Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
Cc: Helmut Schaa <hschaa@suse.de>,
	John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5] mac80211: fix NULL pointer dereference in ieee80211_compatible_rates
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 13:38:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1211290714.6252.93.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240805200633y6730a1e3ufbc0adfedd3f8243@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080520_153405_359637_5B9C0929)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1066 bytes --]


> > Thing is, I'm not totally convinced it is wrong to the code while it may
> > or may not be wrong...
> 
> Doesn't should be bss pinned int he bss list if you are associating to
> it. If it's not there you don't have access to it's info It looks very
> wrong to me.

Well, yes, it is a bit odd.

> > I think this patch should go in first as it
> > actually fixes the oops, and then we can discuss the merits of adding a
> > warning there separately. Maybe after we look a bit at the code and try
> > to figure out whether it can still happen after that patch from
> > Abhijeet.
> 
> I'm not sure if this patch is complete without this warning. What is
> in the else statement is a hack and it should be obvious.

Considering that the message won't help us at all, why bother? We know
it's triggering, we know this might be a problem, and we know we can
only solve it by auditing the code. So why add a message that will get
us countless emails/complaints from people we cannot do anything about
anyway without doing the audit?

johannes

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-20 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-20  7:56 [PATCHv5] mac80211: fix NULL pointer dereference in ieee80211_compatible_rates Helmut Schaa
2008-05-20 12:54 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-20 12:57   ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-20 13:11     ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-20 13:22       ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-20 13:33         ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-20 13:38           ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2008-05-20 13:44             ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-20 13:47             ` Larry Finger
2008-05-20 14:20               ` John W. Linville
2008-05-20 14:41               ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-21 10:47   ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-21 13:54     ` John W. Linville
2008-05-21 14:50       ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-21 15:08         ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-21 15:11           ` Tomas Winkler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1211290714.6252.93.camel@johannes.berg \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=hschaa@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=tomasw@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox