From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: remove "bcn_int" and "capab" scan results info
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:46:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1195814788.4149.92.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1195736257.6323.89.camel@johannes.berg> (sfid-20071122_125756_937663_F323979F)
> > If I understood correctly, the proposed change was removing 'capab'
> > information from scan results(?). If that is the case, that would break
> > wpa_supplicant network selection since there would be no information on
> > whether the network is using encryption or not (privacy flag) and
> > whether it is a BSS or an IBSS. Consequently, I obviously continue to
> > object this type of change as long as WE is used for getting scan
> > results.
>
> Well, wpa_supplicant currently works, right? And this code is never
> triggered before the change to remove scan_flags because scan_flags
> cannot be set. Hence, I don't see how wpa_supplicant can possibly need
> this information.
In fact, wpa_supplicant isn't even using the capab= information from the
possibly present custom structure in the scan result, it uses
SIOCGIWMODE to figure out whether it's a BSS or an IBSS, and probably
IWEVGENIE to figure out encryption.
The only thing it can possibly read from the custom scan result is
wpa_ie= and rsn_ie= which are IWEVGENIE and tsf= which we never pass.
Therefore, we should merge this patch.
johannes
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-23 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-21 16:55 [PATCH] mac80211: remove "bcn_int" and "capab" scan results info John W. Linville
2007-11-21 17:01 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-22 4:31 ` Jouni Malinen
2007-11-22 12:57 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-23 10:46 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1195814788.4149.92.camel@johannes.berg \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox