02-18 7:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-19 1:12 ` Andrew Jeffery
2025-02-18 5:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] driver/aspeed-wdt: fix pretimeout for counting down logic Guenter Roeck
2025-02-19 1:25 ` Andrew Jeffery
2025-02-19 1:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-02-19 3:41 ` Heyi Guo [this message]
2025-02-19 6:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-02-19 6:48 ` Heyi Guo
[not found] ` <7e2c5f2c-d07a-472c-aae5-6b639a144d88@linux.alibaba.com>
2025-02-19 3:51 ` Heyi Guo
2025-02-19 0:42 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a33f86d-d82c-4685-8da7-5e623487a40c@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=guoheyi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=andrew@codeconstruct.com.au \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eajames@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox