From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>, Helmut Schaa <hschaa@suse.de>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5] mac80211: fix NULL pointer dereference in ieee80211_compatible_rates
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 10:20:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080520142012.GA1106@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4832D661.60902@lwfinger.net>
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 08:47:13AM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> Johannes Berg wrote:
>>>> Thing is, I'm not totally convinced it is wrong to the code while it may
>>>> or may not be wrong...
>>> Doesn't should be bss pinned int he bss list if you are associating to
>>> it. If it's not there you don't have access to it's info It looks very
>>> wrong to me.
>>
>> Well, yes, it is a bit odd.
>>
>>>> I think this patch should go in first as it
>>>> actually fixes the oops, and then we can discuss the merits of adding a
>>>> warning there separately. Maybe after we look a bit at the code and try
>>>> to figure out whether it can still happen after that patch from
>>>> Abhijeet.
>>> I'm not sure if this patch is complete without this warning. What is
>>> in the else statement is a hack and it should be obvious.
>>
>> Considering that the message won't help us at all, why bother? We know
>> it's triggering, we know this might be a problem, and we know we can
>> only solve it by auditing the code. So why add a message that will get
>> us countless emails/complaints from people we cannot do anything about
>> anyway without doing the audit?
>
> This argument could go on endlessly; however, it is clear that we need to
> settle on a patch and get it upstream ASAP! Now that mainline is broken,
> the urgency is _MUCH_ greater.
I agree. I'll take this one unless someone finds a problem with it.
John
--
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-20 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-20 7:56 [PATCHv5] mac80211: fix NULL pointer dereference in ieee80211_compatible_rates Helmut Schaa
2008-05-20 12:54 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-20 12:57 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-20 13:11 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-20 13:22 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-20 13:33 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-20 13:38 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-20 13:44 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-20 13:47 ` Larry Finger
2008-05-20 14:20 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2008-05-20 14:41 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-21 10:47 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-21 13:54 ` John W. Linville
2008-05-21 14:50 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-21 15:08 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-21 15:11 ` Tomas Winkler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080520142012.GA1106@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hschaa@suse.de \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomasw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox