From: reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: WARN on return of ieee80211_if_config
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:58:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1240261096.5206.107.camel@rc-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240252511.4632.17.camel@johannes.local>
Hi Johannes,
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 11:35 -0700, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi Reinette,
>
> > In 2.6.30 we are starting to see people encountering a WARN when
> > resuming with HW rfkill enabled. The WARN is printed from
> > net/mac80211/pm.c:159 in 2.6.30, for current wireless-testing it is
> > net/mac80211/util.c:1050.
>
> Hmm, ok, that makes sense.
>
> > With that function resuming multiple interfaces I do not know if it will
> > make sense to return an error code if one fails. So, it seems that
> > __ieee80211_resume()/ieee80211_reconfig() will always return zero. Even
> > so, the case where ieee80211_if_config() fails needs to be
> > accommodated.
> >
> > Would something like this make sense?
> >
> > diff --git a/net/mac80211/pm.c b/net/mac80211/pm.c
> > index 0273023..46f2961 100644
> > --- a/net/mac80211/pm.c
> > +++ b/net/mac80211/pm.c
> > @@ -156,8 +156,11 @@ int __ieee80211_resume(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
> > case NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC:
> > case NL80211_IFTYPE_AP:
> > case NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT:
> > - WARN_ON(ieee80211_if_config(sdata, changed));
> > - ieee80211_bss_info_change_notify(sdata, ~0);
> > + if (ieee80211_if_config(sdata, changed))
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: failed to configure interface\n",
> > + sdata->dev->name);
> > + else
> > + ieee80211_bss_info_change_notify(sdata, ~0);
>
> Not sure. That doesn't seem to make sense anyway, since iwlwifi does
> this:
>
> if (iwl_is_rfkill(priv))
> goto done;
> ...
> done:
> ...
> return 0;
>
>
> Or will this test:
> if (!iwl_is_alive(priv))
> return -EAGAIN;
>
> kick us out before even getting to the rfkill test?
Yes ... and it is not immediately clear that it is caused by rfkill. The
STATUS_ALIVE bit that is tested here is cleared when machine is
suspended. When machine is resumed and HW rfkill is set then it will not
come up fully, see __iwl_up() that returns early with success if rfkill
is enabled. STATUS_ALIVE will only be set again after HW rfkill is
disabled and we initialize ucode again.
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-20 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-20 18:31 WARN on return of ieee80211_if_config reinette chatre
2009-04-20 18:35 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-20 20:58 ` reinette chatre [this message]
2009-04-20 21:06 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1240261096.5206.107.camel@rc-desk \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox