public inbox for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: linville@tuxdriver.com
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/13 v2.6.32 and w-t] iwlwifi: fix potential rx buffer loss
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:38:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1252690699-25796-7-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1252690699-25796-1-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com>

From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>

RX handling maintains a few lists that keep track of the RX buffers.
Buffers move from one list to the other as they are used, replenished, and
again made available for usage. In one such instance, when a buffer is used
it enters the "rx_used" list. When buffers are replenished an skb is
attached to the buffer and it is moved to the "rx_free" list. The problem
here is that the buffer is first removed from the "rx_used" list _before_ the
skb is allocated. Thus, if the skb allocation fails this buffer remains
removed from the "rx_used" list and is thus lost for future usage.

Fix this by first allocating the skb before trying to attach it to a list.
We add an additional check to not do this unnecessarily.

Reported-by: Rick Farrington <rickdic@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c       |   24 +++++++++++++++++-------
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c
index 8150c5c..b90adcb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c
@@ -239,26 +239,22 @@ void iwl_rx_allocate(struct iwl_priv *priv, gfp_t priority)
 	struct iwl_rx_queue *rxq = &priv->rxq;
 	struct list_head *element;
 	struct iwl_rx_mem_buffer *rxb;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	while (1) {
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&rxq->lock, flags);
-
 		if (list_empty(&rxq->rx_used)) {
 			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rxq->lock, flags);
 			return;
 		}
-		element = rxq->rx_used.next;
-		rxb = list_entry(element, struct iwl_rx_mem_buffer, list);
-		list_del(element);
-
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rxq->lock, flags);
 
 		/* Alloc a new receive buffer */
-		rxb->skb = alloc_skb(priv->hw_params.rx_buf_size + 256,
+		skb = alloc_skb(priv->hw_params.rx_buf_size + 256,
 						priority);
 
-		if (!rxb->skb) {
+		if (!skb) {
 			IWL_CRIT(priv, "Can not allocate SKB buffers\n");
 			/* We don't reschedule replenish work here -- we will
 			 * call the restock method and if it still needs
@@ -266,6 +262,20 @@ void iwl_rx_allocate(struct iwl_priv *priv, gfp_t priority)
 			break;
 		}
 
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&rxq->lock, flags);
+
+		if (list_empty(&rxq->rx_used)) {
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rxq->lock, flags);
+			dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+			return;
+		}
+		element = rxq->rx_used.next;
+		rxb = list_entry(element, struct iwl_rx_mem_buffer, list);
+		list_del(element);
+
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rxq->lock, flags);
+
+		rxb->skb = skb;
 		/* Get physical address of RB/SKB */
 		rxb->real_dma_addr = pci_map_single(
 					priv->pci_dev,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
index 2238c9f..0909668 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
@@ -1134,6 +1134,7 @@ static void iwl3945_rx_allocate(struct iwl_priv *priv, gfp_t priority)
 	struct iwl_rx_queue *rxq = &priv->rxq;
 	struct list_head *element;
 	struct iwl_rx_mem_buffer *rxb;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	while (1) {
@@ -1143,17 +1144,11 @@ static void iwl3945_rx_allocate(struct iwl_priv *priv, gfp_t priority)
 			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rxq->lock, flags);
 			return;
 		}
-
-		element = rxq->rx_used.next;
-		rxb = list_entry(element, struct iwl_rx_mem_buffer, list);
-		list_del(element);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rxq->lock, flags);
 
 		/* Alloc a new receive buffer */
-		rxb->skb =
-		    alloc_skb(priv->hw_params.rx_buf_size,
-				priority);
-		if (!rxb->skb) {
+		skb = alloc_skb(priv->hw_params.rx_buf_size, priority);
+		if (!skb) {
 			if (net_ratelimit())
 				IWL_CRIT(priv, ": Can not allocate SKB buffers\n");
 			/* We don't reschedule replenish work here -- we will
@@ -1162,6 +1157,19 @@ static void iwl3945_rx_allocate(struct iwl_priv *priv, gfp_t priority)
 			break;
 		}
 
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&rxq->lock, flags);
+		if (list_empty(&rxq->rx_used)) {
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rxq->lock, flags);
+			dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+			return;
+		}
+		element = rxq->rx_used.next;
+		rxb = list_entry(element, struct iwl_rx_mem_buffer, list);
+		list_del(element);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rxq->lock, flags);
+
+		rxb->skb = skb;
+
 		/* If radiotap head is required, reserve some headroom here.
 		 * The physical head count is a variable rx_stats->phy_count.
 		 * We reserve 4 bytes here. Plus these extra bytes, the
-- 
1.5.6.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-11 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-11 17:38 [PATCH 0/13] iwlwifi driver updates 09/11/2009 Reinette Chatre
2009-09-11 17:38 ` [PATCH 01/13] iwlwifi: modify LED blink index table Reinette Chatre
2009-09-11 17:38 ` [PATCH 02/13 v2.6.32 and w-t] iwlwifi: fix HT operation in 2.4 GHz band Reinette Chatre
2009-09-11 17:38 ` [PATCH 03/13] iwlwifi: remove un-supported eeprom parameters Reinette Chatre
2009-09-11 17:38 ` [PATCH 04/13] iwlwifi: separate nic_config for different NIC Reinette Chatre
2009-09-11 17:38 ` [PATCH 05/13] iwlwifi: separate set_hw_params function for 6000 series Reinette Chatre
2009-09-11 17:38 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2009-09-11 17:38 ` [PATCH 07/13] iwlwifi: clean up ht config a little Reinette Chatre
2009-09-11 17:46   ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-09-11 21:12     ` reinette chatre
2009-09-12 13:12     ` Johannes Berg
2009-09-11 17:38 ` [PATCH 08/13] iwlwifi: Adjust blink rate to compensate Clock difference Reinette Chatre
2009-09-11 17:38 ` [PATCH 09/13] iwlwifi: clean up ht config naming Reinette Chatre
2009-09-13 23:45   ` [ipw3945-devel] " Tomas Winkler
2009-09-13 23:52     ` Johannes Berg
2009-09-11 17:38 ` [PATCH 10/13] iwlwifi: show NVM version in debugfs Reinette Chatre
2009-09-11 17:38 ` [PATCH 11/13] iwlwifi: clarify and clean up chain settings Reinette Chatre
2009-09-11 17:38 ` [PATCH 12/13 v2.6.32 and w-t] iwlwifi: find the correct first antenna Reinette Chatre
2009-09-11 17:38 ` [PATCH 13/13 v2.6.32 and w-t] iwlwifi: disable powersave for 4965 Reinette Chatre
2009-09-11 17:48   ` reinette chatre
2009-09-11 17:50   ` [PATCH 13/13 v2.6.32] " reinette chatre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1252690699-25796-7-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox