Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Martin Blumenstingl" <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	"Felix Fietkau" <nbd@nbd.name>,
	"Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] cfg80211: support ieee80211-freq-limit DT property
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 08:06:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1483427177.15591.5.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACna6ryrYY5G=Fvmsrq_sD3iX5dWreyz7R8mGEd6ogUck=twnQ@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20170102_231255_379430_96267468)


> When driver uses custom regulatory it registers initial channels at
> init but it can also react to regdom changes using reg_notifier. Is
> that correct?

We can treat regulatory and OF data as entirely independent, I think.
At least that's my suggestion:

 * use OF data to populate the original channel list, saying which
   channels are valid (or not)
 * use regulatory later to further restrict settings of the channels

> So I'm looking at brcmf_cfg80211_reg_notifier which calls
> brcmf_setup_wiphybands which calls brcmf_construct_chaninfo.
> That last one reworks all channels on every call. It first marks all
> existing channels as DISABLED then queries firmware for the list of
> supported channels and updates wiphy channels one by one.
> So if I understand this correctly, every regdom change can result in
> rebuilding channels pretty much from the scratch. That's why I
> believed I need to call wiphy_freq_limits_apply on runtime, not just
> during the init.
> 
> Is there some flow in my understanding?

I think maybe there's a problem in my understanding :)

All the regulatory code usually takes into account channel->orig_flags. 
If this code also did, then we could have the original DISABLED flag
taken from OF still be valid here.

johannes

johannes

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-03  7:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-02 16:32 [PATCH V3 1/2] dt-bindings: document common IEEE 802.11 frequency limit property Rafał Miłecki
2017-01-02 16:32 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] cfg80211: support ieee80211-freq-limit DT property Rafał Miłecki
2017-01-02 17:52   ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-02 20:12     ` Arend van Spriel
2017-01-02 22:16       ` Rafał Miłecki
2017-01-03  7:00       ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-02 22:12     ` Rafał Miłecki
2017-01-03  7:06       ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2017-01-02 16:32 ` [PATCH V3 3/2] brcmfmac: use wiphy_read_of_freq_limits to get extra limits Rafał Miłecki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1483427177.15591.5.camel@sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=arend@broadcom.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox