Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Henning Rogge <hrogge@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mac80211: Add HT rates into RX status reporting
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:24:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1229023482.8081.67.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081211192251.GA5170@jm.kir.nu>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1276 bytes --]

On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 21:22 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 07:22:48PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 20:15 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> > > Yes. FreeBSD radiotap definition uses 0x80 as a flag in the rate field
> > > for indicating that it is an MCS index, not bitrate.
> 
> > Ugh. Nobody will dissect that properly.
> 
> Actually, wireshark seems to have code to dissect that..

Ok, I stand corrected. Oh well, this is a huge mess...

> Well, yes, I do need it like yesterday. I really want to have a reliable
> sniffer that I can trust on providing correct information about received
> frames. I can obviously handle a personal patch that adds this, but it
> gets more complex when asking others to capture some frames for you..

Right. We'll need A-MPDU stuff too, I guess?

> Anyway, I will move the radiotap parts into a separate patch and leave
> it to others to decide whether that should go in now or not. The best
> option (if John is willing) would likely be to get the first part
> (mac80211 driver API addition and ath9k fix/cleanup) in and pushed
> upstream while the radiotap parts would be maintained only in
> wireless-testing for the time being.

I agree, that seems best.

johannes

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2008-12-11 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-11 16:17 [RFC] mac80211: Add HT rates into RX status reporting Jouni Malinen
2008-12-11 17:16 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-11 18:15   ` Jouni Malinen
2008-12-11 18:22     ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-11 19:22       ` Jouni Malinen
2008-12-11 19:24         ` Johannes Berg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1229023482.8081.67.camel@johannes.berg \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=hrogge@googlemail.com \
    --cc=j@w1.fi \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox