From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, lrodriguez@atheros.com
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] ath9k: fix false positives in the baseband hang check
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:09:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1278022192-83277-6-git-send-email-nbd@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1278022192-83277-5-git-send-email-nbd@openwrt.org>
ath9k_hw_check_alive() occasionally returns false, as the hardware
is still processing data in a specific state. Fix this issue by
repeating the test a few times with longer delay inbetween attempts.
This gets rid of excessive hardware resets that appear frequently on
some AR9132 based devices, but could also happen on AR9280.
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Reported-by: Björn Smedman <bjorn.smedman@venatech.se>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h | 2 ++
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h
index 72d5e52..6e486a5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h
@@ -428,6 +428,7 @@ int ath_beaconq_config(struct ath_softc *sc);
#define ATH_PAPRD_TIMEOUT 100 /* msecs */
+void ath_hw_check(struct work_struct *work);
void ath_paprd_calibrate(struct work_struct *work);
void ath_ani_calibrate(unsigned long data);
@@ -562,6 +563,7 @@ struct ath_softc {
spinlock_t sc_pm_lock;
struct mutex mutex;
struct work_struct paprd_work;
+ struct work_struct hw_check_work;
struct completion paprd_complete;
u32 intrstatus;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c
index 8700e3d..fe730cb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c
@@ -718,6 +718,7 @@ int ath9k_init_device(u16 devid, struct ath_softc *sc, u16 subsysid,
goto error_world;
}
+ INIT_WORK(&sc->hw_check_work, ath_hw_check);
INIT_WORK(&sc->paprd_work, ath_paprd_calibrate);
INIT_WORK(&sc->chan_work, ath9k_wiphy_chan_work);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&sc->wiphy_work, ath9k_wiphy_work);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
index efbf535..4c0831f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
@@ -515,6 +515,25 @@ static void ath_node_detach(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ieee80211_sta *sta)
ath_tx_node_cleanup(sc, an);
}
+void ath_hw_check(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct ath_softc *sc = container_of(work, struct ath_softc, hw_check_work);
+ int i;
+
+ ath9k_ps_wakeup(sc);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+ if (ath9k_hw_check_alive(sc->sc_ah))
+ goto out;
+
+ msleep(1);
+ }
+ ath_reset(sc, false);
+
+out:
+ ath9k_ps_restore(sc);
+}
+
void ath9k_tasklet(unsigned long data)
{
struct ath_softc *sc = (struct ath_softc *)data;
@@ -526,13 +545,15 @@ void ath9k_tasklet(unsigned long data)
ath9k_ps_wakeup(sc);
- if ((status & ATH9K_INT_FATAL) ||
- !ath9k_hw_check_alive(ah)) {
+ if (status & ATH9K_INT_FATAL) {
ath_reset(sc, false);
ath9k_ps_restore(sc);
return;
}
+ if (!ath9k_hw_check_alive(ah))
+ ieee80211_queue_work(sc->hw, &sc->hw_check_work);
+
if (ah->caps.hw_caps & ATH9K_HW_CAP_EDMA)
rxmask = (ATH9K_INT_RXHP | ATH9K_INT_RXLP | ATH9K_INT_RXEOL |
ATH9K_INT_RXORN);
@@ -1253,6 +1274,7 @@ static void ath9k_stop(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&sc->tx_complete_work);
cancel_work_sync(&sc->paprd_work);
+ cancel_work_sync(&sc->hw_check_work);
if (!sc->num_sec_wiphy) {
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&sc->wiphy_work);
@@ -1976,6 +1998,7 @@ static void ath9k_sw_scan_start(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
sc->sc_flags |= SC_OP_SCANNING;
del_timer_sync(&common->ani.timer);
cancel_work_sync(&sc->paprd_work);
+ cancel_work_sync(&sc->hw_check_work);
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&sc->tx_complete_work);
mutex_unlock(&sc->mutex);
}
--
1.6.4.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-01 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-01 22:09 [PATCH 1/6] ath9k_hw: fix a few inconsistencies in initval array names Felix Fietkau
2010-07-01 22:09 ` [PATCH 2/6] ath9k_hw: reformat the ar5008, ar9001 and ar9002 initvals to match ar9003 Felix Fietkau
2010-07-01 22:09 ` [PATCH 3/6] ath9k_hw: sync initvals for ar9001 and ar9002 with Atheros Felix Fietkau
2010-07-01 22:09 ` [PATCH 4/6] ath9k_hw: sanitize noise floor values properly on all chips Felix Fietkau
2010-07-01 22:09 ` [PATCH 5/6] ath9k_hw: clean up the noise floor calibration code to reduce code duplication Felix Fietkau
2010-07-01 22:09 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2010-07-03 0:53 ` [PATCH 6/6] ath9k: fix false positives in the baseband hang check Björn Smedman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1278022192-83277-6-git-send-email-nbd@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox