From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, yi.zhu@intel.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Ester Kummer <ester.kummer@intel.com>,
Luis Carlos Cobo <luisca@cozybit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mac80211: scan on IBSS mode like on STA mode
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:37:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1221082630.3804.43.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240809101432u23bf198bqcf9bd0e9f91a2ae8@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080910_233253_312411_FCC1C92C)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 954 bytes --]
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 00:32 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> Okay so here is the scenario. Iwlwifi reject scan that is triggered
> withing fixed period after
> association to leave time to finish EAPOL exchange.
Why is iwlwifi thinking it's associating in an IBSS?
> We never hit the problem in STA mode because of this code
>
> if (sdata->vif.type != IEEE80211_IF_TYPE_STA)
> return ieee80211_sta_start_scan(dev, ssid, ssid_len);
>
> which makes it go through the work queue, just pure timing luck.
Well the remainder of the code makes it go through, but yeah.
> I will remove this delay for IBSS, there is no association and no 1X
> is going on.
Ok, makes sense.
> For BSS I suggest to enforce similar delay already mac80211, iwlwifi I
> just return empty scan completion and buffered results will be
> returned.
We might want to enforce a similar delay like that in mac80211 instead
of iwlwifi, yeah.
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-10 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-08 13:31 [PATCH 1/1] mac80211: scan on IBSS mode like on STA mode Tomas Winkler
2008-09-08 14:55 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-08 15:05 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-08 15:16 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-08 16:53 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-08 18:13 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-08 22:24 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-10 21:32 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-10 21:37 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2008-09-08 16:42 ` Tomas Winkler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1221082630.3804.43.camel@johannes.berg \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=ester.kummer@intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=luisca@cozybit.com \
--cc=tomasw@gmail.com \
--cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox