From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Linus Walleij" <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: bcm7038: Add a restart callback
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 22:48:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-172006@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015-genexis-xg6846-watchdog-reset-v1-1-9577d65223d5@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] watchdog: bcm7038_wdt: missing spinlock causes restart failure on panic
--
commit 6002003a9fe5a5243c56c551564e6ccb85d21046
Author: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
watchdog: bcm7038: Add a restart callback
The watchdog in BCM6846 can reset the system, but bcm7038_wdt
does not provide a restart callback. Add this. The vendor kernel
also uses a short watchdog timeout to reset this SoC.
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
> index e038dd66b8198..1637e32ac02e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -113,6 +115,32 @@ static unsigned int bcm7038_wdt_get_timeleft(struct watchdog_device *wdog)
> return time_left / wdt->rate;
> }
>
> +static int bcm7038_wdt_restart(struct watchdog_device *wdog,
> + unsigned long action, void *data)
> +{
> + struct bcm7038_watchdog *wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdog);
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + /*
> + * Prevent runtime watchdog operations from interfering on
> + * uniprocessor systems where restart handlers are preemptible.
> + */
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> +
> + /* Stop the timer before changing its reload value. */
> + bcm7038_wdt_stop(wdog);
[Severity: High]
Can this restart handler execute out of sequence with other watchdog
operations?
If a panic or SysRq interrupt preempts a ping or stop operation exactly
between its two writes to WDT_CMD_REG, could the hardware state machine
become corrupted?
For example, if bcm7038_wdt_ping() is interrupted:
drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c:bcm7038_wdt_ping() {
...
bcm7038_wdt_write(WDT_START_1, wdt->base + WDT_CMD_REG);
<--- interrupted by panic/SysRq
And then bcm7038_wdt_restart() executes in the interrupt context, it will
call bcm7038_wdt_stop() which writes WDT_STOP_1 to the hardware that was
expecting WDT_START_2.
Would this cause the watchdog to ignore the reset command and hang the
system during reboot or panic? Additionally, on SMP, could an
smp_send_stop() IPI from a panicking CPU halt another CPU mid-sequence in
the same way?
> + /* The watchdog does not fire with a count below two. */
> + bcm7038_wdt_write(2, wdt->base + WDT_TIMEOUT_REG);
> + bcm7038_wdt_ping(wdog);
> +
> + /* Flush the writes and wait for the reset to take effect. */
> + bcm7038_wdt_read(wdt->base + WDT_CMD_REG);
> + mdelay(500);
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261015-genexis-xg6846-watchdog-reset-v1-1-9577d65223d5@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 22:39 [PATCH] watchdog: bcm7038: Add a restart callback Linus Walleij
2026-10-14 22:48 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-14 22:52 ` Florian Fainelli
2026-10-15 19:30 ` Justin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-172006@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox