Re: iwlagn 3.0.9 aggreggation messages

[wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>]

On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 15:16 -0800, Lars Schotte wrote:
> i looked over some changelogs .. from the linux kernel 3.1 branch.
> 
> i saw that you ve introduced some patches to this, or you at least
> signed them off.
> 
> the changelog also says that you've changed the logging level for that
> aggregation problem, so even if it would be there, it doesnt pop up on
> kernel 3.1's.
> 
> i also did read there that there was like waiting for a real reason to
> move to aggregation. so it was there the whole time, only it did not
> write itself out on the log.
> 
> so i am not sure if we were not just hunting ghosts here.
> 
you are correct, I do have patch to modify the log level and make sur
ewe are not generate the un-necessary messages in the log and cause
confusion. But I don't think it is related to what the behavior you are
seeing (at least I hope not); but I will double check. 

Thanks
Wey

> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:59:33 -0800
> wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > ok, thanks
> > 
> > please do let us know if it appear on 3.1.1
> > 
> > at the meantime, we will look into how to backport to 3.0.x
> > 
> > Regards
> > Wey
> > 
> > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 14:56 -0800, Lars Schotte wrote:
> > > i definitely see it in 3.0.8 and 3.0.9.
> > > 
> > > on the fedora fc16 linux kernel 3.1.1 it did not yet appear, but
> > > that may change.
> > > 
> > > so maybe it would be worth a look if it is not fixed by 3.1.1, or if
> > > something changed. however ... if it is a FIX, it should definitely
> > > be fixed also in 3.0.X branch.
> > > 
> > > so that message still is there on 3.0.9 and 3.0.8, we will see about
> > > the more current ones.
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:41:42 -0800
> > > wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > so youno longer seeing the issue?
> > > > 
> > > > Wey
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
>