Linux Watchdog driver development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
	Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
	Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>,
	Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] driver/aspeed-wdt: fix pretimeout for counting down logic
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:41:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a33f86d-d82c-4685-8da7-5e623487a40c@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50ab5a0a-b807-4bd7-bda8-7c6f4bfc76fc@roeck-us.net>

Hi Guenter,

Thanks for your comments.

On 2025/2/18 13:33, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/17/25 19:16, Heyi Guo wrote:
>> Aspeed watchdog uses counting down logic, so the value set to register
>> should be the value of subtracting pretimeout from total timeout.
>>
>> Fixes: 9ec0b7e06835 ("watchdog: aspeed: Enable pre-timeout interrupt")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@linux.alibaba.com>
>>
>> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
>> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>> Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
>> Cc: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>
>> Cc: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/watchdog/aspeed_wdt.c | 7 +++++++
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/aspeed_wdt.c 
>> b/drivers/watchdog/aspeed_wdt.c
>> index b4773a6aaf8c..520d8aba12a5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/aspeed_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/aspeed_wdt.c
>> @@ -187,6 +187,13 @@ static int aspeed_wdt_set_pretimeout(struct 
>> watchdog_device *wdd,
>>       u32 actual = pretimeout * WDT_RATE_1MHZ;
>>       u32 s = wdt->cfg->irq_shift;
>>       u32 m = wdt->cfg->irq_mask;
>> +    u32 reload = readl(wdt->base + WDT_RELOAD_VALUE);
>> +
>
> It is unusual to use a register value here and not the configured timeout
> value. I would have assumed that pretimeout is compared against 
> wdt->timout,
> not against the register value, and that the multiplication with 
> WDT_RATE_1MHZ
> is done after validation. This needs an explanation.
It was supposed to be a straight-forward way to check if the pretimeout 
value is supported by the hardware. I can change to wdt->timeout if it 
is better.

Further, in the case of wdt->timeout > max_hw_heartbeat_ms, shall we 
restrict the pretimeout to be larger than wdt->timeout - 
max_hw_heartbeat_ms  / 2? For the watchdog_kworker works in 
max_hw_heartbeat_ms  / 2 interval, pretimeout event may be triggered 
unexpected when watchdog is not pinged in (max_hw_heartbeat_ms - 
(timeout - pretimeout)).

>
>> +    if (actual >= reload)
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>> +
>
> On top of that, you'll also need to explain why 
> watchdog_pretimeout_invalid()
> and with it the validation in watchdog_set_pretimeout() does not work 
> for this
> watchdog and why this extra validation is necessary.

watchdog_pretimeout_invalid() will return false if wdt->timeout == 0, 
but we can't determine the hardware pretimeout value if timeout == 0 here.

Thanks,

Heyi

>
> Guenter
>
>> +    /* watchdog timer is counting down */
>> +    actual = reload - actual;
>>         wdd->pretimeout = pretimeout;
>>       wdt->ctrl &= ~m;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-19  3:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-18  3:16 [PATCH 1/2] driver/aspeed-wdt: fix pretimeout for counting down logic Heyi Guo
2025-02-18  3:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: aspeed: aspeed-g6.dtsi: enable IRQ for watchdogs Heyi Guo
2025-02-18  7:53   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-19  1:12   ` Andrew Jeffery
2025-02-18  5:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] driver/aspeed-wdt: fix pretimeout for counting down logic Guenter Roeck
2025-02-19  1:25   ` Andrew Jeffery
2025-02-19  1:40     ` Guenter Roeck
2025-02-19  3:41   ` Heyi Guo [this message]
2025-02-19  6:07     ` Guenter Roeck
2025-02-19  6:48       ` Heyi Guo
     [not found]   ` <7e2c5f2c-d07a-472c-aae5-6b639a144d88@linux.alibaba.com>
2025-02-19  3:51     ` Heyi Guo
2025-02-19  0:42 ` Rob Herring (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5a33f86d-d82c-4685-8da7-5e623487a40c@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=guoheyi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=andrew@codeconstruct.com.au \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eajames@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox