From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: hostapd: passing sta info struct to drivers?
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:59:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1190977157.5021.28.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070928011630.GI27241@jm.kir.nu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1501 bytes --]
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 18:16 -0700, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> > During porting the STA management to nl80211 it turned out that it would
> > be much nicer in the kernel if we would always set all the flags on a
> > STA that the kernel needs to get from hostapd.
>
> That I might be able to support at least partially by merging together
> some operations, but still, I would expect there to be valid scenarios
> where it would be useful to be able to just toggle a single flag.
Are there really? I can only see three flags in the kernel being set by
hostapd, those being "authorized", "wme capable" and "shortslot
capable". Some additional flags for the userspace MLME maybe, I need to
look into that later.
Hence, I don't see any place where we'd ever need to set a single flag,
we need to keep track of all those flags anyway.
It is certainly possible to have selective flags updating but I don't
quite see the point.
> This is not going to happen. struct sta_info (the one in hostapd) is
> internal for the core implementation and the driver wrappers should
> never touch it directly, i.e., pointer to this is not passed on purpose.
> If changes to the operation between the driver wrapper and kernel is
> desired, it will need to be done in a different way.
Ok. I'm still thinking about the best way to do VLAN/STA finding but I
may just do that by the AP interface VLANs are tied to. Then the only
thing I really need changed is the above flags change.
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-28 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-27 16:46 hostapd: passing sta info struct to drivers? Johannes Berg
2007-09-27 17:56 ` Johannes Berg
2007-09-28 1:16 ` Jouni Malinen
2007-09-28 10:59 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2007-09-28 16:06 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1190977157.5021.28.camel@johannes.berg \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox