Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: linville@tuxdriver.com
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 16/17] iwlwifi: move ucode related function to iwl-agn-ucode.c
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 14:49:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273787399-9280-17-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273787399-9280-1-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com>

From: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Cleanup the code and move all the uCode related functions specific to _agn
devices to iwl-agn-ucode.c

Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-ucode.c |  123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.h       |    1 +
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c      |  124 --------------------------
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h      |    1 -
 4 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-ucode.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-ucode.c
index 637286c..6f77441 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-ucode.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-ucode.c
@@ -423,3 +423,126 @@ int iwlagn_alive_notify(struct iwl_priv *priv)
 
 	return 0;
 }
+
+
+/**
+ * iwl_verify_inst_sparse - verify runtime uCode image in card vs. host,
+ *   using sample data 100 bytes apart.  If these sample points are good,
+ *   it's a pretty good bet that everything between them is good, too.
+ */
+static int iwlcore_verify_inst_sparse(struct iwl_priv *priv, __le32 *image, u32 len)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	int ret = 0;
+	u32 errcnt = 0;
+	u32 i;
+
+	IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "ucode inst image size is %u\n", len);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < len; i += 100, image += 100/sizeof(u32)) {
+		/* read data comes through single port, auto-incr addr */
+		/* NOTE: Use the debugless read so we don't flood kernel log
+		 * if IWL_DL_IO is set */
+		iwl_write_direct32(priv, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RADDR,
+			i + IWLAGN_RTC_INST_LOWER_BOUND);
+		val = _iwl_read_direct32(priv, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RDAT);
+		if (val != le32_to_cpu(*image)) {
+			ret = -EIO;
+			errcnt++;
+			if (errcnt >= 3)
+				break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * iwlcore_verify_inst_full - verify runtime uCode image in card vs. host,
+ *     looking at all data.
+ */
+static int iwl_verify_inst_full(struct iwl_priv *priv, __le32 *image,
+				 u32 len)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	u32 save_len = len;
+	int ret = 0;
+	u32 errcnt;
+
+	IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "ucode inst image size is %u\n", len);
+
+	iwl_write_direct32(priv, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RADDR,
+			   IWLAGN_RTC_INST_LOWER_BOUND);
+
+	errcnt = 0;
+	for (; len > 0; len -= sizeof(u32), image++) {
+		/* read data comes through single port, auto-incr addr */
+		/* NOTE: Use the debugless read so we don't flood kernel log
+		 * if IWL_DL_IO is set */
+		val = _iwl_read_direct32(priv, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RDAT);
+		if (val != le32_to_cpu(*image)) {
+			IWL_ERR(priv, "uCode INST section is invalid at "
+				  "offset 0x%x, is 0x%x, s/b 0x%x\n",
+				  save_len - len, val, le32_to_cpu(*image));
+			ret = -EIO;
+			errcnt++;
+			if (errcnt >= 20)
+				break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (!errcnt)
+		IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv,
+		    "ucode image in INSTRUCTION memory is good\n");
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * iwl_verify_ucode - determine which instruction image is in SRAM,
+ *    and verify its contents
+ */
+int iwl_verify_ucode(struct iwl_priv *priv)
+{
+	__le32 *image;
+	u32 len;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Try bootstrap */
+	image = (__le32 *)priv->ucode_boot.v_addr;
+	len = priv->ucode_boot.len;
+	ret = iwlcore_verify_inst_sparse(priv, image, len);
+	if (!ret) {
+		IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "Bootstrap uCode is good in inst SRAM\n");
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	/* Try initialize */
+	image = (__le32 *)priv->ucode_init.v_addr;
+	len = priv->ucode_init.len;
+	ret = iwlcore_verify_inst_sparse(priv, image, len);
+	if (!ret) {
+		IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "Initialize uCode is good in inst SRAM\n");
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	/* Try runtime/protocol */
+	image = (__le32 *)priv->ucode_code.v_addr;
+	len = priv->ucode_code.len;
+	ret = iwlcore_verify_inst_sparse(priv, image, len);
+	if (!ret) {
+		IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "Runtime uCode is good in inst SRAM\n");
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	IWL_ERR(priv, "NO VALID UCODE IMAGE IN INSTRUCTION SRAM!!\n");
+
+	/* Since nothing seems to match, show first several data entries in
+	 * instruction SRAM, so maybe visual inspection will give a clue.
+	 * Selection of bootstrap image (vs. other images) is arbitrary. */
+	image = (__le32 *)priv->ucode_boot.v_addr;
+	len = priv->ucode_boot.len;
+	ret = iwl_verify_inst_full(priv, image, len);
+
+	return ret;
+}
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.h b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.h
index 2ebbe81..f7ef893 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.h
@@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ void iwlagn_rx_calib_complete(struct iwl_priv *priv,
 			   struct iwl_rx_mem_buffer *rxb);
 void iwlagn_init_alive_start(struct iwl_priv *priv);
 int iwlagn_alive_notify(struct iwl_priv *priv);
+int iwl_verify_ucode(struct iwl_priv *priv);
 
 /* lib */
 void iwl_check_abort_status(struct iwl_priv *priv,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c
index 10ce008..4a50c04 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c
@@ -1460,130 +1460,6 @@ int iwl_send_statistics_request(struct iwl_priv *priv, u8 flags, bool clear)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(iwl_send_statistics_request);
 
-/**
- * iwl_verify_inst_sparse - verify runtime uCode image in card vs. host,
- *   using sample data 100 bytes apart.  If these sample points are good,
- *   it's a pretty good bet that everything between them is good, too.
- */
-static int iwlcore_verify_inst_sparse(struct iwl_priv *priv, __le32 *image, u32 len)
-{
-	u32 val;
-	int ret = 0;
-	u32 errcnt = 0;
-	u32 i;
-
-	IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "ucode inst image size is %u\n", len);
-
-	for (i = 0; i < len; i += 100, image += 100/sizeof(u32)) {
-		/* read data comes through single port, auto-incr addr */
-		/* NOTE: Use the debugless read so we don't flood kernel log
-		 * if IWL_DL_IO is set */
-		iwl_write_direct32(priv, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RADDR,
-			i + IWL49_RTC_INST_LOWER_BOUND);
-		val = _iwl_read_direct32(priv, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RDAT);
-		if (val != le32_to_cpu(*image)) {
-			ret = -EIO;
-			errcnt++;
-			if (errcnt >= 3)
-				break;
-		}
-	}
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
-/**
- * iwlcore_verify_inst_full - verify runtime uCode image in card vs. host,
- *     looking at all data.
- */
-static int iwl_verify_inst_full(struct iwl_priv *priv, __le32 *image,
-				 u32 len)
-{
-	u32 val;
-	u32 save_len = len;
-	int ret = 0;
-	u32 errcnt;
-
-	IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "ucode inst image size is %u\n", len);
-
-	iwl_write_direct32(priv, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RADDR,
-			   IWL49_RTC_INST_LOWER_BOUND);
-
-	errcnt = 0;
-	for (; len > 0; len -= sizeof(u32), image++) {
-		/* read data comes through single port, auto-incr addr */
-		/* NOTE: Use the debugless read so we don't flood kernel log
-		 * if IWL_DL_IO is set */
-		val = _iwl_read_direct32(priv, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RDAT);
-		if (val != le32_to_cpu(*image)) {
-			IWL_ERR(priv, "uCode INST section is invalid at "
-				  "offset 0x%x, is 0x%x, s/b 0x%x\n",
-				  save_len - len, val, le32_to_cpu(*image));
-			ret = -EIO;
-			errcnt++;
-			if (errcnt >= 20)
-				break;
-		}
-	}
-
-	if (!errcnt)
-		IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv,
-		    "ucode image in INSTRUCTION memory is good\n");
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
-/**
- * iwl_verify_ucode - determine which instruction image is in SRAM,
- *    and verify its contents
- */
-int iwl_verify_ucode(struct iwl_priv *priv)
-{
-	__le32 *image;
-	u32 len;
-	int ret;
-
-	/* Try bootstrap */
-	image = (__le32 *)priv->ucode_boot.v_addr;
-	len = priv->ucode_boot.len;
-	ret = iwlcore_verify_inst_sparse(priv, image, len);
-	if (!ret) {
-		IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "Bootstrap uCode is good in inst SRAM\n");
-		return 0;
-	}
-
-	/* Try initialize */
-	image = (__le32 *)priv->ucode_init.v_addr;
-	len = priv->ucode_init.len;
-	ret = iwlcore_verify_inst_sparse(priv, image, len);
-	if (!ret) {
-		IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "Initialize uCode is good in inst SRAM\n");
-		return 0;
-	}
-
-	/* Try runtime/protocol */
-	image = (__le32 *)priv->ucode_code.v_addr;
-	len = priv->ucode_code.len;
-	ret = iwlcore_verify_inst_sparse(priv, image, len);
-	if (!ret) {
-		IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "Runtime uCode is good in inst SRAM\n");
-		return 0;
-	}
-
-	IWL_ERR(priv, "NO VALID UCODE IMAGE IN INSTRUCTION SRAM!!\n");
-
-	/* Since nothing seems to match, show first several data entries in
-	 * instruction SRAM, so maybe visual inspection will give a clue.
-	 * Selection of bootstrap image (vs. other images) is arbitrary. */
-	image = (__le32 *)priv->ucode_boot.v_addr;
-	len = priv->ucode_boot.len;
-	ret = iwl_verify_inst_full(priv, image, len);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(iwl_verify_ucode);
-
-
 void iwl_rf_kill_ct_config(struct iwl_priv *priv)
 {
 	struct iwl_ct_kill_config cmd;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h
index 63229dc..d3b61dc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h
@@ -689,7 +689,6 @@ extern void iwl_rf_kill_ct_config(struct iwl_priv *priv);
 extern void iwl_send_bt_config(struct iwl_priv *priv);
 extern int iwl_send_statistics_request(struct iwl_priv *priv,
 				       u8 flags, bool clear);
-extern int iwl_verify_ucode(struct iwl_priv *priv);
 extern int iwl_send_lq_cmd(struct iwl_priv *priv,
 		struct iwl_link_quality_cmd *lq, u8 flags, bool init);
 void iwl_apm_stop(struct iwl_priv *priv);
-- 
1.6.3.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-13 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-13 21:49 [PATCH 00/17] iwlwifi updates for 2.6.35 Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 01/17] iwlwifi: introduce iwl_sta_id_or_broadcast Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 02/17] iwlwifi: move _agn statistics related structure Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 03/17] iwlwifi: separate statistics flag function for agn & 3945 Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 04/17] iwlwifi: don't crash on firmware file missing info Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 05/17] iwl3945: remove sequence number assignment Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 06/17] iwlwifi: move iwl_free_tfds_in_queue to iwlagn Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 07/17] iwlwifi: improve station debugfs Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 08/17] iwlwifi: remove IWL_MULTICAST_ID Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 09/17] iwlwifi: fix and add missing sta_lock usage Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 10/17] iwlagn: use firmware event/error log information Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 11/17] iwlwifi: enable remaining 6000 Gen2 devices Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 12/17] iwlwifi: code cleanup for _agn devices Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 13/17] iwlwifi: modify out-dated comments Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 14/17] iwlwifi: split debug and debugfs options Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 15/17] iwlwifi: use proper short slot/preamble settings Reinette Chatre
2010-05-13 21:49 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2010-05-13 21:49 ` [PATCH 17/17] iwlwifi: add new PCI IDs for 6000g2 devices Reinette Chatre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1273787399-9280-17-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox