From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Simon Wunderlich <simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Mathias Kretschmer <mathias.kretschmer@fokus.fraunhofer.de>,
Simon Wunderlich <siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] add master channel switch announcement support
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 12:09:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1368439778.8300.20.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367867635-3459-1-git-send-email-siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 21:13 +0200, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> This is an early RFC of a possible channel switch announcement infrastructure.
> It adds CSA/ECSA handling support for AP. This is required for DFS operation
> (e.g. Wi-Fi Alliance requires this for 802.11h certification). This will also
> be required for IBSS-DFS later.
>
> I'd like to discuss if this design approach is going in the right direction.
> What is currently working:
>
> * channels are announced by adding IEs (CSA and Extended CSA) in beacons
> * after some (configurable) time, the channel is switched
> * with the channel switch, CSA/ECSA IEs are removed and channel information
> is updated.
> * Userspace calls a new command NL80211_CMD_CHANNEL_SWITCH along with channel info
> (freq + width), whether traffic should be blocked and timing information
> * it currently works for me [TM] on my ath9k based machine
I don't really like your approach of building all the IEs in the kernel.
There are some things, like the country-after-switch in the CSA wrapper
(introduced in 11ac), that would be really awkward this way.
> * We already have NL80211_CMD_CH_SWITCH_NOTIFY which is only used for notification.
> Maybe we can rename that and re-use it instead of adding a new command
> NL80211_CMD_CHANNEL_SWITCH?
Sure, I don't really care though.
> * Changes from HT20/NOHT to HT20/NOHT are handled with normal Channel Switch
> Announcements, everything else (for 40 MHz) is done with Extended Channel Switch
> Announcements. As far as I read the spec, we can't use the secondary channel
> offset IE in beacons, but maybe I'm wrong here?
No, you're right and I was wrong :-)
> * could other drivers (next to ath9k) work with this API?
Probably not easily. Any TI folks reading this?
Anyway I think it'd be better to try to provide
(a) the "during-switch IEs", maybe with an offset to the counter so
mac80211,
driver or the device itself can count down
(b) the "after-switch beacon" IEs (and maybe probe response for
offload)
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-13 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-06 19:13 [RFC 0/4] add master channel switch announcement support Simon Wunderlich
2013-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC 1/4] cfg80211: add chandef to operating class conversion Simon Wunderlich
2013-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC 2/4] nl80211/cfg80211: add channel switch command Simon Wunderlich
2013-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC 3/4] mac80211: add channel switch command and beacon callbacks Simon Wunderlich
2013-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC 4/4] ath9k: enable CSA functionality in ath9k Simon Wunderlich
2013-05-13 10:09 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2013-05-14 9:27 ` [RFC 0/4] add master channel switch announcement support Simon Wunderlich
2013-05-28 10:43 ` Simon Wunderlich
2013-06-11 12:31 ` Johannes Berg
2013-06-11 14:18 ` Simon Wunderlich
2013-06-18 14:01 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1368439778.8300.20.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.kretschmer@fokus.fraunhofer.de \
--cc=simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de \
--cc=siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox