From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
Cc: Helmut Schaa <hschaa@suse.de>,
John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5] mac80211: fix NULL pointer dereference in ieee80211_compatible_rates
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 13:38:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1211290714.6252.93.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240805200633y6730a1e3ufbc0adfedd3f8243@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080520_153405_359637_5B9C0929)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1066 bytes --]
> > Thing is, I'm not totally convinced it is wrong to the code while it may
> > or may not be wrong...
>
> Doesn't should be bss pinned int he bss list if you are associating to
> it. If it's not there you don't have access to it's info It looks very
> wrong to me.
Well, yes, it is a bit odd.
> > I think this patch should go in first as it
> > actually fixes the oops, and then we can discuss the merits of adding a
> > warning there separately. Maybe after we look a bit at the code and try
> > to figure out whether it can still happen after that patch from
> > Abhijeet.
>
> I'm not sure if this patch is complete without this warning. What is
> in the else statement is a hack and it should be obvious.
Considering that the message won't help us at all, why bother? We know
it's triggering, we know this might be a problem, and we know we can
only solve it by auditing the code. So why add a message that will get
us countless emails/complaints from people we cannot do anything about
anyway without doing the audit?
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-20 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-20 7:56 [PATCHv5] mac80211: fix NULL pointer dereference in ieee80211_compatible_rates Helmut Schaa
2008-05-20 12:54 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-20 12:57 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-20 13:11 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-20 13:22 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-20 13:33 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-20 13:38 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2008-05-20 13:44 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-20 13:47 ` Larry Finger
2008-05-20 14:20 ` John W. Linville
2008-05-20 14:41 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-21 10:47 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-21 13:54 ` John W. Linville
2008-05-21 14:50 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-21 15:08 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-21 15:11 ` Tomas Winkler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1211290714.6252.93.camel@johannes.berg \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=hschaa@suse.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=tomasw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox