Re: [PATCH] mwl8k: split driver by chipset

[Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 968 bytes --]

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 12:29 +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:

> This has the problem that e.g. if someone creates a STA interface first,
> and we load the STA firmware image in response to that, and then creates
> an additional AP interface, we'd have reload the chip while there's
> still an active interface (the original STA one), which seems somewhat
> involved.  Just rejecting the second add_interface() seems undesirable,
> as then the outcome of two add_interface() calls will depend on their
> order.
> 
> (AP firmware supports both AP and STA interfaces, but e.g. it doesn't
> do STA power save and such.)
> 
> It'll also have some consequences if there are monitor interfaces, as
> e.g. STA firmware allows fine-grained control over the receive filter,
> while the AP firmware does not.

Hah well in that case it won't really work because you really shouldn't
change capabilities on the fly. I have no useful idea then, sorry.

johannes

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]