From: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Ian Molton <ian@mnementh.co.uk>,
Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] brcmfmac: Remove repeated calls to brcmf_chip_get_core()
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:10:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1512735035-342-11-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512735035-342-1-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
From: Ian Molton <ian@mnementh.co.uk>
There is no need to repeatdly call brcmf_chip_get_core(), which
traverses a list of cores every time its called (including during
register access code!).
Call it once, and store a pointer to the core structure. The existing
code does nto keep track of users of the cores anyway, and even so, this
will allow for easier refcounting in future.
Signed-off-by: Ian Molton <ian@mnementh.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
---
.../wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 25 +++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
index 1e1e198..93a1a0c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
@@ -436,6 +436,7 @@ struct brcmf_sdio_count {
struct brcmf_sdio {
struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev; /* sdio device handler */
struct brcmf_chip *ci; /* Chip info struct */
+ struct brcmf_core *sdio_core; /* sdio core info struct */
u32 hostintmask; /* Copy of Host Interrupt Mask */
atomic_t intstatus; /* Intstatus bits (events) pending */
@@ -665,10 +666,9 @@ static bool data_ok(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
*/
static int r_sdreg32(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, u32 *regvar, u32 offset)
{
- struct brcmf_core *core;
+ struct brcmf_core *core = bus->sdio_core;
int ret;
- core = brcmf_chip_get_core(bus->ci, BCMA_CORE_SDIO_DEV);
*regvar = brcmf_sdiod_readl(bus->sdiodev, core->base + offset, &ret);
return ret;
@@ -676,10 +676,9 @@ static int r_sdreg32(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, u32 *regvar, u32 offset)
static int w_sdreg32(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, u32 regval, u32 reg_offset)
{
- struct brcmf_core *core;
+ struct brcmf_core *core = bus->sdio_core;
int ret;
- core = brcmf_chip_get_core(bus->ci, BCMA_CORE_SDIO_DEV);
brcmf_sdiod_writel(bus->sdiodev, core->base + reg_offset, regval, &ret);
return ret;
@@ -2495,12 +2494,11 @@ static inline void brcmf_sdio_clrintr(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
static int brcmf_sdio_intr_rstatus(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
{
- struct brcmf_core *buscore;
+ struct brcmf_core *buscore = bus->sdio_core;
u32 addr;
unsigned long val;
int ret;
- buscore = brcmf_chip_get_core(bus->ci, BCMA_CORE_SDIO_DEV);
addr = buscore->base + SD_REG(intstatus);
val = brcmf_sdiod_readl(bus->sdiodev, addr, &ret);
@@ -3377,13 +3375,14 @@ static void brcmf_sdio_sr_init(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
/* enable KSO bit */
static int brcmf_sdio_kso_init(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
{
+ struct brcmf_core *core = bus->sdio_core;
u8 val;
int err = 0;
brcmf_dbg(TRACE, "Enter\n");
/* KSO bit added in SDIO core rev 12 */
- if (brcmf_chip_get_core(bus->ci, BCMA_CORE_SDIO_DEV)->rev < 12)
+ if (core->rev < 12)
return 0;
val = brcmf_sdiod_readb(bus->sdiodev, SBSDIO_FUNC1_SLEEPCSR, &err);
@@ -3412,6 +3411,7 @@ static int brcmf_sdio_bus_preinit(struct device *dev)
struct brcmf_bus *bus_if = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev = bus_if->bus_priv.sdio;
struct brcmf_sdio *bus = sdiodev->bus;
+ struct brcmf_core *core = bus->sdio_core;
uint pad_size;
u32 value;
int err;
@@ -3420,7 +3420,7 @@ static int brcmf_sdio_bus_preinit(struct device *dev)
* a device perspective, ie. bus:txglom affects the
* bus transfers from device to host.
*/
- if (brcmf_chip_get_core(bus->ci, BCMA_CORE_SDIO_DEV)->rev < 12) {
+ if (core->rev < 12) {
/* for sdio core rev < 12, disable txgloming */
value = 0;
err = brcmf_iovar_data_set(dev, "bus:txglom", &value,
@@ -3758,11 +3758,10 @@ static void brcmf_sdio_buscore_activate(void *ctx, struct brcmf_chip *chip,
u32 rstvec)
{
struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev = ctx;
- struct brcmf_core *core;
+ struct brcmf_core *core = sdiodev->bus->sdio_core;
u32 reg_addr;
/* clear all interrupts */
- core = brcmf_chip_get_core(chip, BCMA_CORE_SDIO_DEV);
reg_addr = core->base + SD_REG(intstatus);
brcmf_sdiod_writel(sdiodev, reg_addr, 0xFFFFFFFF, NULL);
@@ -3843,6 +3842,12 @@ static void brcmf_sdio_buscore_write32(void *ctx, u32 addr, u32 val)
bus->ci = NULL;
goto fail;
}
+
+ /* Pick up the SDIO core info struct from chip.c */
+ bus->sdio_core = brcmf_chip_get_core(bus->ci, BCMA_CORE_SDIO_DEV);
+ if (!bus->sdio_core)
+ goto fail;
+
sdiodev->settings = brcmf_get_module_param(sdiodev->dev,
BRCMF_BUSTYPE_SDIO,
bus->ci->chip,
--
1.9.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-08 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-08 12:10 [PATCH 00/10] brcmfmac: restructuring sdio access functions - take 2 Arend van Spriel
2017-12-08 12:10 ` [PATCH 01/10] brcmfmac: Split brcmf_sdiod_buffrw function up Arend van Spriel
2017-12-14 12:41 ` [01/10] " Kalle Valo
2017-12-08 12:10 ` [PATCH 02/10] brcmfmac: whitespace fixes in brcmf_sdiod_send_buf() Arend van Spriel
2017-12-08 12:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] brcmfmac: Clarify if using braces Arend van Spriel
2017-12-08 12:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] brcmfmac: Rename / replace old IO functions with simpler ones Arend van Spriel
2017-12-08 12:10 ` [PATCH 05/10] brcmfmac: Tidy register definitions a little Arend van Spriel
2017-12-08 12:10 ` [PATCH 06/10] brcmfmac: Remove brcmf_sdiod_addrprep() Arend van Spriel
2017-12-08 12:10 ` [PATCH 07/10] brcmfmac: remove unnecessary call to brcmf_sdiod_set_backplane_window() Arend van Spriel
2017-12-08 12:10 ` [PATCH 08/10] brcmfmac: Cleanup offsetof() Arend van Spriel
2017-12-08 12:10 ` [PATCH 09/10] brcmfmac: Remove unused macro Arend van Spriel
2017-12-08 12:10 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1512735035-342-11-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--to=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=ian@mnementh.co.uk \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox