From: reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Andrew Lutomirski <andy@luto.us>
Cc: "ilw@linux.intel.com" <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlcore: Allow runtime configuration of no_sleep_autoadjust
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:19:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1257787187.21134.22331.camel@rc-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb0375e10911081130k5d8f8347y999cf66a98e6898a@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 11:30 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> Runtime adjustment of no_sleep_autoadjust seems fine, both looking at
> the code and in practice. This makes it easier to test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
> ---
> I've been running this patch (and twiddling the setting) for a couple
> months now, and it seems to work fine. I think it's a bit late for
> 2.6.32, even though it's pretty much impossible for this to cause any
> regressions, but it would be nice to see it go in for 2.6.33 until
> no_sleep_autoadjust goes away.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-power.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-power.c
> index 60be976..4eba1ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-power.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-power.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
> * adjusting ...
> */
> bool no_sleep_autoadjust = true;
> -module_param(no_sleep_autoadjust, bool, S_IRUGO);
> +module_param(no_sleep_autoadjust, bool, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_sleep_autoadjust,
> "don't automatically adjust sleep level "
> "according to maximum network latency");
I think this change is a bit deceiving since making this writable does
not result in what you write to it at runtime being communicated to the
device.
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-09 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-08 19:30 [PATCH] iwlcore: Allow runtime configuration of no_sleep_autoadjust Andrew Lutomirski
2009-11-09 17:19 ` reinette chatre [this message]
2009-11-09 18:07 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2009-11-09 22:21 ` reinette chatre
2009-11-09 22:47 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2009-11-09 23:01 ` reinette chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1257787187.21134.22331.camel@rc-desk \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=andy@luto.us \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox