From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: linville@tuxdriver.com
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 16/17] iwlwifi: move ucode related function to iwl-agn-ucode.c
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 14:49:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273787399-9280-17-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273787399-9280-1-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com>
From: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Cleanup the code and move all the uCode related functions specific to _agn
devices to iwl-agn-ucode.c
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-ucode.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.h | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c | 124 --------------------------
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h | 1 -
4 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-ucode.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-ucode.c
index 637286c..6f77441 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-ucode.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-ucode.c
@@ -423,3 +423,126 @@ int iwlagn_alive_notify(struct iwl_priv *priv)
return 0;
}
+
+
+/**
+ * iwl_verify_inst_sparse - verify runtime uCode image in card vs. host,
+ * using sample data 100 bytes apart. If these sample points are good,
+ * it's a pretty good bet that everything between them is good, too.
+ */
+static int iwlcore_verify_inst_sparse(struct iwl_priv *priv, __le32 *image, u32 len)
+{
+ u32 val;
+ int ret = 0;
+ u32 errcnt = 0;
+ u32 i;
+
+ IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "ucode inst image size is %u\n", len);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i += 100, image += 100/sizeof(u32)) {
+ /* read data comes through single port, auto-incr addr */
+ /* NOTE: Use the debugless read so we don't flood kernel log
+ * if IWL_DL_IO is set */
+ iwl_write_direct32(priv, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RADDR,
+ i + IWLAGN_RTC_INST_LOWER_BOUND);
+ val = _iwl_read_direct32(priv, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RDAT);
+ if (val != le32_to_cpu(*image)) {
+ ret = -EIO;
+ errcnt++;
+ if (errcnt >= 3)
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * iwlcore_verify_inst_full - verify runtime uCode image in card vs. host,
+ * looking at all data.
+ */
+static int iwl_verify_inst_full(struct iwl_priv *priv, __le32 *image,
+ u32 len)
+{
+ u32 val;
+ u32 save_len = len;
+ int ret = 0;
+ u32 errcnt;
+
+ IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "ucode inst image size is %u\n", len);
+
+ iwl_write_direct32(priv, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RADDR,
+ IWLAGN_RTC_INST_LOWER_BOUND);
+
+ errcnt = 0;
+ for (; len > 0; len -= sizeof(u32), image++) {
+ /* read data comes through single port, auto-incr addr */
+ /* NOTE: Use the debugless read so we don't flood kernel log
+ * if IWL_DL_IO is set */
+ val = _iwl_read_direct32(priv, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RDAT);
+ if (val != le32_to_cpu(*image)) {
+ IWL_ERR(priv, "uCode INST section is invalid at "
+ "offset 0x%x, is 0x%x, s/b 0x%x\n",
+ save_len - len, val, le32_to_cpu(*image));
+ ret = -EIO;
+ errcnt++;
+ if (errcnt >= 20)
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!errcnt)
+ IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv,
+ "ucode image in INSTRUCTION memory is good\n");
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * iwl_verify_ucode - determine which instruction image is in SRAM,
+ * and verify its contents
+ */
+int iwl_verify_ucode(struct iwl_priv *priv)
+{
+ __le32 *image;
+ u32 len;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Try bootstrap */
+ image = (__le32 *)priv->ucode_boot.v_addr;
+ len = priv->ucode_boot.len;
+ ret = iwlcore_verify_inst_sparse(priv, image, len);
+ if (!ret) {
+ IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "Bootstrap uCode is good in inst SRAM\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* Try initialize */
+ image = (__le32 *)priv->ucode_init.v_addr;
+ len = priv->ucode_init.len;
+ ret = iwlcore_verify_inst_sparse(priv, image, len);
+ if (!ret) {
+ IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "Initialize uCode is good in inst SRAM\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* Try runtime/protocol */
+ image = (__le32 *)priv->ucode_code.v_addr;
+ len = priv->ucode_code.len;
+ ret = iwlcore_verify_inst_sparse(priv, image, len);
+ if (!ret) {
+ IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "Runtime uCode is good in inst SRAM\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ IWL_ERR(priv, "NO VALID UCODE IMAGE IN INSTRUCTION SRAM!!\n");
+
+ /* Since nothing seems to match, show first several data entries in
+ * instruction SRAM, so maybe visual inspection will give a clue.
+ * Selection of bootstrap image (vs. other images) is arbitrary. */
+ image = (__le32 *)priv->ucode_boot.v_addr;
+ len = priv->ucode_boot.len;
+ ret = iwl_verify_inst_full(priv, image, len);
+
+ return ret;
+}
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.h b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.h
index 2ebbe81..f7ef893 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.h
@@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ void iwlagn_rx_calib_complete(struct iwl_priv *priv,
struct iwl_rx_mem_buffer *rxb);
void iwlagn_init_alive_start(struct iwl_priv *priv);
int iwlagn_alive_notify(struct iwl_priv *priv);
+int iwl_verify_ucode(struct iwl_priv *priv);
/* lib */
void iwl_check_abort_status(struct iwl_priv *priv,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c
index 10ce008..4a50c04 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c
@@ -1460,130 +1460,6 @@ int iwl_send_statistics_request(struct iwl_priv *priv, u8 flags, bool clear)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(iwl_send_statistics_request);
-/**
- * iwl_verify_inst_sparse - verify runtime uCode image in card vs. host,
- * using sample data 100 bytes apart. If these sample points are good,
- * it's a pretty good bet that everything between them is good, too.
- */
-static int iwlcore_verify_inst_sparse(struct iwl_priv *priv, __le32 *image, u32 len)
-{
- u32 val;
- int ret = 0;
- u32 errcnt = 0;
- u32 i;
-
- IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "ucode inst image size is %u\n", len);
-
- for (i = 0; i < len; i += 100, image += 100/sizeof(u32)) {
- /* read data comes through single port, auto-incr addr */
- /* NOTE: Use the debugless read so we don't flood kernel log
- * if IWL_DL_IO is set */
- iwl_write_direct32(priv, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RADDR,
- i + IWL49_RTC_INST_LOWER_BOUND);
- val = _iwl_read_direct32(priv, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RDAT);
- if (val != le32_to_cpu(*image)) {
- ret = -EIO;
- errcnt++;
- if (errcnt >= 3)
- break;
- }
- }
-
- return ret;
-}
-
-/**
- * iwlcore_verify_inst_full - verify runtime uCode image in card vs. host,
- * looking at all data.
- */
-static int iwl_verify_inst_full(struct iwl_priv *priv, __le32 *image,
- u32 len)
-{
- u32 val;
- u32 save_len = len;
- int ret = 0;
- u32 errcnt;
-
- IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "ucode inst image size is %u\n", len);
-
- iwl_write_direct32(priv, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RADDR,
- IWL49_RTC_INST_LOWER_BOUND);
-
- errcnt = 0;
- for (; len > 0; len -= sizeof(u32), image++) {
- /* read data comes through single port, auto-incr addr */
- /* NOTE: Use the debugless read so we don't flood kernel log
- * if IWL_DL_IO is set */
- val = _iwl_read_direct32(priv, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RDAT);
- if (val != le32_to_cpu(*image)) {
- IWL_ERR(priv, "uCode INST section is invalid at "
- "offset 0x%x, is 0x%x, s/b 0x%x\n",
- save_len - len, val, le32_to_cpu(*image));
- ret = -EIO;
- errcnt++;
- if (errcnt >= 20)
- break;
- }
- }
-
- if (!errcnt)
- IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv,
- "ucode image in INSTRUCTION memory is good\n");
-
- return ret;
-}
-
-/**
- * iwl_verify_ucode - determine which instruction image is in SRAM,
- * and verify its contents
- */
-int iwl_verify_ucode(struct iwl_priv *priv)
-{
- __le32 *image;
- u32 len;
- int ret;
-
- /* Try bootstrap */
- image = (__le32 *)priv->ucode_boot.v_addr;
- len = priv->ucode_boot.len;
- ret = iwlcore_verify_inst_sparse(priv, image, len);
- if (!ret) {
- IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "Bootstrap uCode is good in inst SRAM\n");
- return 0;
- }
-
- /* Try initialize */
- image = (__le32 *)priv->ucode_init.v_addr;
- len = priv->ucode_init.len;
- ret = iwlcore_verify_inst_sparse(priv, image, len);
- if (!ret) {
- IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "Initialize uCode is good in inst SRAM\n");
- return 0;
- }
-
- /* Try runtime/protocol */
- image = (__le32 *)priv->ucode_code.v_addr;
- len = priv->ucode_code.len;
- ret = iwlcore_verify_inst_sparse(priv, image, len);
- if (!ret) {
- IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "Runtime uCode is good in inst SRAM\n");
- return 0;
- }
-
- IWL_ERR(priv, "NO VALID UCODE IMAGE IN INSTRUCTION SRAM!!\n");
-
- /* Since nothing seems to match, show first several data entries in
- * instruction SRAM, so maybe visual inspection will give a clue.
- * Selection of bootstrap image (vs. other images) is arbitrary. */
- image = (__le32 *)priv->ucode_boot.v_addr;
- len = priv->ucode_boot.len;
- ret = iwl_verify_inst_full(priv, image, len);
-
- return ret;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(iwl_verify_ucode);
-
-
void iwl_rf_kill_ct_config(struct iwl_priv *priv)
{
struct iwl_ct_kill_config cmd;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h
index 63229dc..d3b61dc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h
@@ -689,7 +689,6 @@ extern void iwl_rf_kill_ct_config(struct iwl_priv *priv);
extern void iwl_send_bt_config(struct iwl_priv *priv);
extern int iwl_send_statistics_request(struct iwl_priv *priv,
u8 flags, bool clear);
-extern int iwl_verify_ucode(struct iwl_priv *priv);
extern int iwl_send_lq_cmd(struct iwl_priv *priv,
struct iwl_link_quality_cmd *lq, u8 flags, bool init);
void iwl_apm_stop(struct iwl_priv *priv);
--
1.6.3.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-13 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-13 21:49 [PATCH 00/17] iwlwifi updates for 2.6.35 Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 01/17] iwlwifi: introduce iwl_sta_id_or_broadcast Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 02/17] iwlwifi: move _agn statistics related structure Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 03/17] iwlwifi: separate statistics flag function for agn & 3945 Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 04/17] iwlwifi: don't crash on firmware file missing info Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 05/17] iwl3945: remove sequence number assignment Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 06/17] iwlwifi: move iwl_free_tfds_in_queue to iwlagn Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 07/17] iwlwifi: improve station debugfs Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 08/17] iwlwifi: remove IWL_MULTICAST_ID Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 09/17] iwlwifi: fix and add missing sta_lock usage Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 10/17] iwlagn: use firmware event/error log information Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 11/17] iwlwifi: enable remaining 6000 Gen2 devices Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 12/17] iwlwifi: code cleanup for _agn devices Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 13/17] iwlwifi: modify out-dated comments Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 14/17] iwlwifi: split debug and debugfs options Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 15/17] iwlwifi: use proper short slot/preamble settings Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 17/17] iwlwifi: add new PCI IDs for 6000g2 devices Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1273787399-9280-17-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox