From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Subject: Re: driver_nl80211 broken again
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:54:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1252443260.16422.5.camel@maxim-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1252423769.3806.4.camel@johannes.local>
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 17:29 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 05:08 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>
> > 1 - when connecting again to the access point (same or another),
> > wpa_supplicant does the following:
> >
> > deassoc
> > auth
> > assoc
> >
> > So it assumes that deassoc command disconnects completely, but it not
> > longer true.
> > Yet, I have tried to make its dissassoc function do both, but it failed.
> > I used following patch:
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.c b/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.c
> > index c68dd82..50afeeb 100644
> > --- a/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.c
> > +++ b/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.c
> > @@ -1278,8 +1278,10 @@ void wpa_supplicant_disassociate(struct wpa_supplicant *wpa_s,
> > if (!is_zero_ether_addr(wpa_s->bssid)) {
> > if (wpa_s->drv_flags & WPA_DRIVER_FLAGS_USER_SPACE_MLME)
> > ieee80211_sta_disassociate(wpa_s, reason_code);
> > - else
> > + else {
> > wpa_drv_disassociate(wpa_s, wpa_s->bssid, reason_code);
> > + wpa_drv_deauthenticate(wpa_s, wpa_s->bssid, reason_code);
> > + }
> > addr = wpa_s->bssid;
> > }
> > wpa_clear_keys(wpa_s, addr);
>
> Right, this is a known problem. I still think it should be handled in
> wpa_s, but I'm not sure whether that patch should have worked or not.
>
> > EAPOL: startWhen --> 0
> > EAPOL: disable timer tick
> > wpa_driver_nl80211_disassociate
> > wpa_driver_nl80211_deauthenticate
> > nl80211: MLME command failed: ret=-67 (Link has been severed)
>
> Ok so it was called, but got -ENOLINK? That's rather odd. But I suspect
> that it had already internally cleared the BSSID, so that it was asking
> to deauth from 00:...:00 -- could you check that?
I figure that out, but the wpa_drv_disassociate and
wpa_drv_deauthenticate are direct wrappers over nl80211 calls.
>
> > 2 - independent of the above, the ieee80211_set_disassoc
> > doesn't work right if deauth==false.
> >
> >
> > If it is, then a work item is added to station work thread, and it is
> > never removed:
> >
> > } else {
> > struct ieee80211_mgd_work *wk = ifmgd->old_associate_work;
> >
> > wk->state = IEEE80211_MGD_STATE_IDLE;
> > list_add(&wk->list, &ifmgd->work_list);
> > }
> >
> >
> > iee80211_sta_work just ignores the IEEE80211_MGD_STATE_IDLE, thus it
> > work item remains forever.
> >
> > This breaks scanning, since __ieee80211_start_scan will refuses to run
> > until, ifmgd->work_list is empty.
>
> That's intentional, that work item represents the authentication state
> we still have -- the required cleanup should be done by cfg80211 or
> wpa_supplicant.
But isn't it too much?
This means, the wpa_supplicant can lock the device.
>
> Can you try to figure out what the parameters are that
> wpa_drv_deauthenticate() is sending to the kernel, and why it's getting
> -ENOLINK?
Sure!
Very soon will do
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-08 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-24 12:32 driver_nl80211 broken again Maxim Levitsky
2009-08-24 14:08 ` Johannes Berg
2009-08-24 20:06 ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-08-24 20:58 ` Johannes Berg
2009-09-05 2:08 ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-09-05 13:07 ` Johannes Berg
2009-09-08 15:29 ` Johannes Berg
2009-09-08 20:54 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2009-09-30 1:19 ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-09-30 22:13 ` Jouni Malinen
2009-10-01 8:46 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-02 21:31 ` Trepak Vilmos
2009-10-03 5:52 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1252443260.16422.5.camel@maxim-laptop \
--to=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox