From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: arik@wizery.com, coelho@ti.com
Subject: [PATCH 01/24] wlcore/wl12xx: set the number of Tx descriptors per chip family
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:53:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334174020-18957-2-git-send-email-coelho@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334174020-18957-1-git-send-email-coelho@ti.com>
From: Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>
Each chip family can have a different amount of Tx descriptors. These
are set on init.
Signed-off-by: Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl12xx/main.c | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/acx.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c | 4 +++-
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c | 10 +++++-----
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wl12xx.h | 2 --
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h | 10 ++++++++--
6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl12xx/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl12xx/main.c
index e05a1cf..57c70a4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl12xx/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl12xx/main.c
@@ -674,6 +674,7 @@ static int __devinit wl12xx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
wl->ops = &wl12xx_ops;
wl->ptable = wl12xx_ptable;
wl->rtable = wl12xx_rtable;
+ wl->num_tx_desc = 16;
return wlcore_probe(wl, pdev);
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/acx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/acx.c
index cba8af2..c811f75 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/acx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/acx.c
@@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ int wl12xx_acx_mem_cfg(struct wl1271 *wl)
mem_conf->rx_mem_block_num = mem->rx_block_num;
mem_conf->tx_min_mem_block_num = mem->tx_min_block_num;
mem_conf->num_ssid_profiles = mem->ssid_profiles;
- mem_conf->total_tx_descriptors = cpu_to_le32(ACX_TX_DESCRIPTORS);
+ mem_conf->total_tx_descriptors = cpu_to_le32(wl->num_tx_desc);
mem_conf->dyn_mem_enable = mem->dynamic_memory;
mem_conf->tx_free_req = mem->min_req_tx_blocks;
mem_conf->rx_free_req = mem->min_req_rx_blocks;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c
index 2e29baf..7b39a86 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c
@@ -5269,7 +5269,7 @@ struct ieee80211_hw *wlcore_alloc_hw(size_t priv_size)
__set_bit(WL12XX_SYSTEM_HLID, wl->links_map);
memset(wl->tx_frames_map, 0, sizeof(wl->tx_frames_map));
- for (i = 0; i < ACX_TX_DESCRIPTORS; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < wl->num_tx_desc; i++)
wl->tx_frames[i] = NULL;
spin_lock_init(&wl->wl_lock);
@@ -5411,6 +5411,8 @@ int __devinit wlcore_probe(struct wl1271 *wl, struct platform_device *pdev)
goto out_free_hw;
}
+ BUG_ON(wl->num_tx_desc > WLCORE_MAX_TX_DESCRIPTORS);
+
wl->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
wl->ref_clock = pdata->board_ref_clock;
wl->tcxo_clock = pdata->board_tcxo_clock;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c
index 176b950..815d0ac 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ static int wl1271_alloc_tx_id(struct wl1271 *wl, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
int id;
- id = find_first_zero_bit(wl->tx_frames_map, ACX_TX_DESCRIPTORS);
- if (id >= ACX_TX_DESCRIPTORS)
+ id = find_first_zero_bit(wl->tx_frames_map, wl->num_tx_desc);
+ if (id >= wl->num_tx_desc)
return -EBUSY;
__set_bit(id, wl->tx_frames_map);
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static int wl1271_alloc_tx_id(struct wl1271 *wl, struct sk_buff *skb)
static void wl1271_free_tx_id(struct wl1271 *wl, int id)
{
if (__test_and_clear_bit(id, wl->tx_frames_map)) {
- if (unlikely(wl->tx_frames_cnt == ACX_TX_DESCRIPTORS))
+ if (unlikely(wl->tx_frames_cnt == wl->num_tx_desc))
clear_bit(WL1271_FLAG_FW_TX_BUSY, &wl->flags);
wl->tx_frames[id] = NULL;
@@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ static void wl1271_tx_complete_packet(struct wl1271 *wl,
u8 retries = 0;
/* check for id legality */
- if (unlikely(id >= ACX_TX_DESCRIPTORS || wl->tx_frames[id] == NULL)) {
+ if (unlikely(id >= wl->num_tx_desc || wl->tx_frames[id] == NULL)) {
wl1271_warning("TX result illegal id: %d", id);
return;
}
@@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ void wl12xx_tx_reset(struct wl1271 *wl, bool reset_tx_queues)
if (reset_tx_queues)
wl1271_handle_tx_low_watermark(wl);
- for (i = 0; i < ACX_TX_DESCRIPTORS; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < wl->num_tx_desc; i++) {
if (wl->tx_frames[i] == NULL)
continue;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wl12xx.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wl12xx.h
index b4db4cc..1516622 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wl12xx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wl12xx.h
@@ -89,8 +89,6 @@
#define WL1271_AP_BSS_INDEX 0
#define WL1271_AP_DEF_BEACON_EXP 20
-#define ACX_TX_DESCRIPTORS 16
-
#define WL1271_AGGR_BUFFER_SIZE (4 * PAGE_SIZE)
enum wl1271_state {
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h
index 01ac091..a4f576d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
#include "wl12xx.h"
#include "event.h"
+/* The maximum number of Tx descriptors in all chip families */
+#define WLCORE_MAX_TX_DESCRIPTORS 32
+
struct wlcore_ops {
int (*identify_chip)(struct wl1271 *wl);
int (*boot)(struct wl1271 *wl);
@@ -174,8 +177,8 @@ struct wl1271 {
struct workqueue_struct *freezable_wq;
/* Pending TX frames */
- unsigned long tx_frames_map[BITS_TO_LONGS(ACX_TX_DESCRIPTORS)];
- struct sk_buff *tx_frames[ACX_TX_DESCRIPTORS];
+ unsigned long tx_frames_map[BITS_TO_LONGS(WLCORE_MAX_TX_DESCRIPTORS)];
+ struct sk_buff *tx_frames[WLCORE_MAX_TX_DESCRIPTORS];
int tx_frames_cnt;
/* FW Rx counter */
@@ -303,6 +306,9 @@ struct wl1271 {
/* per-chip-family private structure */
void *priv;
+
+ /* number of TX descriptors the HW supports. */
+ u32 num_tx_desc;
};
int __devinit wlcore_probe(struct wl1271 *wl, struct platform_device *pdev);
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-11 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-11 19:53 [PATCH 00/24] wl12xx/wl1251/wlcore: reorganize drivers part 2 Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` Luciano Coelho [this message]
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 02/24] wlcore/wl12xx: change GEM Tx-spare blocks per-vif Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 03/24] wlcore/wl12xx: add hw op for calculating hw block count per packet Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 04/24] wlcore/wl12xx: add hw op for setting blocks in hw_tx_desc Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 05/24] wlcore/wl12xx: add hw op for setting frame length in tx_hw_desc Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 06/24] wlcore/wl12xx: add global elements to convert hw-rates to standard rates Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 07/24] wlcore: introduce Rx block-size alignment HW quirk Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 08/24] wlcore/wl12xx: add hw op for getting rx buffer data alignment Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 09/24] wlcore/wl12xx: add prepare_read hw op for Rx data Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 10/24] wlcore/wl12xx: add hw op for getting rx packet data length Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 11/24] wlcore/wl12xx: split Tx completion to immediate/delayed Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 12/24] wlcore/wl12xx: turn no-Tx-align quirk into Tx-align Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 13/24] wlcore/wl12xx: add hw_init operation Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 14/24] wlcore/wl12xx: add hw op for vif init Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 15/24] wlcore/wl12xx: expand functionality of cmd_trigger HW op Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 16/24] wlcore/wl12xx: move runtime configuration struct to the lower driver Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 17/24] wlcore/wl12xx: move extended radio configuration parameters to wl12xx Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 18/24] wlcore/wl12xx: use a single memory config and reset if using wl127x Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 19/24] wlcore/wl12xx: add hw op to get rate-mask for AP-link in STA mode Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 20/24] wlcore/wl12xx: set HT capabilities per chip-family Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 21/24] wlcore: set max_rx_agg_subframes in mac80211 according to HT conf Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 22/24] wlcore/wl12xx: move identify firmware function to a lower driver op Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 23/24] wlcore: add module param to prevent HW recovery Luciano Coelho
2012-04-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 24/24] wlcore/wl12xx: adapt FW status for multiple families Luciano Coelho
2012-04-12 12:43 ` [PATCH 00/24] wl12xx/wl1251/wlcore: reorganize drivers part 2 Luciano Coelho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1334174020-18957-2-git-send-email-coelho@ti.com \
--to=coelho@ti.com \
--cc=arik@wizery.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox