From: Lars Schotte <gusto@guttok.net>
To: wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iwlagn 3.0.9 aggreggation messages
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:16:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111115001621.0f89db2f@hana.gusto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1321311573.1796.35.camel@wwguy-ubuntu>
i looked over some changelogs .. from the linux kernel 3.1 branch.
i saw that you ve introduced some patches to this, or you at least
signed them off.
the changelog also says that you've changed the logging level for that
aggregation problem, so even if it would be there, it doesnt pop up on
kernel 3.1's.
i also did read there that there was like waiting for a real reason to
move to aggregation. so it was there the whole time, only it did not
write itself out on the log.
so i am not sure if we were not just hunting ghosts here.
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:59:33 -0800
wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> wrote:
> ok, thanks
>
> please do let us know if it appear on 3.1.1
>
> at the meantime, we will look into how to backport to 3.0.x
>
> Regards
> Wey
>
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 14:56 -0800, Lars Schotte wrote:
> > i definitely see it in 3.0.8 and 3.0.9.
> >
> > on the fedora fc16 linux kernel 3.1.1 it did not yet appear, but
> > that may change.
> >
> > so maybe it would be worth a look if it is not fixed by 3.1.1, or if
> > something changed. however ... if it is a FIX, it should definitely
> > be fixed also in 3.0.X branch.
> >
> > so that message still is there on 3.0.9 and 3.0.8, we will see about
> > the more current ones.
> >
> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:41:42 -0800
> > wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > so youno longer seeing the issue?
> > >
> > > Wey
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
Lars Schotte
@ Hana (F16)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-14 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-14 12:16 iwlagn 3.0.9 aggreggation messages Lars Schotte
2011-11-14 15:10 ` wwguy
2011-11-14 19:19 ` Lars Schotte
2011-11-14 20:38 ` wwguy
2011-11-14 21:13 ` Lars Schotte
2011-11-14 21:18 ` Lars Schotte
2011-11-14 21:22 ` wwguy
2011-11-14 21:47 ` Lars Schotte
2011-11-14 21:44 ` wwguy
2011-11-14 22:05 ` Lars Schotte
2011-11-14 22:28 ` Lars Schotte
2011-11-14 22:41 ` wwguy
2011-11-14 22:56 ` Lars Schotte
2011-11-14 22:59 ` wwguy
2011-11-14 23:16 ` Lars Schotte [this message]
2011-11-14 23:17 ` wwguy
2011-11-14 23:30 ` Lars Schotte
2011-11-14 23:31 ` wwguy
2011-11-14 23:58 ` Lars Schotte
2011-11-14 22:29 ` Lars Schotte
2011-11-14 21:27 ` wwguy
2011-11-14 21:50 ` Lars Schotte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111115001621.0f89db2f@hana.gusto \
--to=gusto@guttok.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox